Golden Code Redmine

04/16/2026

05:43 AM Database Bug #11347 (Review): IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

11347a addressed the concerns above. Alex, please review. Artur Școlnic

04/14/2026

07:43 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Review of trunk/16514:
>
> * there is a potential NPE in @collectIndexedFields@. If @Per... Artur Școlnic

04/08/2026

06:28 AM Database Bug #11347 (WIP): IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

I had a talk with Alex. The getters are invoked only for the indexed fields, so we just have to make sure to always h... Artur Școlnic

04:32 AM Database Bug #11347 (Review): IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Artur Școlnic

04:32 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Yes, only the included fields are available, the indexes do not affect this mechanism.
Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I t... Artur Școlnic

02:24 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6629: incremental conversion for OpenClient proxy programs

Runtime testing on the customer project can be done only with the custom branch patched with the changes from 6629a. ... Artur Școlnic

04/07/2026

07:12 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Alexandru,
I committed the solution to 11301c, please review. Artur Școlnic

07:01 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

I tried reloading the buffer when the AQ is invalidated, it solved the issue. Artur Școlnic

05:33 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

I manage to come up with a recreate in a single session:
Book should have at least 2 records.... Artur Școlnic

04/06/2026

06:30 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > DO PRESELECT each Book fields (book-id isbn) no-lock:
>
> What index is used in this s... Artur Școlnic

06:17 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> This should have saved a snapshot / reference record that had both f1 and f2 hydrated.
Doe... Artur Școlnic

05:45 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

... Artur Școlnic

05:11 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Artur Școlnic wrote:
> 4GL allows fields only for preselected and presorted fetches, you cannot delete a record whil... Artur Școlnic

03:27 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Teodor, I forgot to mention something, this issue is visible only during load testing with 100 concurrent clients. Th... Artur Școlnic

03:22 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Alex, please take a look at 11301c.
+ Alexandru Artur Școlnic

05:32 AM Database Feature #11291: Improve h2 locking system

IMO, #11356 makes this task obsolete. We cannot change the locking system in PageStore (internal architecture limitat... Artur Școlnic

05:28 AM Database Feature #11291: Improve h2 locking system

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Well, don't we get unique index violations and maybe other problems otherwise? As we di... Artur Școlnic

05:24 AM Database Feature #11291: Improve h2 locking system

MVStore is great because of the superior lock acquiring algorithm, but if we synchronize all the access to meta in FW... Artur Școlnic

03:20 AM Database Bug #11356: Synchronize the access to the meta database in FWD

In a highly concurrent environment, PageStore's storage engine in H2 becomes a point of contention because of the ine... Artur Școlnic

03:16 AM Database Bug #11356 (New): Synchronize the access to the meta database in FWD

Artur Școlnic

04/03/2026

05:50 AM Database Bug #11347 (WIP): IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Artur Școlnic

05:49 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Constantin, to answer your question.
> is it guaranteed that the placeholder record still exists in the table - in o... Artur Școlnic

05:36 AM Database Bug #11347: IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

During stress testing of a customer application, IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR was unexpectedly thrown... Artur Școlnic

05:34 AM Database Bug #11347 (Review): IGNORE_FIELDS_ERROR is thrown in RAQ, extend rereadfields support

Artur Școlnic

03/27/2026

05:58 AM Database Feature #11291 (Review): Improve h2 locking system

I changed the meta db to use mvstore and fixed the unique constraint violation in @databaseConnected@ by using @merge... Artur Școlnic

04:19 AM Database Feature #11291: Improve h2 locking system

The problem is the pattern used in @databaseConnected@, currently id does @select@ -> @insert@/@update@ and assumes (... Artur Școlnic

03/26/2026

11:41 AM Database Feature #11291: Improve h2 locking system

For testing I am using a script that starts a number of concurrent batch clients that connect to the database.
With ... Artur Școlnic