Teodor Gorghe's activity
From 02/21/2026 to 03/22/2026
03/20/2026
- 09:17 AM Database Feature #9305: Replace begins with interval based conditional
- This is one difference between @BEGINS@ and @range check@, on @BASIC@ collation:...
- 08:07 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- On ChUI regression tests, there is one unexpected test which fails now. I am investigating this once the ChUI regress...
- 07:02 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16428* on task branch *9383c*:
- Fixed SQLServer issue (set the limit to be 0). - 06:52 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have found where the @LIMIT@ is inserted, and that is because the @maxLimit@ is set. I will set it to 0 since is no...
- 06:38 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- There is actually a regression from *9383c* on *SQLServer*.
The issue comes from the fact that you can't use @OFFSET... - 04:20 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16427* on task branch *9383c*:
- Changes to address #9383-129 observation (no functional differe...
03/18/2026
- 06:54 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- The @hotel_gui@ already has the new JDK debug options.
- 06:53 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Yes, these options were introduced long ago, since JDK 1.5.
- 03:13 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- All the changes should be compatible with JDK17.
03/16/2026
- 02:37 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Addressed the code review #9383-127 in +9383c / r16426+.
03/13/2026
- 09:22 AM Base Language Bug #10978: Conversion NPE when creating a temp-table with LIKE that uses a different primary index
- Regression testing has passed.
- 08:54 AM Database Bug #10772: NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- All testing was done and the branch is ready to be merged to trunk.
- 05:26 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- *Ovidiu*, please take a look into the changes. Please tell if this is alright.
- 05:22 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *1832* on *xfer testcases*:
- Added tests for BatchResults (#9383).
Committed revision *16423*... - 02:48 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Status from yesterday:
- I have tested different queries, outer-join, with 2 or more components, query with only one... - 02:29 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Eugenie: Please review the changes in branch FWD 9686a.
> >
>
> ...
03/12/2026
- 08:04 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16422* in task branch *9383c*:
- When possible, fetch the records in batch by PK.
I will do s... - 05:59 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have tested #11154 and now it takes 2 minutes (from 4 minutes).
- 05:24 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have great news.
I have tested #9383 with PK fetching in batches, and I see very noticible changes in performance.... - 04:42 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I think the easiest solution for this is to fetch the records in batches, by PK (eg. @IN@ syntax from SQL). This will...
- 07:43 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- Branch 9686a was merged into harness trunk as rev. 41 and archived.
03/11/2026
- 09:29 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I can confirm that #11154 is caused by fetching smaller batches instead of one with bigger batch size.
Suppose you... - 08:31 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- There is no dynamic mode, which I have thought.
The issue from #11154 comes from the fact that the @Session@ cache i... - 08:00 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have managed to get the #11154 up and running, but I see that there is a regression also with 9383c (baseline time ...
- 07:12 AM Base Language Support #11284: design discussion for how we would implement support for calling .NET libraries
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> From a conversion POV, I wouldn't want to emit reflection-style code. Instead, I think ... - 06:08 AM Base Language Support #11284: design discussion for how we would implement support for calling .NET libraries
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We can't implement exclusively server-side, for true compatibility the implementation will need t... - 05:17 AM Base Language Support #11284: design discussion for how we would implement support for calling .NET libraries
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I haven't look at what is now available for calling .NET from Java. But, we need to con... - 03:25 AM Base Language Support #11284: design discussion for how we would implement support for calling .NET libraries
- This seems an interesting topic.
There are multiple free ways which you can call .NET libraries:
- @JVM <--(JNI)-->...
03/10/2026
- 02:23 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Also, I have a question. For web clients to connect on UDS, you need to use revision *16459*.
I think you are using ... - 02:17 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- I will also considering testing the scenario which you are trying, to see if there is something else.
- 02:15 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Server has this config; again, is the secure_prot, secure and insecure_port required?
@n...
03/06/2026
- 07:00 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Please also take in consideration the fact that for database UDS, we still use @junixsocket@.
This was introduced fo... - 06:52 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275 (Review): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD clien...
- 06:52 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16461* on task branch *11275a*:
- Added *javadocs* and reverted @AppServerHelper@ changes.
Co... - 05:18 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> > Yes, the same file is used by all clients and appserver and al... - 05:10 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Yes, the same file is used by all clients and appserver and all data transfer is done in *memory*.
UDS can simulat... - 04:49 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> More, these files need to be cleaned (by the FWD server) when the client terminates, oth... - 04:42 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Next: is @p2j.net.SessionListener.terminate@ notification still working?
Yes, is stil... - 03:53 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16460* on task branch *11275a*:
- Added probing mechanism which guarantees that only one instanc... - 02:21 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Committed revision *16459* on task branch *11275a*:
- Allow only UDS clients to authenticate on the process account....
03/05/2026
- 10:08 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- Created task branch *11275a*.
Committed revision *16458* on task branch *11275a*:
- Make Appservers and FWD client ... - 09:51 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275: Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client and server
- I will commit the changes soon, I need to fix the web clients real quick.
- 06:02 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275 (WIP): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD client a...
- There are two types of *Sockets* available on the major operating systems @Windows/Linux/MacOS@:
- Network Sockets ... - 05:44 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #11275 (Review): Add UDS (Unix Domain Socket) support for communication between FWD clien...
02/27/2026
- 05:34 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Ok, thanks!
- 05:30 AM Database Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian, do you have any status update?
Also available in: Atom