Activity
From 10/26/2014 to 11/24/2014
11/20/2014
- 09:15 AM Feature #1628: fix any incompatibilities or missing features of NO-ECHO support
- Please provide more information about the conversion problem(s) that occurred.
I would be surprised if the convers... - 09:10 AM Feature #1628: fix any incompatibilities or missing features of NO-ECHO support
- From Evgeny:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Status Report
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 02:28:03 +03...
11/13/2014
- 09:05 AM Feature #27 (Closed): implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- 08:50 AM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- Both conversion and main runtime regression testing has passed. Only spurious issues in tc_job_clock_005 and tc_job_...
11/12/2014
- 03:12 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- I forgot the update again...
- 03:11 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- This is merged up with 10652 and I have started regression testing. Conversion and runtime regression testing on the...
11/11/2014
- 11:22 AM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- And the update...
- 11:22 AM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- This version is merged with 10651. I'm going to do a regression testing run, but there are conflicting changes in #2...
11/10/2014
- 03:17 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- Here is a version with enhanced javadoc that provides more detailed guidance for using @UnimplementedFeature@.
- 02:43 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is the update with the suggested changes.
The only comment I have is that if UnimplementedF... - 02:27 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- This is the update with the suggested changes.
- 01:54 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- > I think we should make this part of our standard, so all APIs exposed to developers/emitted by conversion rules wil...
- 01:08 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My primary concern with this is that it is costly to implement, even on the subsequent calls. Th... - 12:45 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- > * about the UnimplementedFeature: if we want to track only the fact that a portion of code which is not yet complet...
11/07/2014
- 02:02 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- About 1107a.zip; beside the following issues, I don't see any other problems in the logic.
* about the Unimplemented... - 12:21 PM Feature #27 (Review): implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- 12:10 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- This is the P2J update that contains the new compatible @ENCODE@ implementation in a fully integrated state. The com...
11/04/2014
- 03:02 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- Here are the other files.
- 03:01 PM Feature #27: implement a compatible ENCODE built-in function
- I have written a Java implementation based on the spec. I also have tested/fixed this implementation with over 750K ...
10/27/2014
- 02:17 PM Bug #2429: fix null character handling
- Our first pass at null character handling has been found to be incorrect. The original idea was that when one specif...
- 01:54 PM Bug #2429 (New): fix null character handling
Also available in: Atom