Eduard Soltan's activity
From 10/29/2024 to 11/27/2024
11/27/2024
- 09:46 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Greg, can I merge 8643a?
- 07:50 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Run CHUI regression tests, and they are passing.
11/26/2024
- 06:23 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Constatin wrote:
> Did you restore the database before running the tests?
yes, a couple of times.
Andrei Plu...
11/25/2024
- 02:13 PM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Andrei Plugaru wrote:
> I have run the fwdtests and, unfortunately, *it seems there are 5 regressions*. I would want... - 08:29 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- I run unitest for a large application.
Also run unittest of a large GUI app, and harness of a big rest app. - 03:24 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard, so there are no changes required for the branch?
No, there should be a change... - 02:59 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- I run the example from #9298-38 using command line, and got the same result as if running from OE.
Got the excepti...
11/22/2024
- 04:10 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Actully I think that the problematic line in this code from #8643-38....
11/21/2024
- 10:13 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> But a question: does this test still work in FWD with 8643a?
Well, not really. I cha...
11/18/2024
- 03:38 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Updated [[p2j:Chapter_27_Sorting_Query_Results#section-18]], with new index selection rule (4.1).
- 03:18 AM Database Bug #9347: Refactor the breakTie method fro temp-tables.
- This task is a follow up for #9267-44.
The way to break the tie between multiples indices choices should be refacto... - 03:12 AM Database Bug #9347 (New): Refactor the breakTie method fro temp-tables.
11/15/2024
- 10:00 AM Database Bug #9267 (Test): Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- 09:56 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Branch 9267a was merged into trunk revision 15561.
11/11/2024
- 09:31 AM Database Bug #9267 (Review): Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> Well, my 9267a only goes to revision 15527. Are we facing another "unbound" issue or did I do ...
11/08/2024
- 11:46 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Added tests cases for general index selection rules on @tests/query/index/MainIndexTests.cls@.
11/07/2024
- 09:45 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Committed on 9267a, rev. 15541.
Tested regression test projects and a large customer application unit test. Source... - 02:00 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I looked at 9267a, rev. 15525/6, but I have some difficulties understanding the logic. I wi...
11/06/2024
- 02:05 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Sorry, my branch was unbind. I pushed on 9267a, rev. 15524.
11/05/2024
- 09:54 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Radu Apetrii wrote:
> > Oh, that's great then. As long as we have the cases talked in this t... - 09:53 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> OK, then, if you agree, we'll split the work as following:
> * Eduard: create the testcases f... - 09:48 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> Oh, that's great then. As long as we have the cases talked in this task covered, I'm good.
... - 07:30 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> OK, then, if you agree, we'll split the work as following:
> * Eduard: create the testcases... - 06:40 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> I think we're going to need an example for each of these cases. If Eduard is not available r...
11/04/2024
- 10:12 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
>
> Does this mean that the order in which we define the indexes is the tie-breaker here? If s... - 07:42 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
>
> Here, Progress and FWD trunk choose @idx1@. With the 9267a changes, @idx2@ is selected.
...
11/01/2024
- 02:42 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Conversion of a customer GUI application finished successfully. Also tested unit tests, with no regression.
Pushed...
10/30/2024
- 02:18 PM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Made the necessary changes on 9267a, revision 15524.
I will redo the conversion of a customer application this eve... - 08:01 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> I'm gonna assume that I need to re-run the conversion for that customer application. I've alre... - 07:16 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- I made some changes to reflect behaviour from #9267-20 in 9267a, rev. 15523. Please review.
- 03:46 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I did analyse at the sources posted on devsrv01. Definitely, the ones generated by 9267a lo... - 10:35 AM Base Language Bug #8643 (Review): ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute prop...
- Rebased 8643a, to latest trunk. And fixed some history entries in revision 15528.
Committed on 8643a, revision 155... - 10:33 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Looking a bit more closely at the example from #8643-30, and the implementation of @BlockManager.processLegacyError@....
- 07:34 AM Base Language Bug #8643: ErrorManager not handling caught errors and error-status:error attribute properly
- Tested unittests with the changes from 8643a. It indeed solves a lot of tests in @service@ and some other modules. Bu...
10/29/2024
- 10:14 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Please review 9267a, rev. 15522.
>
> I have tests with regression changes project, and a l... - 10:07 AM Database Bug #9267 (Review): Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Please review 9267a, rev. 15522.
I have tests with regression changes project, and a large customer GUI app. The r... - 10:04 AM Database Bug #9267 (WIP): Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- 09:51 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> The point here is that @idx2@ and the @WHERE@ clause share a prefix of fields, but they are no... - 09:31 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Sure, go ahead.
- 08:54 AM Database Bug #9267: Index Selection in case of a multiple index matches.
- Added my testcases on @tests/query/index/IndexSelectionExactMatching.cls@.
Out of 13 tests:
- 6 test fails with...
Also available in: Atom