Activity
From 04/02/2020 to 05/01/2020
05/01/2020
- 02:14 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Just documenting some articles related to this:
* This article (https://knowledgebase.progress.com/articles/Article/... - 12:08 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- 4231b revision 11511 is the next pass at enum runtime and conversion, still unfinished. Registration has been modifie...
- 11:33 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- I've checked in the first pass at the base classes. They are unfinished.
I've moved the creation of the data stru... - 10:07 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> # What is the conversion support status of the items in #4384-1?
Greg, as far as I know everyt... - 10:05 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> OK, I have changed all enums in skeleton to use the standard OE definition, do you want that as ... - 09:53 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- OK, I have changed all enums in skeleton to use the standard OE definition, do you want that as an eclipse patch or how?
- 09:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg/Marian, have you changed the skeleton classes to use DEFINE ENUM instead of propert... - 09:08 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have not. I have only pulled the @LegacyEnum@ and @FlagsEnum@ from 4384b and reworked those before commit in 4231b...
- 06:16 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg/Marian, have you changed the skeleton classes to use DEFINE ENUM instead of property members, for the 4GL enums?
- 03:00 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: I am trying to get all the enums support from 4384b into 4231b. I hope to have this toni...
04/30/2020
- 04:15 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian: I am trying to get all the enums support from 4384b into 4231b. I hope to have this tonight, though there is...
- 11:01 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- I've forgot to add the LegacySignature to the GetEnum method.
I don t plan to continue with enum conversion for no... - 08:55 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > Constantin, do you think two maps are needed to handle say about 5-10 enum members that one might use? Those will b...
- 10:44 AM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- As noted above, the fact that the @MESSAGE SET@ output is not redirected in FWD is a known issue. We've never fixed ...
- 10:09 AM Feature #4395 (Test): add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
04/29/2020
- 06:09 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > One thing I wanted to mention about enums is those can be used in switch/case statements, also would be nice to mak...
- 05:57 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The two @byValue@ and @byName@ maps will always hold all the enum values.
Constantin,... - 05:38 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> From Marian:
>
> > One thing I wanted to mention about enums is those can be used in switch/ca... - 05:32 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- From Marian:
> One thing I wanted to mention about enums is those can be used in switch/case statements, also woul... - 04:47 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- I was just about to check in all the LegacyEnum, FlagsEnum, and the fixups of all the existing enum subclasses. It l...
- 04:04 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, the first pass at DEFINE ENUM conversion is in 4231b rev 11503. Please review.
The @oo/enums@ tests convert,... - 03:17 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Good, I like it.
> Does someone have the FWD equivalent for FlagsEnum ?
These are checked in to 4384b. I will ... - 03:12 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Does someone have the FWD equivalent for @FlagsEnum@ ?
- 03:06 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This means that @first in list@ and @createEnum with 2nd and 3rd argument a String@ would both lo... - 02:59 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Overall, I like the approach.
> The conversion rules will take care of linking these together, and the runtime wil... - 02:20 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- I just checked in new tests for @Clone()@ (it doesn't work) and @Progress.Lang.Enum:ToObject()@ (works like @GetEnum(...
- 02:18 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, my plan is for something like this:...
- 12:47 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, I've added stubs for @ObjectOps.newDynamicEnum@ and we also need a @ObjectOps.registerEnum(Class<? extends Lega...
- 12:11 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Fixed in rev 559. These were mostly cases where I had tested the code and then later changed the include file withou...
- 11:53 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, can you compile in 4GL all programs/classes in @oo/enums@? I have some weird errors:
* @oo.enums.Ordinals@ and... - 11:12 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Can we rename @p2j.oo.lang.Enum@ to @p2j.oo.lang.LegacyEnum@? To avoid java conflicts...
>
>... - 11:11 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I don't think we need indexed lookup, but we do need to do an orde... - 11:00 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > Can we rename @p2j.oo.lang.Enum@ to @p2j.oo.lang.LegacyEnum@? To avoid java conflicts...
Yes. - 10:48 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Can we rename @p2j.oo.lang.Enum@ to @p2j.oo.lang.LegacyEnum@? To avoid java conflicts...
- 10:20 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I don't think we need indexed lookup, but we do need to do an orde... - 10:17 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't think we need indexed lookup, but we do need to do an ordered (in the order of definition... - 10:14 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > Or toggleFlag, unsetFlag, setFlag and getEnum are all we need?
This should be the list, but the toggleFlag, uns... - 10:00 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> How do you define an enum to extend @FlagsEnum@ in 4GL?
By using the @flags@ option..... - 09:52 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Yes, I'll take the conversion. Do you have a comprehensive list ... - 09:47 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, I'll take the conversion. Do you have a comprehensive list of all the static metho... - 09:36 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: Let me know when you have your latest enum changes in 4384b. I'll pull them and use th... - 09:22 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: If you want to continue with the conversion, do let me know. I would then focus on t... - 09:12 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin: If you want to continue with the conversion, do let me know. I would then focus on the runtime parts.
... - 08:59 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > I've couldn't find a solution for using a Java enum though
Correct, we cannot use Java enums. The result must b... - 08:12 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I think right now the @Enum@ class holds references to all enum members (hash map on enum class)... - 08:06 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * I assume there will be a @BaseEnum@ super-class?
Why another @BaseEnum@ class, we alr... - 07:58 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, about the review:
* I assume there will be a @BaseEnum@ super-class?
* we need to override @toLegacyString@ a... - 07:55 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Good. So far, your feedback is completely consistent with my plan.
I've couldn't find a solutio... - 07:10 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Good. So far, your feedback is completely consistent with my plan.
Constantin: I still need your thoughts on the ... - 06:40 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The converted members need to be @object@ instances in FWD (with a ref to the actual enu... - 03:51 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I think if we use a private constructor and don't use @ObjectOps@ at all to create the enum memb... - 02:45 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> A quick note, the enum values should be emitted like this:
> [...]
>
> As an enum va... - 06:02 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have some issues with the @URI@ encode/decode, the 4GL implementation is not really matching the one available in U...
- 06:21 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Ah, forgot you are on windows. You need to add this node on the same level as @systemUser@, with the user's Windows p...
- 05:57 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the error is related to appserver agents. Do you have @Server ready@ message in the log? If yes, then non-web...
- 05:52 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> OK, moving skeleton files in project root and let the p2j.cfg.xml as is seems to solve it.
As... - 05:19 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- OK, moving skeleton files in project root and let the p2j.cfg.xml as is seems to solve it.
- 05:06 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin, the update you've made on @testcases@ repository for the appsrv/rest kinda ruined the environment, at lea...
- 05:31 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, anything related to retry should be ran from the command line and not the procedu... - 03:19 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Task is ready for test.
04/28/2020
- 07:15 PM Feature #4349 (WIP): add support for 4GL ENUM
- 07:15 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- The first set of runtime changes will be to get the parent classes (@Progress.Lang.Enum@ and @Progress.Lang.FlagsEnum...
- 06:47 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- 4231b rev 11498 contains conversion-related fixes for 4GL ENUM. This was done by chasing down INTERFACE_DEF, KW_INTE...
- 06:27 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- A quick note, the enum values should be emitted like this:...
- 09:45 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> See the @charRsp@ parameter - that's the inline definition.
Ah, I see... that is a plac... - 09:36 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > See @log_manager/common/dyn_objects.p@ and @profiler/procedur... - 09:36 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> See @log_manager/common/dyn_objects.p@ and @profiler/procedure_class/procedure.p@, thi... - 09:33 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Marian Edu wrote:
> What test does that exactly Constantin, inline variable definition isn't possible in 4gl... both... - 09:30 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've seen something interesting in a logmanager test:
> [...]
>
> You can inline the... - 08:47 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- OK. Please create a task to record the problem so we don't forget it.
- 08:37 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- I've seen something interesting in a logmanager test:...
- 08:49 AM Feature #4630: inline var definition for an OUTPUT parameter in an async RUN call
- 4GL allows inline of a var definition for at least this case:...
- 08:48 AM Feature #4630 (New): inline var definition for an OUTPUT parameter in an async RUN call
04/27/2020
- 05:16 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Roger, anything related to retry should be ran from the command line and not the procedure editor.
If you run it... - 04:20 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- > The error message already has a conflicting use. (99) is not being reported by FWD, which must be an unsupported er...
- 12:21 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- New testcase: @./uast/io/redirected_stream_close_on_retry.p@:...
- 11:36 AM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please cut this down to be something much smaller. I seriously doubt that more than 10% is neede... - 03:59 PM Feature #3812 (Test): additions to SESSION system-handle
- 12:22 PM Feature #3812: additions to SESSION system-handle
- The changes are in 4231b rev 11490.
- 01:47 PM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I've edited #3855-102 with more details about the work required.
... - 01:32 PM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've edited #3855-102 with more details about the work required.
Constantin, we're wo... - 01:00 PM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- I've edited #3855-102 with more details about the work required.
- 12:56 PM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- I've configured the testcases project to be able to run the appsrv and rest tests:
* the appserver is state-free. I... - 12:39 PM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- 4231b rev 11490 contains improvements related to TABLE, DATASET and more. A summary of what is left:
For REST:
*... - 12:24 PM Feature #3854: update appserver support with PASOE features
- Some improvements are in 4231b rev 11490.
What is left is not PASOE related, after running a appserver test suite:... - 10:02 AM Feature #4629: implement fully compatible 4GL collections (backed by protected temp-tables)
- A simple version of the 4GL collections was implemented instead of the temp-table backed alternative in #4384.
As ... - 09:55 AM Feature #4629 (New): implement fully compatible 4GL collections (backed by protected temp-tables)
- 08:48 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> For now, let's do the simple approach and map things to the Java collections.
>
> As usu... - 08:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I have a question about collections/maps, the implementation in 4GL is based on temp-tables but ... - 05:04 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have a question about collections/maps, the implementation in 4GL is based on temp-tables but I would say using exi...
- 01:48 AM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, a weird question: in case of argument validation errors for appserver calls, doe...
04/26/2020
- 12:30 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Marian, a weird question: in case of argument validation errors for appserver calls, does the caller's @block-level@ ...
- 08:31 AM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- RETRY is a very specific thing. Better to say that than to say re-execution, which has no 4GL meaning. The problem ...
04/24/2020
- 06:13 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Please cut this down to be something much smaller. I seriously doubt that more than 10% is needed. No prompting of ...
- 04:02 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- One of the behaviors of the 4GL and FWD when the error condition raised from i = integer("garbage"). is to jump execu...
- 03:57 PM Bug #4628 (New): redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- 01:49 PM Feature #3812: additions to SESSION system-handle
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Conversion + stubs or full support?
Full support, with some restrictions. I'll document them onc... - 01:48 PM Feature #3812: additions to SESSION system-handle
- Conversion + stubs or full support?
- 01:41 PM Feature #3812: additions to SESSION system-handle
- Following are added:
* @SESSION:CURRENT-REQUEST-INFO@ and @SESSION:CURRENT-RESPONSE-INFO@
* @server:REQUEST-INFO@ a... - 01:49 PM Feature #4381 (Test): implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- 01:48 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @private static@ methods should be after all @public static@ methods in a file.
Oops. Sorry. U... - 01:37 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- @private static@ methods should be after all @public static@ methods in a file.
- 01:24 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- ...
- 12:47 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Minor edits:...
- 12:38 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It is a useless feature. For now, I see no reason to add it. We could handle the file part, but... - 11:53 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- It is a useless feature. For now, I see no reason to add it. We could handle the file part, but even that has no me...
- 11:47 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- It does look like @SEARCH@ needs some work, because when you pass "filename.pl<<member.r>>" the 4GL is able to find t...
- 10:55 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 4. Have you confirmed the following?
>
> * Does it matter whether or not the procedure library... - 10:41 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Code Review Task Branch 4231b Reviison 11480
Overall, it is good.
1. In @FileSystemOps", move the new @private ... - 01:38 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> gets converted to
> [...]
Found it, probably serialization not needed yet but was a fun lear... - 01:12 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I didn't yet look into the @Web@ package and that is tight to the PASOE and web handlers mainly ... - 12:56 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: Other than the missing enum stuff which I am resolving, is there anything else blocking y... - 12:39 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian: Other than the missing enum stuff which I am resolving, is there anything else blocking you from delivering t...
- 07:31 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For variables/properties, the changes would be at the beginning of the @convert/variab... - 01:33 PM Feature #4392: add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This task is for the "server" handle-based resource (the appserver 4GL features, not database) an... - 01:21 PM Feature #4392: add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
- This task is for the "server" handle-based resource (the appserver 4GL features, not database) and the method @CONNEC...
- 01:07 PM Feature #4392: add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What is the status of this task?
This was done in the scope of #3813. - 11:43 AM Feature #4392: add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
- What is the status of this task?
- 01:06 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > maybe we can prevent those from being deleted and not show in session objects list somehow
Yes, as noted above t... - 01:02 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have a draft implementation for Enum and FlagsEnum that I've refactored so maybe the generato... - 12:37 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > I have a draft implementation for Enum and FlagsEnum that I've refactored so maybe the generator could start using ...
- 08:31 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- h2. 4GL Behavior/Functionality
* Enums are implicitly final subclasses of @Progress.Lang.Enum@ (regular enums) or ...
04/23/2020
- 02:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian: please try my previous suggestions and repost the patch.
Wouldn't be easier to ...
04/22/2020
- 11:39 AM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian, another question please: who/when sets the @SERVLET_SRVR_... - 11:23 AM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, another question please: who/when sets the @SERVLET_SRVR_DEBUG@ and @SERVLET_SER... - 10:42 AM Feature #3855: implement equivalent support for REST (classic appserver, PASOE REST and WEB trans...
- Marian, another question please: who/when sets the @SERVLET_SRVR_DEBUG@ and @SERVLET_SERVER_APP_MODE@ CGI vars? I ca...
- 10:50 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg: please fix the permissions, I can't even do a checkout from https://proj.goldencode.com/d... - 10:45 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > Greg: please fix the permissions, I can't even do a checkout from https://proj.goldencode.com/downloads/skeletons/r...
- 10:37 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > I would try @bzr diff -p1 -r <your checkout revision>@ so th... - 10:34 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, quick question - do you have the @toString@ method for @net.Uri@ class implement... - 10:32 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I would try @bzr diff -p1 -r <your checkout revision>@ so that on our side we can use... - 10:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, quick question - do you have the @toString@ method for @net.Uri@ class implemented? If not, I'm adding it in ...
- 10:16 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> That sounds like fun, now that I can debug the whole conversion process this might be interestin... - 10:15 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Should I try again a 'bzr send' for the skeleton or how should we send the changes there?
T... - 10:11 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > I see properties are converted to getter/setter methods and are a... - 10:06 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I see properties are converted to getter/setter methods and are annotated with the name as defin... - 09:56 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I see properties are converted to getter/setter methods and are annotated with the name as defined in 4GL, for variab...
- 06:15 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Hi Greg, we need @FlagsEnum@ for reflection so tried to implement something for this but there seems this is not yet ...
04/21/2020
- 06:05 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Being more explicit about returning unknown when the input is unknown is a good practice. The fa... - 05:48 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Added a simpler testcase @uast/library_calls/library_member2.p@
- 05:32 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Being more explicit about returning unknown when the input is unknown is a good practice. The fact that the matching...
- 05:22 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > You will need to add the proper error handling, but otherwise it is fi... - 05:18 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't see anything obviously wrong. The code seems like it should work.
>
> You will need t... - 05:04 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- I don't see anything obviously wrong. The code seems like it should work.
You will need to add the proper error h... - 04:39 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Made the changes to allow the pattern to be pre-compiled, but it no longer matches the given string....
- 02:53 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Code Review Task Branch 4231b Revision 11479
This is quite good. Here are some things to fix to make it better.
... - 02:19 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Ready for review......
- 02:14 PM Feature #4381 (WIP): implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- 12:43 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- That makes sense.
- 12:27 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Should these be placed nearby @SEARCH@ in @FileSystemOps@ like @searchLibrary@ and @searchMe... - 12:25 PM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Should these be placed nearby @SEARCH@ in @FileSystemOps@ like @searchLibrary@ and @searchMember@?
- 10:55 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Created @uast/library_member.p@ testcase based off some customer code. However, the use of @LIBRARY@ in the sample do...
- 10:41 AM Feature #4381: implement LIBRARY() and MEMBER() built-in functions
- Useful background information on libraries: https://documentation.progress.com/output/ua/OpenEdge_latest/index.html#p...
- 03:29 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task branch 4231b Revision 11470
>
> 1. In @KEEP-MESSAGES@ mode, have you checked ... - 10:07 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Don't change existing sample code in a way that destroys the original intent and control flow. Add a new testcase an...
- 09:16 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What is the testcase? Why is it retrying instead of exiting?
It is @uast/io/basic_redirecte... - 08:48 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- > It's difficult to determine how the 4GL is actually handling this. Perhaps it implicitly closes the stream, and we ...
- 05:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, I see that we are missing from @Progress.Lang.Class@ the methods which resolve a cla... - 05:37 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian, I'm mostly interested in @Progress.Lang.Class:new@ and @i... - 05:29 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, I'm mostly interested in @Progress.Lang.Class:new@ and @invoke@ calls when @Para... - 05:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, I'm mostly interested in @Progress.Lang.Class:new@ and @invoke@ calls when @ParameterList@ is involved (so ye...
- 04:59 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Quick question about @P.L.Class@ as that is listed in the short list there... do you need reflection support for that...
04/20/2020
- 04:53 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- I have updates to correct behavior where @Press space bar to continue@ was displayed in ChUI, even though output was ...
- 03:38 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Roger, PUT SCREEN issues in GUI are known, see #2372.
- 03:31 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- I am not seeing the testcases @put screen...@ show up in GUI like it does in 4GL. In @ThinClient@, the @putScreen@ me...
- 02:32 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- The latter seems most likely the same issue as #4619.
- 02:27 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Code Review (cont.)
2. In @LowLevelStream@ and @StreamDaemon@ you need to add an @id@ parameter javadoc entry for... - 02:23 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Code Review Task branch 4231b Revision 11470
1. In @KEEP-MESSAGES@ mode, have you checked the following behavior?
... - 02:01 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- > An unrelated issues has to do with how display "Last Line" with frame f-last. is handled, with message "A message."...
- 01:45 PM Feature #4395 (WIP): add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- 01:45 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Ready for review....
- 11:40 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- In the spirit of "learning to fish", you could use the following to answer the question yourself:
@my-int-var = in... - 11:16 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Now we are cooking... @keepMessages@ is now available to the client in the critical location.
At looking at the s... - 09:30 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- > I do know my breakpoint in StreamDaemon.setKeepMessages(int id) doesn't get hit.
This breakpoint will be hit in ... - 09:27 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> See @ThinClient.getCurrentRedirection()@.
On the server side, @RemoteStream.setKeepMessages@ i... - 07:22 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- See @ThinClient.getCurrentRedirection()@.
- 01:02 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Do I still need to fiddle with RemoteStream if I am converting as:
>
> Yes. @RemoteStream@ ...
04/19/2020
- 05:45 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- > Do I still need to fiddle with RemoteStream if I am converting as:
Yes. @RemoteStream@ is how it gets to the cl... - 05:14 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @getKeepMessages()@ should be named @isKeepMessages()@ since the flag is a @boolean@. The standa... - 10:35 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- @getKeepMessages()@ should be named @isKeepMessages()@ since the flag is a @boolean@. The standard for Java "bean" n...
- 10:16 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- It looks like there is a bug in @LogicalTerminal.message()@ whereby the output stream is never checked for redirectio...
- 09:58 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- That part is straightforward. I am using @setKeepMessages()@ without a parameter because it is an option that default...
04/18/2020
- 06:40 AM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- > I would just call the setter directly as setKeepMessages(true), instead of modifying the StreamFactory APIs.
Agr...
04/17/2020
- 06:49 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Greg/Roger: the IO options can be emitted as a setter; see this portion of @convert/input_output.rules@:...
- 06:39 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Please look at @StreamFactory@. You will see that it is stateless in regard to new streams. The @KEEP-MESSAGES@ fla...
- 05:18 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- The @input_output.rules@ do not do anything with the @KEEP-MESSAGES@ options. There is the possibility of adding an a...
- 03:49 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- Updated testcase @uast/binary/read-text-and-binary.p@ to show there is no differences in having @keep-messages@ on th...
- 02:27 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- ...
- 12:33 PM Feature #4395: add support for KEEP-MESSAGES option
- ...
04/16/2020
- 03:58 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > Marian, just do a bzr revert and bzr clean-tree - to cleanup ... - 03:35 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, just do a bzr revert and bzr clean-tree - to cleanup after the update.
OK, ... - 03:17 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Branch 4384b was created from 4231b revision 11458. Access it using @bzr ... - 03:02 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Branch 4384b was created from 4231b revision 11458. Access it using @bzr co sftp://<userid>@xfer... - 08:16 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- 4384a was archived as dead on devsrv01. Please note that I was unable to @bzr push --overwrite@ on devsrv01 so I zip...
- 08:14 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Branch 4384b was created from 4231b revision 11458. Access it using @bzr co sftp://<userid>@xfer.goldencode.com/opt/...
04/15/2020
- 06:44 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > I think we should preserve 4384a as a dead branch on devsrv01 and create 4384b.
Will do. - 06:38 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> # rebase 4231b from trunk 11346
The rebase of 4231b is done.
> # replace the 4384a branch with ... - 05:57 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > Greg: can you please update the web repo?
Done. - 05:40 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think the faster way is to:
>
> # merge the exact revisions from 4384a into 4231b
The 11426... - 05:36 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > Yes, please zip it and upload it to xfer.
> I'm confused as ... - 04:25 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I think the faster way is to:
# merge the exact revisions from 4384a into 4231b
# rebase 4231b from trunk 11346
... - 02:06 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, did you do a bzr merge or bzr rebase for 4384a, with 4231b?
>
> I'm trying to... - 01:40 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, did you do a bzr merge or bzr rebase for 4384a, with 4231b?
I'm trying to rebase 4384a from 4231b, and I t... - 12:47 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, please zip it and upload it to xfer.
I'm confused as of what you refer to when y... - 12:32 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian Edu wrote:
> > > Did pulled the skeleton fresh and sync t... - 12:31 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Did pulled the skeleton fresh and sync the two folders, attached ... - 12:03 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Did pulled the skeleton fresh and sync the two folders, attached the patch.
Where did you pull ... - 11:21 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, do let me know when they are there. I need to do a review and see if they can be me... - 10:48 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Will try to push the changes to 4384a now
OK, do let me know when they are there. I need to do... - 10:45 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, are all your 4384a changes pushed to xfer?
>
> Also, please upload to xfer th... - 10:22 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, are all your 4384a changes pushed to xfer?
Also, please upload to xfer the full skeleton project, with you...
04/14/2020
- 10:03 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Not sure how the skeleton works for you, looks like it's being used by the parser to resolve ... - 09:57 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Great!
- 09:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Thanks for posting a high level status.
>
> It is very high priority to get the conversion par... - 09:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > One thing: I didn't anticipate your need to greatly change the skeletons. Can you help us under... - 09:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Thanks for posting a high level status.
It is very high priority to get the conversion parts finished ASAP. Can y... - 09:35 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> One thing: I didn't anticipate your need to greatly change the skeletons. Can you help us unde... - 09:34 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > One thing: I didn't anticipate your need to greatly change the skeletons. Can you help us understand the need for t...
- 09:32 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > > Not sure how the skeleton works for you, looks like it's being used by the parser to resolve references,
Yes,... - 02:17 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> h2. OO Built-Ins Requiring Implementation
>
> Breakdown of OO BuiltIns to focus on:
> * ...
04/13/2020
- 10:22 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> As a temporary patch, you can move this section:
> [...]
> from @rules/fixups/post_par... - 08:27 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > If you want to fix this now, just move the @_1@ suffix fr... - 08:14 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> If you want to fix this now, just move the @_1@ suffix from the property getter to the J... - 08:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, this is fixed in 3471a which will be in trunk soon.
If you want to fix this now, just move the @_1@ suffix... - 07:43 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > And the skeleton have a public property and protected methods lik... - 07:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> And the skeleton have a public property and protected methods like this:
> [...]
Hmm... are th... - 07:33 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- And the skeleton have a public property and protected methods like this:...
- 07:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > The test is oo/openedge/net/message_part/test_property_headers.p
... - 07:28 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> The test is oo/openedge/net/message_part/test_property_headers.p
Marian, I'm looking into it. - 07:14 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- OK, I give-up :(
I'm trying to make sense of why the conversion is using the wrong method name here but I really d...
04/11/2020
- 12:38 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've tried to merge your changes to skeleton with ours and no wonder there are merge conflicts, I can solve those now...
04/09/2020
- 06:56 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> @Greg, do you have already a blue print for the OE Enums? We still have some issues with those a... - 02:54 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- @Greg, do you have already a blue print for the OE Enums? We still have some issues with those and would be nice to k...
04/07/2020
- 01:51 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> FYI, I have updated @https://proj.goldencode.com/downloads/skeletons/repo@ to rev 89 earlier toda... - 01:43 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > Sounds simple enough, how do we know when we need to incorporate changes from 4231b, will someone notify us or we s...
- 01:39 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > I think is related to using a skeleton c... - 12:58 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- The fix is in 4231b rev 11427 on xfer. I should have added it to 4384a, sorry.
You can try the rebase now :) - 12:53 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > I think is related to using a skeleton class. For example, at lea... - 12:42 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I think is related to using a skeleton class. For example, at least the skeleton methods... - 12:40 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I think is related to using a skeleton class. For example, at least the skeleton methods are missing the @extent@ for...
- 12:39 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian Edu wrote:
> > > @Constantin, the code generated still do... - 12:26 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > @Constantin, the code generated still doesn't work for us when in... - 12:16 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In fact, you can always rebase an unbound 4384a branch from the latest 4231b on xfer and then @... - 12:15 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> @Constantin, the code generated still doesn't work for us when indeterminate extents are used. T... - 12:08 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > OK, we will continue to work with our local git repository and only I will push changes to bazaar to keep it simple...
- 11:49 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > There was no cast in the conversion rule and we didn't changed th... - 11:18 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Created branch 4384a, branched from 4231b revision 11425.
>
> Access it:
>
> @bzr co sftp:/... - 12:11 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Another case to cover: simple statements with @NO-ERROR@, like @ch = h:name NO-ERROR.@ and @input from os-dir("missin...
04/06/2020
- 03:31 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Created branch 4384a, branched from 4231b revision 11425.
Access it:
@bzr co sftp://<userid>@xfer.goldencode.co...
04/03/2020
- 09:54 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> There was no cast in the conversion rule and we didn't changed the rules simply modified the gen... - 09:49 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, there's a FWD conversion bug for this extent assign case. I'll fix it.
>
> W... - 09:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, there's a FWD conversion bug for this extent assign case. I'll fix it.
What's the signature for @assignMu... - 09:25 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> fixes the reference but the uncheck cast is ugly to say at least :(
Changing the @assignMulti... - 09:15 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, what's the use case for the extent problem? Can you modify it so that it uses a ...
Also available in: Atom