Dănuț Filimon's activity
From 06/22/2025 to 07/21/2025
07/21/2025
- 09:47 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I see the ChUI project used @datanames.xml@ which also changes how the converted project sees the bufname and filenam...
- 08:57 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'll have to work on the conversion changes a bit more, the bufname is not the right one to use in this case. I've fo...
- 07:34 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I implemented the conversion changes necessary, this works by emitting a DataModelObject array before the Object arra...
07/18/2025
- 06:50 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > I can't come up with any idea on how to let the FindQu... - 03:51 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 06:06 AM Conversion Tools Bug #9917: Fileset not ignoring case
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> The customer application converted, but the build failed. Some temp-table dmos were missing a... - 05:02 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I did a ChUI conversion and the project built with no issues, I noticed both the array and variable FindQuery types b...
07/17/2025
- 06:59 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I committed *6709a/16052*. Added FOR_LOOP_WHILE and DO_TO_WHILE reports, fixed database joins report. (refs: #6709)
... - 05:24 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Added a fix to *6709a/16051*, only reports are affected. I also got the report results for the ChUI application.
!ch... - 03:20 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- One solution would be to consider all FindQuery nested when its buffers can be found in the @openBuffers@ and we are ...
- 03:12 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If we are implementing a runtime mode for this detection, we would expect to use the @Transaction... - 03:19 AM Conversion Tools Bug #9917: Fileset not ignoring case
- --- deleted, the comment was for another issue
- 02:28 AM Conversion Tools Bug #9917: Fileset not ignoring case
- The customer application converted, but the build failed. Some temp-table dmos were missing and might be caused by so...
07/16/2025
- 06:31 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I'm looking into the runtime changes and how the blocks are converted at the moment, just to ... - 06:03 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Ovidiu/Alexandru, please review 6709a for the report changes.
- 05:20 AM Database Support #6709 (Review): track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'm looking into the runtime changes and how the blocks are converted at the moment, just to understand what I can us...
- 04:10 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I rebased *6709a* to latest *trunk/16046* and committed *16050*. Added nested find block type reports.
- 03:17 AM Database Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- 10111a changes should also be ported to *7156e*.
- 03:12 AM Conversion Tools Bug #9917: Fileset not ignoring case
- There's a single customer application left to test to get 9917a into the merge queue and tomorrow I expect to get the...
07/15/2025
- 05:54 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I've managed to get a report for nested FINDs in FOR EACH statements, the report works in the following way:
# there... - 04:04 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Is this ready for review? Or are you actively working on #6709-47?
I'm working on #6709-...
07/14/2025
- 07:19 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- DO blocks are quite tricky, those blocks do not have an instvarid and in some cases I can get out of the expected blo...
07/11/2025
- 08:58 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- To do:
* add a report where nested find queries are displayed based on the type of block, but only if the block refe... - 07:40 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed *6709a/16034*. Included UNIQUE finds in the report, I missed those previously.
- 06:54 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> * Nested FIND: 13 first, 6 next, 5 last, 5 current, 3 where (this is confusing a bit because ... - 06:35 AM Database Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Fixed #9078-113 in *9078b/16039*. We did not emit the find query as a variable when we had a block in the queue, but ...
- 05:21 AM Database Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Found the issue from #9078-113 again, but I got a reliable reproduction this time. It seems that when I use the array...
07/10/2025
- 09:24 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I ran the reports for hotel and got:
* Nested FIND: 13 first, 6 next, 5 last, 5 current, 3 where (this is confusing ... - 08:02 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed *6709a/16032*. Extended the functionality of the nested_find annotation and added more detailed reports:
... - 02:14 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I got a message from Razvan that he converted the ChUI project, but the "convert" command was s...
07/09/2025
- 08:00 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 07:16 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > and there are different ways to get the file-set?
>
> What do you mean?
ChUI project uses... - 03:21 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- I got a message from Razvan that he converted the ChUI project, but the "convert" command was skipped. This is becaus...
07/08/2025
- 09:47 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Alex, I took a look at the last example from #6709-38 and only the FOR EACH find has the nested_find annotation. Are ...
- 09:05 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'll mention a few ideas from the latest discussions so that I do not lose track of them:
* Tracking nested finds in... - 07:55 AM Database Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I added 9078b to my ETF conversion queue, it will take a while to get through it.
- 07:54 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I've managed to fix the issue, I've also noticed that CAN-FINDs were ignored and AdaptiveFind... - 07:23 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've managed to fix the issue, I've also noticed that CAN-FINDs were ignored and AdaptiveFinds were also counted. I'l...
- 06:24 AM Database Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've found an issue while converting ETF:...
07/07/2025
- 07:17 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Rebased *9078b* to latest *trunk/16028*, the branch is now at revision *16037*.
- 02:39 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, does @AdaptiveFind@ still emit properly? This is the @FIND FIRST. REPEAT: FIND N... - 06:44 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- I committed *10208a/16007*. Added IncrementalCvtRunMode and used to skip most of the phases that involve the database...
07/04/2025
- 02:20 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- In our weekly meeting, I mentioned that I would not modify how the M0, M1, F2 and F3 modes are used. I decided to tak...
07/03/2025
- 07:57 AM Database Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Committed *9078b/16012*. In case of a DO block that is also a loop, ensure that a block/inner block with "instvarid" ...
- 06:17 AM Database Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- There's a scenario when using a DO block as a loop and there is no "instvarid" to attach the array, this causes the c...
07/02/2025
- 08:56 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My only question is why would the metadata schema be bypassed in profile mode. I understand it w... - 06:41 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256 (Review): improved profile support
- Committed *6256a/15946* for review, the branch contains:
* The NPE fix for the issue mentioned in #6256-97 - reintro...
07/01/2025
- 09:12 AM Conversion Tools Feature #7180 (WIP): create a centralized manager for the conversion list and per-file/project st...
- I'll put this into WIP until 5586a (#5586) is merged, the purpose is to get 7180a rebased to latest trunk which conta...
- 08:04 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- The issue with the database is actually related to how the default profile in SchemaCOnfig is set, the root cause is ...
- 06:05 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- The global schema should be used by a profile only when none of the active profiles have a schema defined, this is th...
- 02:43 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256 (WIP): improved profile support
- 02:43 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > If a profile contains any schema at all, then the top-level namespaces ...
06/30/2025
- 07:29 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- Greg, the skipDBSchema is quite old. I suggest removing it and using the @schema@ flag to do the job.
- 06:24 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- #10208-13 can be achieved by correctly setting CvtRunMode.skipDBSchema, I made it protected and did the following for...
- 05:34 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- I created *10208a* from *trunk/16005* and committed an initial version in *10208a/16006*. The changes are for #10208-9.
- 03:54 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- I've made a few changes as mentioned in #10208-9, but I am wondering if there are any other conversion steps I should...
- 02:26 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Artur found a regression while converting a customer application, currently investigating.
I... - 02:18 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Artur found a regression while converting a customer application, currently investigating.
- 02:14 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256: improved profile support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If a profile contains any schema at all, then the top-level namespaces are ignored. I think that...
06/27/2025
- 09:12 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208 (WIP): do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- 09:12 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- My current implementation works like this:
# @SchemaLoader.importSchema()@ should call @ConversionData.saveFileHash(... - 03:29 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't object, but can we just add the schemata to the FILE_SIGNATURE table?
Yes, I will do t... - 09:01 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I committed *9078b/16010* to address #9078-101 and #9078-102.
- 04:16 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I looked at 9078b / r16008.
>
> The code looks pretty much solid. But it's difficult to ...
06/26/2025
- 09:06 AM Conversion Tools Bug #10208: do not convert the schema in incremental mode if it hasn't changed
- As far as I can tell, there doesn't seem to be any information (e.g. hash) for the schema file in the cvtdb database....
- 07:25 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Rebased *9078b* to latest *trunk/16003*, the branch is now at revision *16008*.
- 06:57 AM Database Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Committed *9078b/15974*, Added rules to count the number of FindQuery instances in a top level block, but also added ...
06/25/2025
- 09:05 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I managed to get a working version for #9078-95 and started working on a version where it use... - 08:18 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I managed to get a working version for #9078-95 and started working on a version where it uses an array in case too m...
- 04:56 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Current rule-set:...
- 04:53 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Constantin mentioned that I could count the number of FindQueries for each top level block and emit the array only wh...
- 04:02 AM Base Language Bug #9996 (Test): Object references should be decremented at the nearest block instead of the top...
- Branch 9538d was merged to trunk revision 15998 and archived.
- 02:30 AM Base Language Bug #9996: Object references should be decremented at the nearest block instead of the top-level ...
- 9538d passed all regression tests and can be merged.
06/24/2025
- 03:37 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6256 (Review): improved profile support
- I've tested hotel with 2-4 profiles and found no other issues. Greg/Constantin, please review.
#6256-47 is already...
06/23/2025
- 09:15 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've made some progress, but I will have to refactor all of the changes for the FindQuery. If I am using an array to ...
- 03:11 AM Database Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I was thinking about @fqueryArray[0] = new FindQuery();@ initialization. To have a more com...
Also available in: Atom