Activity
From 05/01/2020 to 05/30/2020
05/29/2020
- 09:50 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've updated the standard.df on xfer testcases with the latest one from the Hotel GUI project.
- 07:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- The correct line is:...
- 07:19 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > This is a NPE if not configured properly :(
> The pkgroot and ou... - 07:15 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is a NPE if not configured properly :(
The pkgroot and output-root must always be there, s... - 07:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Argh, you are on windows, right? Please try this patch:...
- 07:10 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > What's the stacktrace?
> [...]
> > I tried a simple conver... - 07:09 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is on 4384c, aren't we supposed to use that one from now on?
It works with 4384c rev 11568... - 06:54 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What's the stacktrace? ... - 06:51 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> OK, moved to the new branch and merged our local changes but now we can't get the conversion to ... - 06:24 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Understood. If there is no choice here, then keep going on this path. The code is actively us... - 06:10 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg: please create 4384c.
>
> This is now available in @xfer.goldencode.com:/opt/fwd/4384c@... - 08:31 AM Feature #4354: add GET-CLASS() function support
- I'm not sure if all error handling is complete, but the basic functionality for @GET-CLASS()@ is present in branch 42...
- 08:28 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Implementation of the built-in OO class @Progress.Util.EnumHelper@ is not needed because it is only used for .NET enu...
- 08:25 AM Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- OO classes and enums support serialization in the 4GL.
This includes:
* @SERIALIZABLE@/@NON-SERIALIZABLE@/@SERI... - 07:34 AM Feature #4658 (WIP): OO serialization support
05/28/2020
- 03:11 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Second pass for SOAP support is in 4231b rev 11569
* The SOAP input are the .wsm files, not .xpxg (as these contain ... - 11:50 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is that correct? Also, do you have a list of the things left to do (or to test or to... - 10:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > Greg: please create 4384c.
This is now available in @xfer.goldencode.com:/opt/fwd/4384c@ and was branched from 4... - 09:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > We were working more on the HTTP package, the question was more whether or not to work on the web handler or Consta...
- 09:09 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I need to do small commit into @4231b@. Is it safe now? Or the branch is now frozen for mer... - 09:06 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've merged 4384b from 4231b rev 11566 - new rev 11609.
>
> 4384b rev 11609 was merge... - 09:03 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've merged 4384b from 4231b rev 11566 - new rev 11609.
4384b rev 11609 was merged to 4231b rev 11567.
Greg: pl... - 08:51 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It is OK to finish the web handler work first, if that is what you are asking.
>
We were workin... - 08:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- It is OK to finish the web handler work first, if that is what you are asking.
> As it is now everything that was ... - 06:23 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg, we keep jumping from one dependency to another here so the list of classes that needs to be implemented keep on...
- 05:46 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian, I need to rebase and merge the 4384b changes to 4231b. P... - 05:45 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, I need to rebase and merge the 4384b changes to 4231b. Please commit all change... - 05:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, I need to rebase and merge the 4384b changes to 4231b. Please commit all changes you have (and you consider ...
- 09:08 AM Support #4657: memory overhead from preloading classes with LegacySignature
- Theoretically, all converted classes will be loaded at some point, considering the application usage and a very-long-...
- 08:55 AM Support #4657: memory overhead from preloading classes with LegacySignature
- When the server starts, the @SourceNameMapper.initMappingData()@ will walk the name map and load all of the converted...
- 08:43 AM Support #4657 (WIP): memory overhead from preloading classes with LegacySignature
05/27/2020
- 05:40 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > Is the #4349-69 list of files meant to be 'dead' in 4384b, and their current 4231b version survive?
Yes, exactly... - 04:00 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Please merge the 4384b changes into 4231b, avoiding the list of files from #4349-69. ... - 03:31 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Marian: Is 4384b missing any changes from your team?
Constantin: Please merge the 4384b changes into 4231b, avoidi... - 01:20 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: from there, your team should be able to move ahead with enums pretty easily. My only c... - 12:56 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- 4231b revision 11564 is the first full implementation of enum support. Conversion is working well and has been teste...
- 02:35 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, to check the above, please use a @pipe_two_ints.p@ program like this:...
- 10:19 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> As far as we've observed from the tests the only exception to strict validation was in the case ... - 09:13 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And one more note: the @rowid@ in FWD is an integer; in OE is a 'byte array' (same as me... - 09:06 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, your previous note is bugging me... assuming that:
> * you have 4 input argumen... - 08:22 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- And one more note: the @rowid@ in FWD is an integer; in OE is a 'byte array' (same as memptr/raw); we will not be abl...
- 08:16 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Also, please upload the log for @SubAppObject_TestSuite@.
- 08:14 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, your previous note is bugging me... assuming that:
* you have 4 input arguments with the same type (int)
* ...
05/26/2020
- 06:29 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, yes, for extent arguments FWD has some special ways of passing them as arguments. For dynamic extent, is eve...
- 04:05 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- There is something unclear about how to call a ctor that has an array (indeterminate extent) input parameter - like J...
- 05:46 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, do you have tests to use as input extent vars or tables with extent fields? @pi...
05/25/2020
- 10:16 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- BTW, I think we also missed the 'pipe extent' for vars or table fields for REST... please add these, too (input and o...
- 09:06 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, do you have tests to use as input extent vars or tables with extent fields? @pipe_ext.p@ and @table_extent.p...
- 02:59 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- There is an issue with using an @Enum@'s @GetEnum@ method passed as input parameter to another method. That fails dur...
05/22/2020
- 04:36 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Do I need to add the @@LegacySignature@ annotation to the converted enum members?
As I unders... - 04:17 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin, some questions:
1. Do I need to add the @@LegacySignature@ annotation to the converted enum members?
... - 03:25 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Something I forgot to note. As part of this task, I've added @LegacySignature@ annotations to external programs (and...
- 01:24 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> In FWD, I want to know what to do if I access the @https://localhost:7443/ws/notaservi... - 11:57 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > * what happens if the WSDL is not found, when trying to access it... - 11:52 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * what happens if the WSDL is not found, when trying to access it via the URL?
what do ... - 08:55 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is this entry in @fwd.xpxg@:
> [...]
> but is missing in @fwd.wsm@ and @fwd.wsdl... - 08:51 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, please help with these, too:
* what happens if the WSDL is not found, when trying to access it via the URL?
... - 08:35 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Thanks, Marian.
> >
> > I'm missing a @pipe_char_ext.p@ file
... - 08:23 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Thanks, Marian.
>
> I'm missing a @pipe_char_ext.p@ file
I think the file name is @p... - 08:13 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Thanks, Marian.
I'm missing a @pipe_char_ext.p@ file, and in the revision I don't see any changes in the @pipe_@ t... - 08:04 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- OK, finally got everything setup again and updated the tests/add new ones as well as the SoapUI project/test cases. Y...
05/21/2020
- 01:14 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Thanks, I've committed 4384b rev 11564 to 4231b rev 11552.
>
>... - 09:51 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Thanks, I've committed 4384b rev 11564 to 4231b rev 11552.
Constantin, I've missed th... - 09:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Thanks, I've committed 4384b rev 11564 to 4231b rev 11552.
- 09:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, please add full stubs for the @ClientLibraryBuilder@ class. Currently I need es... - 08:51 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, please add full stubs for the @ClientLibraryBuilder@ class. Currently I need especially the @ServerNameIndic...
- 06:50 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Changes committed in revision 11563, if you see any issues please... - 06:27 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Changes committed in revision 11563, if you see any issues please let me know.
I don't understa... - 06:24 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've committed the StatusCodeEnum and InternalEntry changes from 4384b to 4231b rev 11551, as these were required by ...
- 03:04 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Just to avoid registering all tree will probably just add an over... - 06:23 AM Feature #3310 (WIP): add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and Pro...
- The conversion and runtime support is in 4231b rev 11551
What remains are some edge-cases (related to fault, legac...
05/20/2020
- 11:02 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Attached the patch, let me know if that works or not.
It worked, the changes are in rev 94.
... - 10:50 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Just to avoid registering all tree will probably just add an override to say which type name we'... - 08:57 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I think the issue is that we need to register all the super-classes and super-interfac... - 08:10 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > I have a set of changes to skeleton project, how should I make a ... - 05:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I have a set of changes to skeleton project, how should I make a pull request here? :)
Try @bzr... - 05:10 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> When that is being used, at some point in @ControlFlow.resolveLegacyEntry@ there is a check if t... - 04:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have a set of changes to skeleton project, how should I make a pull request here? :)
I seems to have an issue wi...
05/15/2020
- 04:02 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Look for 'raise_error', 'raise_quit', 'raise_stop', 'return_value', 'return_error'...
I see the... - 03:14 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > There are procedures for all those cases, in SoapUI project I can... - 03:11 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Now, the issue we have is because we have a subscription plan our licenses for 11.7 expired and ... - 03:02 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> There are procedures for all those cases, in SoapUI project I can see those but not in any of th... - 02:48 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, I need also tests about these:
> * raised errors (QUIT, STOP, ERROR, etc)
Ther... - 02:17 AM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, do you know if you can use table with extent fields (or extent arguments) for SOAP r...
05/14/2020
- 06:24 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, I need also tests about these:
* raised errors (QUIT, STOP, ERROR, etc)
* some tests for the before-table -...
05/13/2020
- 02:48 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- OK, do you know if you can use table with extent fields (or extent arguments) for SOAP requests?
- 01:13 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, can you please run the full 'primitives' suite in SoapUI and commit the log? The... - 01:11 PM Feature #3310: add support for the equivalent of the OpenEdge Web Services Adapter (and ProxyGen)...
- Marian, can you please run the full 'primitives' suite in SoapUI and commit the log? The current log has only a small...
- 01:10 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My current changes in @LegacyClass@:
My change here is on @getLegacyClass@ to call on ObjectOp... - 12:02 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- My current changes in @LegacyClass@:...
- 10:47 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Regarding previous use of @registerClass@, it turns out a legacy class must be registered before... - 10:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I meant @pendingInitialized.pop()@, which needs to be done in @scopeFinished()@, as @s... - 10:12 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Marian Edu wrote:
> > > OK, did that, pushed changes (rev 11557)... - 10:10 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > OK, did that, pushed changes (rev 11557), seems to work now thank... - 09:22 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> OK, did that, pushed changes (rev 11557), seems to work now thanks.
You forgot a @pop@ for @pen... - 07:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I think @ObjectOps.newInstanceInternal@ (the private one) needs to keep a registry of 'p... - 05:36 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> I can try to get around this by directly using @setOption@ instead as that one returns logical s... - 05:24 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, a few issues:
> * I don't understand all the @ObjectOps.registerClass@ calls - ...
05/12/2020
- 06:30 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I want to avoid using @undoThrow()@ everywhere in our runtime. This was designed to be used from... - 06:01 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- I want to avoid using @undoThrow()@ everywhere in our runtime. This was designed to be used from within a @BlockMana...
- 05:48 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. If I understand correctly, any direct usage of @new ErrorConditionException(...)@ will not wor... - 01:10 PM Bug #4602: fixes for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- I'm reproducing some discussion from #4349.
#4349-55:
>> Greg Shah wrote:
>>
>> Consider this code:
>>
>> ... - 05:22 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, a few issues:
* I don't understand all the @ObjectOps.registerClass@ calls - what was the reason you added t... - 02:25 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > This is giving false twice, the object is not valid but no error ... - 01:43 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is giving false twice, the object is not valid but no error message. Debugging it I can see... - 01:35 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I'm going nuts over here, not the first time I have fun trying to figure out why an object can't be instantiated - so...
- 01:40 PM Bug #4355: exception member of the CATCH block can be referenced after the block catching it
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Can you link us to the discussion of your fix (and the revision of 4231b in which the... - 01:18 PM Bug #4355 (Test): exception member of the CATCH block can be referenced after the block catching it
- This is fixed in 4231b.
Constantin: Can you link us to the discussion of your fix (and the revision of 4231b in wh...
05/08/2020
- 05:42 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Named events are used in some of the HTTP classes, I see there is conversion support for events.... - 05:27 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Named events are used in some of the HTTP classes, I see there is conversion support for events. On subscribe/unsubsc...
05/07/2020
- 10:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> True, how about I rename it to @hasInstanceCtor@?
Yes, even better. - 10:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The change is functionally correct, but the @hasDefCtor@ var name no longer means what... - 10:37 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Look in @annotations/method_defs.rules@, the @check_ctors@ function and @hasDefCtor@ fla... - 10:32 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > We need an int... but please add... - 10:20 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You mean the @_constructor__@ method in FWD, right? I think you are correct here, we s... - 07:35 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Question about conversion of OO classes, in 4GL if there is any constructor defined the default ... - 07:31 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> To be clear, I'm thinking about the built-in classes here. For example, we could provide alterna... - 07:17 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- To be clear, I'm thinking about the built-in classes here. For example, we could provide alternate versions of @lega...
- 07:14 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > > Constantin: Right now we don't have any mechanism to overload @@LegacyParameter@ signatures using Java literal ty...
- 06:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Question about conversion of OO classes, in 4GL if there is any constructor defined the default no-parameters one is ...
- 08:23 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > I'm planning to emit specific versions of these in each flags enum subclass. They will call the worker at the paren...
- 07:24 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- > > > Calling the one in super is fine. The problem is the return type - if the return type is the actual enum type,...
- 05:23 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Calling the one in super is fine. The problem is the ret...
05/06/2020
- 05:54 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Right now we don't have any mechanism to overload @@LegacyParameter@ signatures using... - 05:05 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin: Right now we don't have any mechanism to overload @@LegacyParameter@ signatures using Java literal types ...
- 11:15 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Constantin, I see the getter methods are not used anymore but pub... - 11:08 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the fix for #4384-266 is in 4384b rev 11545. This fixes the @test_char_longchar.p@ test. Please check your ...
- 07:02 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin, I see the getter methods are not used anymore but public properties with no @LegacyS... - 05:19 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Look at @UriEncodingTypeEnum@ and change all others to match this pattern.
>
Consta... - 03:52 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > We need an int... but please add some constants for these... - 03:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> We need an int... but please add some constants for these values, and not emit just @1@ ... - 03:36 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Also, please make some changes, so that @LegacySignature.serializ... - 03:03 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Also, please make some changes, so that @LegacySignature.serializable@ is a boolean flag... - 03:05 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Calling the one in super is fine. The problem is the return type - if the return type i... - 02:32 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > For @FlagsEnum.cls@ - see @ClassDefinition.registerEnumMethods@.
... - 05:14 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For @FlagsEnum.cls@ - see @ClassDefinition.registerEnumMethods@.
>
> Here, we need to...
05/05/2020
- 06:33 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Did pushed some testcase right now - oo\longchar\test_char_longchar.p. You will see the two can'... - 04:51 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin, this seems to work but you should better take a look at it before... attached the pa... - 01:40 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > FlagsEnum
>
> I'm editing this, is there anything for Marian to do?
Hmm... I don't think so... - 01:17 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > This includes LegacyEnum, FlagsEnum, and anything else runtime-specific for enums. (Greg, please correct me if I'm ...
- 12:28 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've rebased 4384b rev 11477 from 4231b rev 11524, new 4384b rev is 11544.
Marian, sorry but for some FWD code I t... - 08:41 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, push everything you have at this time. I want to review first, and if we can't m... - 08:32 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Yes it should be there already, I have some additional changes that I can push if you want to do... - 08:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, is the @variable-sig.patch@ in 4384b? I want to start checking these and at leas... - 08:27 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, is the @variable-sig.patch@ in 4384b? I want to start checking these and at least rebase 4384b with latest 42...
- 05:54 PM Feature #4635: bundle CREATE folowed by ASSIGN in a single statement
- In terms of generated bytecode, the @tt1.createAndAssign("f1", "f2", "f3", 1, 2, 3);@ call actually takes ~2.5 more b...
- 04:20 PM Feature #4635: bundle CREATE folowed by ASSIGN in a single statement
- There are some cases where this pattern of a CREATE followed by an ASSIGN using only that temp-table's fields is used...
- 04:14 PM Feature #4635 (New): bundle CREATE folowed by ASSIGN in a single statement
- 01:40 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- For @FlagsEnum.cls@ - see @ClassDefinition.registerEnumMethods@.
Here, we need to add the proper signatures for al... - 07:42 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- For the infinite recursion - the issue was that @WidgetPool@ was calling @TM.getTransactionHelper()@ and @PM.getProce...
- 07:29 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg, regarding the static c'tor problem: I think the @LegacyEnum.createEnumWorker@ should return @null@ if @Configur...
- 05:05 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> Please note that the code above will result in tracked objects (e.g. in the session object ch... - 02:27 AM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Consider this code:
>
> [...]
>
> @LegacyErrorException@ extends @ErrorConditionException@ ...
05/04/2020
- 05:45 PM Feature #3869: enhance JasperReports support with sub-reports and ProDataSets
- The following are some answers by Stanislav to some questions related to Jasper and multiple queries.
> Is it poss... - 03:45 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- Consider this code:...
- 11:55 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, I'm working on stabilizing 4231b conversion, and after that I'll work on integra... - 09:19 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, I'm working on stabilizing 4231b conversion, and after that I'll work on integrating/testing your changes. I...
- 07:38 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Ah, one question I've meant to ask before... in 4GL the compiler is less strict when it comes of longchar/character d...
- 07:31 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I've pushed the latest skeletons rev 93 to @https://proj.goldencode.com/downloads/skeletons/repo/... - 07:14 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've pushed the latest skeletons rev 93 to @https://proj.goldencode.com/downloads/skeletons/repo/@.
- 04:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've applied the skeleton patch and some additional to rev 93
This is a revision of w... - 02:14 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I've applied the skeleton patch and some additional to rev 93
So, what shall we do? T...
05/03/2020
- 02:43 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've applied the skeleton patch and some additional to rev 93
05/01/2020
- 02:14 PM Bug #4628: redirection doesn't seem to close an output stream on a block retry
- Just documenting some articles related to this:
* This article (https://knowledgebase.progress.com/articles/Article/... - 12:08 PM Feature #4349: add support for 4GL ENUM
- 4231b revision 11511 is the next pass at enum runtime and conversion, still unfinished. Registration has been modifie...
- 10:07 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> # What is the conversion support status of the items in #4384-1?
Greg, as far as I know everyt... - 10:05 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> OK, I have changed all enums in skeleton to use the standard OE definition, do you want that as ... - 09:53 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- OK, I have changed all enums in skeleton to use the standard OE definition, do you want that as an eclipse patch or how?
- 09:13 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg/Marian, have you changed the skeleton classes to use DEFINE ENUM instead of propert... - 09:08 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have not. I have only pulled the @LegacyEnum@ and @FlagsEnum@ from 4384b and reworked those before commit in 4231b...
- 06:16 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg/Marian, have you changed the skeleton classes to use DEFINE ENUM instead of property members, for the 4GL enums?
- 03:00 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: I am trying to get all the enums support from 4384b into 4231b. I hope to have this toni...
Also available in: Atom