Teodor Gorghe's activity
From 08/25/2025 to 09/23/2025
09/23/2025
- 09:47 AM Base Language Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Committed revision *16139* on task branch *10352a*:
- Changed @column.getXmlNodeName()@ with @column.getFieldName()@... - 09:12 AM Base Language Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Committed revision *16138* on task branch *10352a*:
- Skipping relation fields when the parser reaches it. The chang... - 07:55 AM Base Language Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Exactly.
What should I do for this issue? Create a new task/commit here? - 07:52 AM Base Language Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor, please explain more: usually @PARENT-ID-RELATION@ are hidden (thus computed aut... - 03:10 AM Base Language Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- There is a unit test from customer application, which fails because of a @RECID@ field.
Please see this test case, w... - 06:44 AM Database Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...
- On @XmlImport.resolveTableByXmlName@, I don't think is right to use the @ctx.ttname@, because the value is the local ...
- 04:58 AM Base Language Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Danut, the *6083a* has a fix for this issue? I see that Constantin reported it on #10536-15.
- 04:19 AM Base Language Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- +Danut
+Constantin - 04:18 AM Base Language Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Steps to reproduce:
* Setup a *hotel GUI* project or any dataset project, with incremental conversion.
* Do a full ... - 04:08 AM Base Language Bug #10613 (Closed): Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
09/22/2025
- 08:44 AM Base Language Bug #10519 (Review): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *63* on h2 task branch *10519a_h2*:
- Addressed code review #10519-24. - 04:30 AM Base Language Bug #10509 (Review): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 04:29 AM Base Language Bug #10509 (Internal Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 04:29 AM Base Language Bug #10509 (WIP): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 03:20 AM Base Language Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> But it can be read also by this:
> [...]
> ... so the fix is not completely correct.
... - 02:13 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Committed revision *16128* on task branch *10455a*:
- Addressed code review #10455-20.
09/12/2025
- 06:45 AM Base Language Bug #10558 (Review): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Committed revision *16163* on task branch *10558a*:
- Allow fields with XML prefix from a temp-table without NS-PREF... - 06:12 AM Base Language Bug #10558 (WIP): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Created task branch 10558a.
- 06:09 AM Base Language Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- We have the following testcase:
{{Collapse(TestSimpleReadXml.cls)... - 06:01 AM Base Language Bug #10558 (Test): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
09/11/2025
- 04:10 AM Base Language Bug #10309 (Review): DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- Committed revision *16161* on task branch *10309c*:
- Added support for handle method/properties on 'is_method_outpu... - 03:13 AM Base Language Bug #10309 (WIP): DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- Created task branch *10309c*.
I have missed a test case, when the temp-table/dataset handle is obtained using a ge...
09/10/2025
- 04:12 AM Base Language Bug #10410: Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error undo, throw is not...
- The customer application code was changed and the issue was fixed.
09/09/2025
- 08:24 AM Base Language Bug #10509: SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 4GL also returns unknown on directories, but I was fooled by ABLUnit @Assert:IsTrue@ when the result is unknown and t...
09/08/2025
- 05:11 AM Base Language Bug #10519 (Review): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *16147* on task branch *10519a*:
- Reverted last commit. Removed hasChild = true on writeChildRec... - 04:25 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Created task branch *10519a_h2* on @p2j_repo/h2@.
Committed revision *62* on h2 task branch *10519a_h2*:
- Moved ... - 03:38 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What is the code which links the child with the parent via recid? Is the parent table t... - 02:07 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Lets take a step back. Why d...
09/04/2025
- 09:28 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Lets take a step back. Why do we need in FWD for the recids to be different? What's th... - 09:18 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> There are limitations on how we can assign recid to _temp in FWD. There are changes to prop... - 06:59 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Are you saying that if you call @CREATE@ twice one after the other, for different temp-t... - 06:03 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- There is a big problem on how we generate the @recid@ field from a record:...
- 05:22 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *16146* on task branch *10519a*:
- Reset @hasChild@ flag to initial state while iterating through... - 05:19 AM Base Language Bug #10519 (WIP): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- 05:18 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Created task branch *10519*.
I have a fix for the first issue, which will come very soon.
For the second issue, the... - 04:37 AM Base Language Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Suppose we have a ProDataSet structure like this:...
- 04:25 AM Base Language Bug #10519 (Test): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
09/03/2025
- 08:13 AM Database Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Because @persistence.load@ (@Session.getImpl@) returns the cached version of the @dmo@. The cached version of the @dm...
09/02/2025
- 09:11 AM Database Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- I have checked the bundle and the results when @FIND FIRST@ is used.
When @activeBundleKey@ is first, the old record... - 03:29 AM Database Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- The full schema for @adaptivept9@ (taken from testcases project) is:...
- 02:41 AM Database Bug #10390 (Review): FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST ...
- Committed revision *16103* on task branch *10390a*:
- Addressed code review #10390-17. - 02:28 AM Database Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Response to code review #10390-17:
* the @if (hasEnteredIteration)@ conditional from @RAQ.executeImpl@ was moved bec... - 08:09 AM Base Language Bug #10509: SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- ...
- 03:00 AM Base Language Bug #10509: SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- While creating some testcases for testing some OS commands, I have encountered this issue: if you want to check the f...
- 02:57 AM Base Language Bug #10509 (Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
08/29/2025
- 08:08 AM Base Language Feature #9448: compatibility test security features
- I think it can be merged to trunk
- 06:01 AM Database Bug #10455 (Review): Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- 06:00 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Committed revision *16127* on task branch *10455a*:
- Avoid calling validation multiple times in the nested function... - 03:33 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Committed revision *16126* on task branch *10455a*:
* Moved validation from @BufferManager@ into @BlockManager.funct... - 02:44 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- The property block case works just fine, but the problem is that when there is no buffer usage into the the called fu...
08/28/2025
- 09:07 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- The changes are reverted to the state that was before @BATCH@ mode.
The synchronization does not happen when the val... - 06:39 AM Database Bug #10455 (Review): Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Committed revision *16125* on task branch *10455a*:
- Added validation when a function is called in batch assignment... - 03:33 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Thanks for code review!
I have started working on this task branch, but I think that adding the validation into th...
08/25/2025
- 01:47 AM Database Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- ChUI regression testing passed with the current changes.
Also available in: Atom