Greg Shah
- Registered on: 03/20/2012
- Last connection: 07/02/2024
Issues
- Assigned issues: 15
- Reported issues: 1096
Projects
- FWD (Manager, 04/12/2012)
- Harness (Manager, 04/12/2012)
- Documentation (Manager, 03/24/2014)
- Bugs (Manager, 04/12/2012)
- Core Development (Manager, 04/12/2012)
- Conversion Tools (Manager, 09/10/2012)
- Base Language (Manager, 09/10/2012)
- Database (Manager, 09/10/2012)
- User Interface (Manager, 09/10/2012)
- TRPL (Manager, 09/10/2012)
- Build and Source Control (Manager, 09/23/2012)
- Runtime Infrastructure (Manager, 10/23/2012)
Activity
Today
- 03:20 PM User Interface Bug #8917: Mouse focus management: focus update must happen on mouse down, not on mouse up
- What happens if you mouse down and then press the ESC key?
- 06:25 AM User Interface Bug #7657: 8-bit character entry problem in ChUI
- Reposted from #6431-50 by Robert Jensen:
> I'm not asure where to bring this up. I ran into some new issues with o...
07/01/2024
- 10:04 AM User Interface Bug #8809 (Test): Incorrect next enabled widget calculation
- 09:15 AM User Interface Bug #8809: Incorrect next enabled widget calculation
- You can merge to trunk now.
- 09:07 AM Base Language Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- OK, then lets avoid the temp-table implementation.
- 07:48 AM Base Language Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Constantin: Is this implicit temp-table access heavily used in the application code or is this something that can be ...
06/28/2024
- 01:23 PM User Interface Bug #8809: Incorrect next enabled widget calculation
- I'm more concerned with trying various scenarios to see if there is any breakage.
- 12:57 PM User Interface Bug #8809: Incorrect next enabled widget calculation
- Have you tested this with a customer's large GUI application?
- 10:40 AM Base Language Feature #4347 (Closed): add runtime support for STOP-AFTER block option
06/27/2024
- 01:05 PM User Interface Bug #8809: Incorrect next enabled widget calculation
- 6667g is based on a recent trunk. It can't be migrated back to 6667i because GSO 440 fails (some regression caused b...
Also available in: Atom