Eduard Soltan's activity
From 08/25/2025 to 09/23/2025
09/23/2025
- 04:17 AM Database Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...
- I think I found a problem in rev. 16164.
In @XmlImport.resolveTableByXmlName@ the current context should be used a... - 03:10 AM Database Bug #10611 (Review): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time
- 03:09 AM Database Bug #10611 (WIP): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time
- Committed solution on 10611a, rev. 16180.
- 02:51 AM Database Bug #10611: Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time
- I have the following test case:...
- 02:42 AM Database Bug #10611 (Review): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time
09/22/2025
- 03:17 AM Database Bug #10590 (Review): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- Committed on 10590a, rev. 16176. Created new method that will match exactly the index name in the table name.
- 02:48 AM Database Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> Instead, please use the @SchemaDictionary.getIndex(NameNode, name)@ or to calculate ...
09/19/2025
- 10:25 AM Database Bug #9763 (Review): xml-node-name buffer option
- 10:25 AM Database Bug #9763 (WIP): xml-node-name buffer option
- 10:24 AM Database Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option
- Exporting of child buffer (in a dataset relation) is using the attributes from @TempTableSchema@, when it should swit...
09/18/2025
- 08:18 AM Database Bug #10590 (Review): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- 08:18 AM Database Bug #10590 (WIP): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- Committed on 10590a, rev. 16174.
Now the indices of the model temp-table are added to the main temp-table.
I al... - 06:32 AM Database Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...
- I have created the following dataset structure, one thing to note that @Second@ table has a relationship with with @I...
09/17/2025
- 02:47 PM Database Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- I think I found the problem why the indices from model table are not taken into consideration, this the culprit code ...
- 06:37 AM Database Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
- The following example:...
- 06:33 AM Database Bug #10590 (Test): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table
09/12/2025
- 09:10 AM Database Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...
- I have the following test case:...
- 09:00 AM Database Bug #10560 (Closed): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspo...
09/10/2025
- 09:56 AM Testing Bug #10547 (Rejected): Order of unit test classes execution inside a package
- 08:39 AM Database Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am OK with the changes.
>
> * @setLocked@ should always be set to false. It is basica... - 07:56 AM Database Bug #10542 (Review): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- 07:56 AM Database Bug #10542 (WIP): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- Committed on 10542a, rev. 16160.
- 06:38 AM Database Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Please test this assumption to confirm or infirm my assumption.
I have the following tes... - 06:26 AM Database Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> <notextile>@</notextile>Alex: @prepareBuffer()@ calls @buffer.flush()@. The @flush()@ (@val... - 05:08 AM Database Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
>
> Just a heads-up: in FWD, the newly created records are *flushed* to the database if all... - 04:17 AM Database Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- I have found the following test case. Please note that I defined on @book4@ table a WRTIE TRIGGER that just message *...
- 03:58 AM Database Bug #10542 (Test): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record
- 04:14 AM Base Language Bug #10410 (Closed): Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error undo, thr...
- 04:14 AM Base Language Bug #10410 (Internal Test): Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error un...
- 02:22 AM Base Language Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> @QUOTER(d)@ returns @"25/09/09"@ instead of the expected @"2025/09/09"@. Note that @S...
09/09/2025
- 08:46 AM Base Language Bug #10538 (Review): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Committed on 10538a, rev. 16154.
Use @toStringMessage@ in qouterWorker in @datetime@ and @datetime-tz@. - 08:15 AM Base Language Bug #10538 (WIP): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- 07:56 AM Base Language Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Found a different behaviour between 4GL and FWD in the following test case:...
- 07:51 AM Base Language Bug #10538 (Test): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- 07:26 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Will this change be compatible with current database, right? But it will simply be slower.
... - 06:54 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Did this happen only with run-time testing? The fix only include DDL changes ... were the... - 05:51 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Testing of all customer applications has passed with 10480a.
09/08/2025
- 08:15 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Review of 10385a:
>
> * Mind that @cursor.@ is viable is cursor is not null (i.e. the qu... - 02:04 AM Database Bug #10526 (Review): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
- Committed on 10526a, rev. 16148.
- 01:47 AM Database Bug #10526 (WIP): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
- I have the following test case:...
- 01:37 AM Database Bug #10526 (Closed): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
09/05/2025
- 06:53 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Hmm, you are right. But this should still hold for Locator, right? So @trimToTableCount@ sh... - 06:03 AM Database Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is there anything left to do on this task, or can we close it?
@CAN-READ@ runtime support... - 05:44 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Added @tests/table/index/TestSuite.cls@ unit tests.
From my observation, I noticed that @recid desc@ is used only ...
09/04/2025
- 09:06 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Review of 10385a:
>
Committed changes to handle review issues on rev. 16094.
> * In... - 03:05 AM Database Bug #10385 (Review): Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- I tried removing the following code in @CompoundQuery.retrieveImpl@:...
09/03/2025
- 02:34 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- *Question*, when a call to @Cursor.getResult@ is made with the cursor positioned between the rows (lets say at @posit...
09/02/2025
- 03:12 AM Database Bug #10480 (Review): Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- 03:12 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- I have encountered this case in a regression tests, only there @find prev tt1 use-index desc_idx no-lock no-error@ qu...
09/01/2025
- 10:17 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Experimented a bit with the query a scrolling query....
- 08:54 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- There is a regression in Chui regression tests project. In the current implementation, @recid asc@ is added to the @s...
- 06:08 AM Database Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * @longchar.write@ - what if the existing longchar instance already has the codepage s...
08/29/2025
- 05:27 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Ah, I see. @CompoundQuery@ does a NEXT and forces its AQ to load that second row, but AQ... - 04:10 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Exactly. If the first component (EACH) has a cursor with ids [1, 2, 3], then @loadByValue... - 01:58 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Committed on 10385a, rev. 16091.
@repositionByID@ is performed only in certain cases, added additional @reposition... - 12:42 AM Database Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> * I don't think the changes are right (or maybe I am misinterpreting something). The @repoC...
08/28/2025
- 03:45 AM Base Language Bug #10406 (Test): Wrong parameter mode for buffers passed to a constructor
- 10406a was merged to trunk and archived.
- 03:40 AM Database Bug #10398 (Test): Incorrect base data type used in buffer dereference
- 10398a was merged to trunk and archived.
- 02:38 AM Database Bug #10480 (Review): Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- 02:37 AM Database Bug #10480 (WIP): Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Committed on 10480a, revision 16133.
Excluded descending order from recid component from DDL and FQL generation.
08/27/2025
- 08:56 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Unfortunately I didn't find any testcases related to this.
- 08:52 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- The only places where I could find @(pKeyAscend ? "asc" : "desc")@ mentioned is #7414-14 and #1666-15.
Ovidiu wrot... - 07:35 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> Do you remember why in @SortCriterion.parse@, when adding @recid@ to the sort ... - 07:18 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- Tomasz,
Do you remember why in @SortCriterion.parse@, when adding @recid@ to the sort criteria an @asc/desc@ is go... - 05:52 AM Database Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
- ...
- 05:46 AM Database Bug #10480 (Test): Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component
08/25/2025
- 01:45 PM Database Bug #10470 (WIP): Wrong order of records fetching when index modification
- ...
- 01:39 PM Database Bug #10470 (Rejected): Wrong order of records fetching when index modification
Also available in: Atom