Eugenie Lyzenko's activity
From 01/10/2025 to 02/08/2025
02/07/2025
- 08:11 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15705@.
Fixed the regression from recent rebase. Not all codes from @i...
02/06/2025
- 06:59 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The rebase with trunk @15688@ stops appservers working with @TERMINFO_DIRS@ feature. The @BatchDriver@ changes in tru...
- 03:20 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Can the @terminfo_ovr@ be changed to @terminfo_override@ or @terminfo_over@?
>
> Go ahead an... - 02:44 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15688@. Updated for review to revision @15703@.
The small change adds the...
02/05/2025
- 02:07 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
>
> I see instructions in the "updated wiki":/proj.goldencode.com/projects/p2j/wiki/Patching_... - 12:44 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I'd like understand how best to position Docker to handle this. Do we want to support @TERMI... - 08:56 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15686@. New revision is @15700@.
Continue with @ChUI@ regression testing. - 08:41 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 5568a Revision 15698
>
> With this change, we can simplify the code a ...
02/04/2025
- 03:03 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Just tested with big customer application and appserver agents. Seems like works OK for both default and standalone d...
- 01:55 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568 (Review): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15698@.
Adding @TERMINFO_DIRS@ override feature to the batch mode driver. - 01:13 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568 (WIP): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> That is a problem. The admin should be able to manually (or via a script) sets up the private TE... - 12:03 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin,
> >
> > Seems like I need the assistance from you with... - 10:23 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Constantin,
Seems like I need the assistance from you with simple appserver testing config. The idea is to test th... - 09:13 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15685@. New revision is @15697@.
02/03/2025
- 04:38 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Try the links now.
Yes, the links in #5568-93 work. - 04:13 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Also: please document the additional OS insta... - 03:49 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Also: please document the additional OS installation requirements for building FWD on Linux.
I... - 12:49 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please test ChUI regression testing, batch mode and (simple) appserver support.
>
OK. I thin... - 11:48 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15684@. New revision is @15696@.
- 11:01 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 5558a Revision 15693
>
> 1. The @TerminfoHelper@ can be simplified.
... - 07:04 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15682@. New revision is @15693@.
02/02/2025
- 04:31 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15678@. New revision is @15689@.
01/31/2025
- 06:59 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15688@.
This is the notes resolution for moving @TERMINFO_DIRS@ handli... - 04:09 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> No, let's not make it more complicated.
>
> If the directory exists and has any contents, then... - 03:42 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> > We should assume the data prepared with this way are ready to be used in @ChUI@ client sess... - 01:13 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I'm going to create new class @TerminfoHelper@ inside package @com.goldencode.p2j.ui.client.chu... - 10:02 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 5568a Revisions 15685 and 15686
>
> The changes look good.
>
> I th... - 09:33 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 5568a Revisions 15685 and 15686
>
> The changes look good.
>
> I th...
01/30/2025
- 02:32 PM Harness Bug #9489: Support for different terminal encodings
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie - did you find the change working for you ? especially regarding #7657
Yes, your fi... - 09:08 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ rebased with trunk revision @15676@. New revision is @15686@.
- 07:39 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15681@.
This is note 3 resolution with added error handling/logging fo...
01/29/2025
- 03:09 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15680@.
This is the notes 1 and 2 resolutions and some minor code impr... - 01:39 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > 2. It is OK to default to the @libp2j.so@ directory BUT we should allow the user to optionall... - 11:58 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 5568a Revisions 15672 through 15679
>
> Overall, it is good.
>
> 1.... - 07:01 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15672@. Rebased with trunk revision @15671@, new revision is @15679@.
... - 09:48 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15671@.
Fixed building issue for Windows with condition check.
01/28/2025
- 06:51 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15670@.
This update changes only @build.xml@. But all preparation step...
01/27/2025
- 07:57 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think the only case when data embedding in @libp2j.so@ is not convenient is the case when ter...
01/25/2025
- 07:44 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15667@. Rebased with recent trunk @15663@, new revision is @15668@.
Th...
01/24/2025
- 02:51 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to do this from Java code? We could (as part of the build) include the @te... - 08:51 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > For the @TERMINFO@ seems like I've found a way to integrate @TERMINFO@ data into @libp2j.so@ co... - 07:47 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15666@.
Just clean up from commented code used in debug/testing.
Gr...
01/23/2025
- 04:49 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We can't remove the patched ncurses support in this branch. Otherwise when customers move to thi... - 04:12 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15661@. Rebased with recent trunk @15661@, new revision is @15665@.
Th... - 09:13 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15656@. Rebased with recent trunk @15658@, new ...
01/22/2025
- 05:37 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15656@. Rebased with recent trunk @15658@, new revision is @15660@.
Sm... - 12:36 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I received the below when I checked out *5568a* and ran @ant all sheet:war archive@... I kno... - 09:14 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I'm investigating the possible ways when @t... - 08:48 AM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Guys,
I'm investigating the possible ways when @terminfo.zip@ is not delivered for the production system. Can some... - 09:38 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568 (Review): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The @5568a@ updated for review to revision @15655@.
This update has complete set of @FWD@ changes to implement @TE... - 08:29 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Created task branch @5568a@ from trunk revision @15654@.
Preparing to commit @FWD@ related updates.
01/21/2025
- 05:24 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It is a good idea to use @jar@.
>
> I'm also OK if we want to modify the @client.sh@ and @serv... - 12:18 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- One possible implementation approach is to use @unzip@ tool inside native code to extract the terminfo archive. This ...
- 12:15 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > OK. The implementation plan is:
> > 1. Include @terminfo@ into ... - 09:09 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > A production environment wi...
01/20/2025
- 06:18 PM Testing Bug #9525: Testcases: incorrect placeholders in directory.xml.template and other configuration pr...
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The fragments are combined with @com.goldencode.p2j.directory.DirectoryCopy@, so perhaps tha... - 04:11 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> A production environment will not have a @deploy/lib@ or whatever structure. The only f... - 03:31 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I think the good location is client side, @ConsoleHelper.initChui()@ method:...
- 02:03 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is a possibility, though we would probably put it into @deploy/@ since most of the project d... - 12:43 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- I have confirmation the @TERMINFO_DIRS@ based approach works for having independent terminfo database. Moreover we ha...
01/18/2025
- 12:18 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The problem with this approach is it only works in development environments. In production syste... - 07:52 PM Runtime Infrastructure Support #5568 (WIP): implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides
- The solution plan:
1. Take the currently patched @xterm@, @vt220@, @vt320@ files and put them into @terminfo@ subd... - 09:40 PM User Interface Bug #7657: 8-bit character entry problem in ChUI
- The @7657a@ rebased with trunk @15652@, new revision is @15678@.
Just rebase with new trunk. Passed @ChUI@ regress...
01/17/2025
- 03:53 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It can be combined.
OK. - 02:39 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg,
What is the priority for the task? Should I create @2660a@ branch to commit the required changes and move to... - 07:51 AM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, that does sound quite good.
>
> How do we check to see if @pthreads@ is already on in an ... - 09:26 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Status update. I have executed one full @ChUI@ regression cycle for @FWD@ compiled with pthread capable @NCURSES@. Th...
01/16/2025
- 02:45 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Status update.
I have finished 2 rounds of main loop for @ChUI@ regression testing with @libp2j.so@ that does *not... - 08:59 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have tested the Hotel ChUI application with original NCURSES built with pthread option enable...
01/15/2025
- 10:21 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I would like to say yes. But I can not(for 100%). What I see is the @NCURSES@ inits and uses in...
01/14/2025
- 07:06 AM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> #307 is the original issue that made the requirement for @auto_getch_refresh()@.
>
> > The @pt... - 08:25 PM User Interface Bug #7657 (Review): 8-bit character entry problem in ChUI
01/13/2025
- 06:37 PM User Interface Bug #7657: 8-bit character entry problem in ChUI
- The @7657a@ rebased with trunk @15635@, new revision is @15661@.
Continue different regression testing. The @ChUI@... - 06:35 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Made a set if @ChUI@ regression testing. A lot enough I guess to make conclusion. The *not*... - 06:29 PM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Made a set if @ChUI@ regression testing. A lot enough I guess to make conclusion. The *not* patched @NCURSES@ (disabl...
01/10/2025
- 10:54 AM User Interface Support #2660: evaluate if the NCURSES 5.7 "threading improvements" can be made to work for P2J s...
- Update for experiments with @pthreads@ enabled @libp2j.so@. Some preconditions and info.
1. The @NCURSES@ base is ... - 09:48 AM User Interface Bug #7657: 8-bit character entry problem in ChUI
- The @7657a@ updated to revision @15653@, rebased with trunk @15634@, new revision is @15660@.
The update contains ...
Also available in: Atom