Eduard Soltan's activity
From 06/26/2025 to 07/25/2025
07/25/2025
- 09:32 AM Database Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Committed on 9456b, rev. 16071.
Revision *16071* contains changes from 10283a, this fixes the @coalesce@, and fix...
07/22/2025
- 12:33 PM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard Soltan wrote:
> > Committed on 6457a, rev. 16066.
> >
> > - Emit @Transaction... - 12:12 PM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Committed on 6457a, rev. 16066.
- Emit @Transaction.FULL@ parameter when target of copy-lob operation is a persist...
07/21/2025
- 01:03 PM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- First major problem found, it is common for around 100 tests....
- 12:38 PM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> From the wiki:
>
> > All files from @tests/copy_lob/support/data@ should be moved to @deploy/c... - 10:29 AM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- After solving all configuration issues, I was left only with assertion errors which should be investigated....
- 08:26 AM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- After creating the following path in @deploy/client/tests/copy_lob/support/data@, I get the following results:
<pr... - 08:07 AM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Got the following after running @testcases/tests/copy_lob/@...
- 07:36 AM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The BOM handling has a testcase already written. See @testcases/copy_lob/tests/bom.p@.
Greg/S... - 07:48 AM Base Language Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Rebased 4602a branch.
- 05:46 AM Base Language Bug #10314: Implementation of Progress.Lang.Class
- This is what is left to implement in @Progress.Lang.Class@:
- Progress.Reflect.Constructor
- Progress.Reflect.Eve... - 05:46 AM Base Language Bug #10314 (New): Implementation of Progress.Lang.Class
- 04:54 AM Database Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Committed on 9456a, rev. 16089. Added some udfs functions overloads, and small functions fix ups. Only @sqlserver/udf...
07/15/2025
- 11:12 AM Database Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Ovidiu, looking at the udfs tests I found a couple of problems:
1) When creating the udfs aliases, we get with ref... - 08:09 AM Database Bug #10288: Encrypted connetion to SQL Server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Is there any configuration specific on the setup of SQLServer ?
I just setup the SQL ...
07/14/2025
- 02:48 PM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I think the cause for this exception is the absence from @build.properties@ of the definiti... - 01:09 PM Database Bug #10288: Encrypted connetion to SQL Server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Lets make this decision only after we find what's needed to make the secure connection... - 09:12 AM Database Bug #10288: Encrypted connetion to SQL Server
- In a development environment should we use a certificate or skip the the certificate validation?
- 05:12 AM Database Bug #10288: Encrypted connetion to SQL Server
- SQL Server is running on a virtual machine. I want to connect to the server instance from my local environment (Ubunt...
- 04:42 AM Database Bug #10288 (New): Encrypted connetion to SQL Server
07/09/2025
- 12:17 PM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Tried to import the import the testcases database in sql server and got the following error....
07/08/2025
- 09:41 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> I do not know (most likely not yet) whether 9457c was also rebased. Therefore they are ... - 09:26 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- I think there is a issue with some @_meta@ dmos.
The following field in @_meta.MetaDb@ dmo:...
07/07/2025
- 02:32 PM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Manage to set up Hotel Gui with connection to a SQL Server instance running on a virtual machine. Did a smoke test wi...
07/04/2025
- 05:33 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Added 3 more SQL test files to @testcases/udfs/t-sql@.
Committed on 9456a, rev. 16042 - 16043, fix ups of @tostrin... - 01:37 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Committed functions fixups on 9456a, rev. 16040.
- 04:09 AM Database Bug #10195 (Test): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 10195a was merged to trunk 16024 and archived.
07/03/2025
- 10:48 AM Database Bug #10083 (Internal Test): Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- 10083a was merged to trunk rev 16023 and archived.
- 10:30 AM Database Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> ETF testing passed.
>
> Is there anything else to test?
Stefanel tested another cu... - 10:35 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Adopted the sql tests for T-SQL and posted on @testcases/udfs/t-sql@.
- 10:31 AM Database Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Testing performed the 10195 branch:
- smoke tests of a GUI application ☑️
- smoke and unit tests of a large GUI a... - 07:52 AM Database Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Word tables should theoretically work now. All I need to do is to test them on a real te...
07/02/2025
- 02:32 AM Database Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I'll run ETF with this. Eduard, what's the state of the #10083-17 tests?
Passed with...
07/01/2025
- 04:09 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Question, can the tests from @testcases/udfs@ be adopted to SQL Server and properly tested?
- 01:43 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eduard,
>
> Do you have any pending changes to 9456a as part of this task?
For now n...
06/27/2025
- 08:05 AM Database Bug #10195 (Review): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 05:16 AM Database Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Committed on 10195a, rev. 15997.
Changed iterateReleaseOverrideScope into a stack of scopes. A new level is added... - 03:55 AM Database Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> This is a problem, right?
Of course this is a problem, I am currently giving a try to... - 03:24 AM Database Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > It is not affected since the RecordBuffer will not be included in the of the nested for-e... - 02:51 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Changed udfs names and comments formats in *rev. 16007*. I confused the formats with @mariadb@ udfs, and it is a bit ...
06/26/2025
- 10:01 AM Database Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am OK with the changes in 10195a.
>
> The point here is that the buffer can have its s... - 08:56 AM Database Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Rebased to latests trunk, and performed the following tests:
- smoke tests of a GUI application ☑️
- smoke and un... - 05:07 AM Database Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Committed on 9456a, rev. *16006*.
Add most of the remaining udfs. There still some edge cases to handle, especiall...
Also available in: Atom