Dănuț Filimon's activity
From 05/18/2026 to 06/16/2026
06/16/2026
- 10:03 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'd prefer not to do that.
>
> Please show the output that is being generated incorrectly alon...
06/15/2026
- 10:03 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Greg, is the option of adding a new token like @VAR_DEF_ITEM@ that will replace @SYMBOL@ in @VAR_DEF_LIST@? I have th...
06/12/2026
- 09:28 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Slight issues with the current way we annotate variables, for a DEFINE VARIABLE we'll just annotate the DEFINE_VARIAB...
06/11/2026
- 08:33 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- @var char[3] c1 = ["1", "2", "3"].@ also works after a few small adjustments.
Right now, I am approaching @var cha... - 07:34 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- I was getting too complicated and missed a lot of details, I should've just piggy bagged the DEFINE_VARIABLE implemen...
06/10/2026
- 09:28 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Ignore my last comment, I forgot a patch.
- 09:25 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You should be trying for something like this:
>
> [...]
>
> I've removed the annotations fo... - 08:44 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- The current problem I am working on is the definition of @var char[3] c1 = [1,2,3]@, this generates the following ast...
- 02:52 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Also, I should note that the @EQUALS@ node will need to have its type rewritten as @ASSIGN@. Loo...
06/08/2026
- 09:25 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- I've worked on the changes from the review and the only problem I am facing right now is resolving the qualified name...
06/04/2026
- 07:51 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- Committed *9767a/16564*. Added partial VAR statement support and ParserTestDriver.java to be used with harness.
I ...
06/03/2026
- 04:48 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- I ran the harness against the failing tests and found errors such as:...
05/28/2026
- 07:46 AM Base Language Feature #9767: Support the new VAR statement introduced in Progress 12.x
- I looked a lot more into the lexer and preprocessor tests, but I can't figure out how to generate the OE baselines.
...
05/27/2026
- 09:25 AM Base Language Feature #6407 (Review): name_map.xml improvements
- Committed *6407b/16578*. Added inHandleProc to override the handle and make sure TARGET-PROCEDURE is set properly.
...
05/26/2026
- 07:04 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I have some problems figuring out what is wrong with the changes from the last commit, the only difference I can find...
05/25/2026
- 04:49 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, please create a standalone test for the 16577 commit.
>
> The resolvers must n...
05/22/2026
- 10:04 AM Base Language Feature #6407 (WIP): name_map.xml improvements
- 3 tests remain to be investigated and fixed.
- 09:07 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Committed *6407b/16577*. Added 2767 error handling and fixed the remaining scenario where the function declaration is...
05/21/2026
- 07:26 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Looks good. Please also test what happens if @hpUtils@ in test2.p or in start.p is unkn... - 06:40 AM Base Language Feature #6407 (Review): name_map.xml improvements
- I committed *6407b/16576* to fix how the IN-HANDLE/local implementation are resolved.
Constantin, please take a lo... - 03:30 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please post a standalone test.
This is the test case....
05/20/2026
- 08:12 AM Base Language Feature #6407 (WIP): name_map.xml improvements
- Constantin, I found a scenario where we need the @jname@ in the LegacySignature. The following stack trace creates an...
05/19/2026
- 04:44 AM Base Language Feature #6407: name_map.xml improvements
- I got news from Serban that the runtime testing failed for a customer, I am currently investigating.
https://proj.g...
Also available in: Atom