FWD » Core Development » Base Language

04/07/2022

08:45 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > > The question. If I update... Eugenie Lyzenko

04/06/2022

02:36 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > The question. If I update to this version for big customer... Constantin Asofiei

02:36 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > The question. If I update to this version for big customer project, and convert it the... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:31 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

> The question. If I update to this version for big customer project, and convert it the generated Java code will *no... Constantin Asofiei

02:30 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Constantin: Please apply the patch t... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:48 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Greg Shah wrote:
> If it is required for your current work, then please add the stubs.
So far I have several doze... Igor Skornyakov

09:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Constantin: Please apply the patch t... Greg Shah

09:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and pus... Igor Skornyakov

09:26 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and push to xfer and proj.goldencode.c... Constantin Asofiei

08:39 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and push to xfer and proj.goldencode.com (see [[p2j:Downlo... Greg Shah

03:11 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Attached a skeleton patch for @Progress.Security@ classes. Marian Edu

03/25/2022

01:13 PM Bug #5294 (Closed): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue

Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 13690
No objections. Greg Shah

12:51 PM Bug #5294 (Review): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue

Constantin Asofiei

12:51 PM Bug #5294 (WIP): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue

Thanks, the patch is in 3821c/13690.
Constantin Asofiei

12:36 PM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue

There is no way to comment out the rule definition itself. You can use @/* */@ or @//@ comments inside a rule to rem... Greg Shah

10:47 AM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue

Greg, how do I comment the rule in antlr? I can't neither with @/**/@ or with @//@.
These rules need to be commen... Constantin Asofiei

03/22/2022

02:58 PM Bug #5288: Some date field character comparisons have runtime incompatibilities during runtime

The attached patch is a partial fix, which hasn't been checked in. I wanted to make sure it is kept with this task. Roger Borrello

03/11/2022

12:50 PM Feature #6161 (Closed): add support for DYNAMIC-PROPERTY() built-in function and DYNAMIC-PROPERTY...

Greg Shah

03/09/2022

04:20 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the root cause is that there is a @catch (Exception)@ in some p2j.oo code. This... Marian Edu