Eric Faulhaber's activity
From 08/31/2024 to 09/29/2024
09/25/2024
- 09:21 AM Conversion Tools Bug #8967 (WIP): Remove relationship annotation from full conversion
- Increasing priority due to a customer requirement.
09/17/2024
- 12:32 PM Conversion Tools Bug #8967: Remove relationship annotation from full conversion
- Ovidiu, please support Andrei in this task as needed.
09/16/2024
- 08:40 AM Database Bug #9036 (Merge Pending): Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Please merge 9036b to trunk now.
09/13/2024
- 01:17 PM Database Bug #9036 (Merge Pending): Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- 01:17 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Please merge 9036a to trunk now.
- 11:28 AM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Ovidiu, please smoke test the GUI app for which you ran unit testing. If you can log in, open a few screens, and ther...
09/12/2024
- 12:53 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Ovidiu, please notify us when the lock release defect we discussed earlier is resolved. We will need to re-run the re...
09/11/2024
- 12:21 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- All: please proceed with the test plan.
09/10/2024
- 06:58 PM Database Bug #9036 (Review): Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Ovidiu, please post here again when the review is addressed and set this to "Internal Test" status. My points are pre...
- 06:48 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Code review 9036a/15442-15444:
Nice work, Ovidiu. My findings...
@builtin_functions.rules@ needs a history entr... - 03:25 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- As discussed in recent standups, the current plan is to defer the metadata work and finish the core refactoring for t...
09/04/2024
- 04:50 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Go ahead and move fields from @Context@ to @Tenant@ as needed. Keep in mind that all fields in @Tenant@ must be immut...
- 01:50 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- The changes in 9036a/15426 look good to me. What is left to implement for this task to be complete (not considering #...
09/03/2024
- 05:53 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Actually, I used the database name, in lowercase. That was also to make sure there are no c... - 07:54 AM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The default tenant's @Tenant@ object would be created when the @Persistence@ object is in...
09/02/2024
- 03:56 PM Database Bug #9036: Multi-tenancy: refactor the database in Persistence context-wise
- Greg Shah wrote:
> [...] The table-level annotation can help us with our implementation of shared vs multi-tenant ta...
Also available in: Atom