Activity
From 09/25/2020 to 10/24/2020
10/23/2020
- 10:50 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- I'm going to copy in the testcase code so what we are discussing is clear to future readers.
@Base.cls@:... - 10:23 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- I don't recall why we needed to distinguish between internal and non-static method lookup. Hierarchy lookup is perfo...
- 10:16 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- I don't think this is correct. With this change, @internal@ will always be @true@.
- 09:41 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Marian, this patch solves the issue.
Greg: if this looks OK, I'll commit to 3821c.... - 09:51 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> There the method is qualified so it's not a problem, the problem is that @_BaseObject_@ (input) ...
10/22/2020
- 08:34 AM Bug #4977 (Closed): Temp Table with P.L.O field
- 07:41 AM Bug #4977: Temp Table with P.L.O field
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Fixed in 3821c rev 11731
>
> Marian, you can use this patch with your WIP branch:
> ... - 07:31 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- From Marian:
> The 4GL seems to allow calling a static method defined in the base class as if it is part of the cl... - 06:14 AM Bug #4978 (Review): Static method call in base class
- 06:46 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Friday is fine.
- 02:24 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> When is a good time to merge 4384g back into 3821c?
Working on @Class@ for @invoke@ and @Param... - 06:46 AM Support #4951 (Closed): Longchar input parameter
- > Understood, the only thing that bothered me there was the boxing to longchar when we had to call a method with a ch...
- 02:09 AM Support #4951: Longchar input parameter
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Question, is there a 'rule' for this as in do we must leave it longchar, can we use Te... - 02:06 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Do you have an example for this?
The only one we stumble upon is for @MapEntry@ that...
10/21/2020
- 11:56 AM Bug #4971 (Closed): Object array resize
- 10:02 AM Bug #4971: Object array resize
- The fix in 4384g rev 11706 looks OK - when resizing to zero, the type is extracted from the array's first element and...
- 10:11 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- When is a good time to merge 4384g back into 3821c?
- 10:07 AM Support #4951: Longchar input parameter
- > Question, is there a 'rule' for this as in do we must leave it longchar, can we use Text instead or this is actuall...
- 09:48 AM Support #4951: Longchar input parameter
- From Marian:
> Since 4GL allows passing a character (variable or string) for a longchar input parameter I thought ... - 09:49 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > > When a class is instantiated a 'constructor' method that matches the arguments is searched and then depending on ...
- 09:21 AM Bug #4977 (WIP): Temp Table with P.L.O field
- Fixed in 3821c rev 11731
Marian, you can use this patch with your WIP branch:... - 07:07 AM Bug #4977: Temp Table with P.L.O field
- From Marian:
> There are some issues when trying to pass a temp-table as parameter if it contains at least one P.L... - 03:15 AM Bug #4977 (Closed): Temp Table with P.L.O field
10/19/2020
- 08:49 AM Bug #4971: Object array resize
- From Marian:
> When an non-fixed extent variable of type @object@ is resized the actual object type previously sav... - 08:40 AM Bug #4971 (Closed): Object array resize
10/15/2020
- 06:22 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- From Marian:
> When a class is instantiated a 'constructor' method that matches the arguments is searched and then... - 02:18 AM Feature #4965 (Test): Parameter annotation - qualified
10/13/2020
- 10:43 AM Feature #4761: I18N phase 3
- From Marian in regard to the work on #4384:
> Some of those are still on hold mostly because of codepage convert i...
10/12/2020
- 03:48 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> This should solve your issue.
Thanks for that, works like a charm :)
- 03:34 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, OK, I understand the issue. i think you can solve it yourself:
* look at @SymbolResolver.findConvertedLegac... - 02:09 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian Edu wrote:
> > Is there a way to have those classes from the OO implementation r...
10/09/2020
- 11:59 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Is there a way to have those classes from the OO implementation registered so when we try to dyn... - 11:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've merged all changes from 4384f into 3821c revision 11696. Consider 4384f dead. I have created a new branch 4384...
- 03:28 AM Support #4951 (Closed): Longchar input parameter
10/05/2020
- 02:22 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Question is, do we need to implement those new 'core' classes or we just leave it using a list ... - 11:39 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > Question is, do we need to implement those new 'core' classes or we just leave it using a list of bytes array as it...
- 07:19 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I'm working on updating Core.ByteBucket to 12.2 and it looks like they are using now a Progress.IO.MemoryOutputStream...
10/01/2020
- 06:47 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Is there a way to have those classes from the OO implementation registered so when we try to dynamically load one of ...
Also available in: Atom