FWD » Core Development » Base Language

Constantin Asofiei wrote:

These LAST/FIRST-ASYNC-REQUEST attributes are currently supported in FWD only in for the SERVER handle. This is undocumented, and looks like it also is supported at the SESSION.

For conversion, what needs to be done:

• extract the getFirstAsyncRequest and getLastAsyncRequest methods from p2j.util.Server into another interface
• change SessionUtils to implement this interface

I see that in SessionUtils all methods are static. In case it will implement an interface should make getFirstAsyncRequest and getLastAsyncRequest non-static methods.
And SessionUtil.getFirstAsyncRequest and SessionUtil.getLastAsyncRequest could not be emitted.

Eduard Soltan wrote:

I see that in SessionUtils all methods are static. In case it will implement an interface should make getFirstAsyncRequest and getLastAsyncRequest non-static methods.

No, register the interface to asHandle. The methods will be static in SessionUtils.

Added conversion support on 9819a, rev. 15806.

• SessionUtils
  • return (handle) handle.UNKNOWN_ARGUMENT; is not OK - you need to return new handle().
• AsyncRequestAttributes
  • please fix the history entry and copyright year
  • the javadoc is wrong, this is not only for SESSION, is also for Server handle

Constantin Asofiei wrote:

Review for 9819a rev 15806:

• SessionUtils
  • return (handle) handle.UNKNOWN_ARGUMENT; is not OK - you need to return new handle().
• AsyncRequestAttributes
  • please fix the history entry and copyright year
  • the javadoc is wrong, this is not only for SESSION, is also for Server handle

Fixed review issues and changed the copyright year of all modified files.

Constantin, should I perform a conversion of a large GUI application overnight as a regression test?

I have made conversion of Regression test project, and it went fine.

Eduard Soltan wrote:

Constantin, should I perform a conversion of a large GUI application overnight as a regression test?

I have made conversion of Regression test project, and it went fine.

Go ahead.

I had a problem with my workstation and had to redo the conversion. I performed the conversion with 9818a of a large GUI application, and there are no conversion difference.

Actually 9773a is in trunk, please merge now.

9819a was merged to trunk rev. 15831 and archived.

• start program:
  

  def var h as handle.
  def var ha as handle.
  
  procedure procAsync.
     message "a server" h:first-async-request h:last-async-request.
     message "a session" session:first-async-request session:last-async-request.
     pause 1.
  end.
  
  create server h.
  // message h:connect("-AppService catest -sessionModel Session-free").
  message h:connect("-URL http://localhost:8810/apsv -sessionModel Session-free"). // change this to have a PASOE connection
  run a.p on server h asynchronous set ha event-procedure "procAsync".
  message "b server" h:first-async-request h:last-async-request.
  message "b session" session:first-async-request session:last-async-request.
  wait-for procedure-complete of ha.
  message h:disconnect().
  delete object h.
  

• a.p
  

  message "a session" session:first-async-request session:last-async-request view-as alert-box.
  
  message "running" view-as alert-box .
  pause 4.
  
  

Eduard, please try to run the above test with 12.8 OpenEdge.

Do I have the change message h:connect("-URL http://localhost:8810/apsv -sessionModel Session-free"). the connection string somehow?

Eduard Soltan wrote:

Do I have the change message h:connect("-URL http://localhost:8810/apsv -sessionModel Session-free"). the connection string somehow?

If you want to run in OE, yes. Otherwise, for FWD, it depends on how your directory.xml app_services is configured.