Activity
From 03/23/2022 to 04/21/2022
04/14/2022
- 03:26 PM Feature #6280: date literal // quirk
- The presence of certain malformed separators can be matched and sometimes causes a date literal to have an unexpected...
- 03:22 PM Feature #6280 (New): date literal // quirk
04/12/2022
- 03:04 AM Bug #6268: Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
- The inconsistency regarding emoji length of the JVM versus other runtimes is nicely explained at "Emojis, Java and St...
04/11/2022
- 03:32 PM Bug #6268: Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
- Defer.
- 02:44 PM Bug #6268: Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
- Greg,
What is our plan here? Do we need to work on this now or can be deferred?
04/08/2022
- 06:34 PM Bug #6268: Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
- Small pic showing the end status for now. Please attach to the new bug issue along with this comment.
Using @the g... - 06:32 PM Bug #6268: Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
- The patch to unlock negative @ASC@ code conversion.
- 06:29 PM Bug #6268 (New): Characters encoding issues with UTF-8 for emoji and confusable symbols.
04/07/2022
- 08:45 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > > The question. If I update...
04/06/2022
- 02:36 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > The question. If I update to this version for big customer... - 02:36 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > The question. If I update to this version for big customer project, and convert it the... - 02:31 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- > The question. If I update to this version for big customer project, and convert it the generated Java code will *no...
- 02:30 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Constantin: Please apply the patch t... - 09:48 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If it is required for your current work, then please add the stubs.
So far I have several doze... - 09:44 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Constantin: Please apply the patch t... - 09:40 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and pus... - 09:26 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and push to xfer and proj.goldencode.c... - 08:39 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin: Please apply the patch to the skeleton project and push to xfer and proj.goldencode.com (see [[p2j:Downlo...
- 03:11 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Attached a skeleton patch for @Progress.Security@ classes.
03/25/2022
- 01:13 PM Bug #5294 (Closed): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 13690
No objections. - 12:51 PM Bug #5294 (Review): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- 12:51 PM Bug #5294 (WIP): parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Thanks, the patch is in 3821c/13690.
- 12:36 PM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- There is no way to comment out the rule definition itself. You can use @/* */@ or @//@ comments inside a rule to rem...
- 10:47 AM Bug #5294: parsing problems for assign-style statements with a OO chained lvalue
- Greg, how do I comment the rule in antlr? I can't neither with @/**/@ or with @//@.
These rules need to be commen...
Also available in: Atom