Artur Școlnic's activity
From 06/27/2025 to 07/26/2025
07/26/2025
- 08:15 AM Database Bug #10337 (Review): Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- I overhauled the ReverseLookup and brought back the changes from 9802f, tested the code and it is as fast as 9802f, I...
07/25/2025
- 09:32 AM Database Bug #10337: Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- Reverted the changes from trunk rev 16051. I will create 10337b and use it to bring those back with a more robust mem...
07/24/2025
- 10:20 AM Database Bug #10337: Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- 10337a was merged to trunk as rev 16069.
- 10:11 AM Database Bug #10337: Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- Harness and webui navigation passed.
- 10:03 AM Database Bug #10337: Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- I changed it.
- 09:43 AM Database Bug #10337: Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- I extended the check to resolvable also, the code is in rev 16070.
- 09:15 AM Database Bug #10337 (Review): Possible memory leak with FastFindCache
- I committed the fix to 10337a/16069.
07/23/2025
- 07:52 AM Base Language Bug #10313 (Review): server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this pa...
- Committed the changes to 10313a/16066, please review.
- 07:48 AM Base Language Bug #10313: server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this path by def...
- It does :) I also found now that @Paths.get(name).isAbsolute()@ works, I am wrapping up the changes.
- 07:39 AM Base Language Bug #10313: server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this path by def...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Artur, please check in @initFileInfo@ that the given name is not an absolute name first.... - 07:31 AM Base Language Bug #10313 (WIP): server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this path ...
07/22/2025
- 08:06 AM Base Language Bug #10313 (Review): server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this pa...
- I think I found an easier way, the code is in 10313a/16065.
The test cases I am working with are:...
07/21/2025
- 07:14 AM Base Language Bug #10313 (WIP): server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this path ...
- As far as I can understand the current dir @.@ should be resolved to the @workingDir@ defined in the directory.xml. I...
- 05:29 AM Base Language Bug #10313: server-sidef file-system must 'mount' user's working dir and look in this path by def...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Artur, do you want to work on this?
Sure.
07/17/2025
- 02:17 AM Database Bug #9683: CompoundQuery is doing extra hydration attempts
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We need to finish the work in #6720.
Before finishing up #9683 or instead of #9683?
07/16/2025
- 10:50 AM Database Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- I am a little late to the party, but glancing over this task, I think Docker fits quite well for Stateless FWD Cluste...
- 10:14 AM Database Bug #9683 (Review): CompoundQuery is doing extra hydration attempts
- 06:48 AM Database Bug #9683: CompoundQuery is doing extra hydration attempts
- Rebased 9683a on trunk rev 16047. Addressed review points in rev 16053.
- 09:59 AM Base Language Bug #9060: Cache oftenly used values that are immutable
- Rebased 9060b on trunk rev 16051.
07/10/2025
- 09:24 AM Base Language Feature #10280: AppServer Response Caching
- *Overview*
In the FWD layer, we have full control over AppServer requests and responses. This presents a clear opp... - 09:19 AM Base Language Feature #10280 (New): AppServer Response Caching
07/03/2025
- 08:31 AM TRPL Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Octavian, just as a side note, Java 21 finally introduced virtual or 'green' threads, the advantages over physical th...
07/01/2025
- 06:27 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I used the temp table for simplicity, the behavior of the @find@ should be similar. I am just trying to understand wh...
- 04:08 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- ...
- 02:56 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I made the change, the code is in 10222a/16013.
06/30/2025
- 07:47 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I agree, in a hypothetical scenario where someone changes a record and immediately attempts to find it more than once...
- 07:42 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- So to be clear, in the same session, If a record is modified, but not yet committed, it should be cached and be found...
- 07:37 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I one session runs a FIND multiple times, then it won't benefit from the cache considering ... - 07:21 AM Database Support #10222 (Review): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if d...
- I added a new dmo state @COMMITED@, it indicates that a record contains committed data, dafault value is true. The fa...
- 04:31 AM Database Support #10222 (WIP): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disa...
- 04:03 AM Database Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- There are two changes we should consider implementing to prevent transaction isolation violations in Fast Find Cache:...
06/27/2025
- 09:23 AM Database Feature #4012: replacing TCP/IP (AF_INET) sockets with Unix Domain Sockets (AF_UNIX) as PostgreSQ...
- I did a small investigation into this issue, my main conclusions are:
1. Unix sockets cannot be used to communicat...
Also available in: Atom