Golden Code Redmine

11/09/2024

05:57 PM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Committed on 9267a, rev. 15541.
Well, my 9267a only goes to revision 15527. Are we facing an... Radu Apetrii

11/06/2024

07:02 AM Database Feature #9057: enable intermixed access to default tenant (shared) data and tenant-specific data

Radu Apetrii wrote:
> Rev. 15533 seems to be with things from the trunk, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
Or not... Radu Apetrii

06:33 AM Database Feature #9057: enable intermixed access to default tenant (shared) data and tenant-specific data

I assume the revisions that need reviewing are 15526-15532 inclusively. Rev. 15533 seems to be with things from the t... Radu Apetrii

11/05/2024

03:04 PM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I committed on 9267a, rev. 15531.
Eduard, are you sure the branch was bound when you commit... Radu Apetrii

07:51 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> > * Radu: I'll look into #9267-36 and see what I can deduce.
>
> If you need more assistan... Radu Apetrii

07:48 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

First of all, don't ask me what I searched to get to this pdf. Secondly, it seems that we were right: persistent tabl... Radu Apetrii

06:48 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Radu Apetrii wrote:
>
> > I think we're going to need an example for each of these cases. ... Radu Apetrii

06:40 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > OK, an update to this: I believe the alphabetical order is for the "static" index definit... Radu Apetrii

06:32 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

I've also added Eric as a watcher to this discussion. I don't know why he wasn't here in the first place. Radu Apetrii

06:30 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Radu Apetrii wrote:
> Does this mean that the order in which we define the indexes is the tie-breaker here? If so, ... Radu Apetrii

11/04/2024

09:23 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There are documented rules for index selection here: [[p2j:Chapter_27_Sorting_Query_Resu... Radu Apetrii

06:41 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

OK, so, here's the testcase:
Table definition:
{{collapse... Radu Apetrii

02:58 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard: I got informed by a customer of a query that uses the wrong index now (with the 9267a changes), and was using... Radu Apetrii

11/01/2024

07:55 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

I finished testing another customer application. The result is positive, everything went fine. ✅ Radu Apetrii

10/30/2024

07:25 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I made some changes to reflect behaviour from #9267-20 in 9267a, rev. 15523. Please review.
... Radu Apetrii

10/29/2024

09:45 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

So, I've attached the @.df@ used. It's a basic @test@ persistent table with three indexes: one primary unique one (wh... Radu Apetrii

09:31 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

It seems that 9267a fixes my issue from #8357-140. Eduard, if you want, I can post here a small testcase with what I ... Radu Apetrii

10/25/2024

09:05 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.

If needed, there is also this wiki page "Index Selection":https://proj.goldencode.com/projects/p2j/wiki/Chapter_27_So... Radu Apetrii

10/15/2024

07:52 AM User Interface Bug #8239: SELECTION-LIST set SCREEN-VALUE regression from trunk rev. 14821

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Radu, what issue/task branch resolved this?
It was trunk revision 15114 that fixed the issue.
Radu Apetrii

10/14/2024

04:06 AM User Interface Bug #8239: SELECTION-LIST set SCREEN-VALUE regression from trunk rev. 14821

I re-checked this, and it was solved in the meantime. It can be closed. Radu Apetrii