Activity
From 02/26/2022 to 03/27/2022
03/25/2022
- 01:13 PM Bug #5294 (Closed): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 13690
No objections. - 12:51 PM Bug #5294 (Review): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- 12:51 PM Bug #5294 (WIP): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Thanks, the patch is in 3821c/13690.
- 12:36 PM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- There is no way to comment out the rule definition itself. You can use @/* */@ or @//@ comments inside a rule to rem...
- 10:47 AM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Greg, how do I comment the rule in antlr? I can't neither with @/**/@ or with @//@.
These rules need to be commen...
03/22/2022
- 02:58 PM Bug #5288: Some date field character comparisons have runtime incompatibilities during runtime
- The attached patch is a partial fix, which hasn't been checked in. I wanted to make sure it is kept with this task.
03/11/2022
- 12:50 PM Feature #6161 (Closed): add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY...
03/09/2022
- 04:20 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the root cause is that there is a @catch (Exception)@ in some p2j.oo code. This...
03/08/2022
- 08:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the root cause is that there is a @catch (Exception)@ in some p2j.oo code. This will catch a ConditionExcept...
- 06:33 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please point me to a test which shows this.
oo/json/array/get_date.p
making @Leg... - 06:23 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Marian: Please document the final status of this task in the format of #43... - 06:22 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: Please document the final status of this task in the format of #4384-462.
I'm having i...
03/07/2022
- 02:28 PM Feature #4384 (Closed): Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian: Please document the final status of this task in the format of #4384-462.
- 12:08 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- The final changes for 4384m are in 3821c/13617 and the skeleton patch is in rev 103
All projects must be reconvert... - 03:07 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've committed the patch with the changes in #4384-598 to 3821c/13613.
Next I'll test the skeleton patch without t... - 02:26 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Some changes in ExpressionConversionWorker and ClassDefinition, which were explicitly ma...
03/06/2022
- 08:08 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Some changes in ExpressionConversionWorker and ClassDefinition, which were explicitly marking 'invoke' methods as POL...
- 03:47 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- There are some regressions in the patch:
* @invoke@ is emitted instead of @invokeStandalone@ - this is required as O...
Also available in: Atom