Activity
From 12/07/2022 to 01/05/2023
01/05/2023
- 02:37 PM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > You also need checks if this is the single resource in the chain being deleted, in this firstResource/lastResource ...
- 06:20 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Attached is a space-delimited file with all FOR EACH loops which have a List, ArrayList ... - 04:26 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Forgot to add the csv file.
- 04:25 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Keep in mind that this:...
- 04:25 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > what branch and revision did you use for this patch?
>
> 3821c rev 14467.
The patch ... - 01:54 PM Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- Attached is a trace file with @ContextLocal.get@ usage in a customer application. This is expanded on 3 levels, leve...
- 08:10 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > > Is this different than @MESSAGE VIEW-AS ALERT-BOX@? Or is this just the case where the 4GL handles the really lo...
- 08:10 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > It is @ContextLocal@, which creates an instance of the log manager wrapper through @class Fallback extends ThreadLo...
- 07:57 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We must solve this properly. The behavior needs to match the 4GL implementation while implementi... - 07:51 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this different than @MESSAGE VIEW-AS ALERT-BOX@? Or is this just the case where the 4GL handl... - 07:49 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Our implementation of @LOG-MANAGER@ runs purely on the server.
>
> It is certainly preferab... - 07:48 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > Do we want also the 32767 chars limit for @LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE@?
Yes. Also, please implement the limit of... - 06:47 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- A few observations in relationship to max log message length (tested):
* By default statement length is limited to... - 04:47 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Does the 4GL have an implicit set of settings for @LOG-MANAGER@ in an appserver process? If so, ... - 03:50 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya: please post what logmanager related config needs to added.
4GL LOG-MANAGER con... - 03:06 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> For @logthreshold@ and @numlogfiles@ and the other items from #3853-19, we should be able to conf...
01/04/2023
- 02:44 PM Feature #6817 (WIP): replace INSTANTIATING-PROCEDURE and other handle<ExternalProgram> with the a...
- 11:23 AM Feature #6817: replace INSTANTIATING-PROCEDURE and other handle<ExternalProgram> with the actual ...
- In Eclipse, there is a way to look for a field or local variable of a certain type. Other IDEs should have something...
- 12:46 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> From Galya via email:
>
> > I've tested gui, batch, web gui clients and they are working well ... - 12:33 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- From Galya via email:
> I've tested gui, batch, web gui clients and they are working well with @LOG-MANAGER@. But ... - 12:29 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- For @logthreshold@ and @numlogfiles@ and the other items from #3853-19, we should be able to configure these via 2 me...
- 08:04 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> open a @-debugalert@ separate task (maybe #4065 or this one #3853) to migrate the logic to ... - 07:55 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> P.S.S. The easiest quickest patch to complete #5753 would be to just switch the dependency ... - 04:58 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- *Current clientlog implementation and -debugalert*
Currently the code uses @-clientlog@ startup param to enable lo... - 03:10 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- *Rotation and testing*
A substantial part of LOG-MANAGER's logic is related to handling rotation of log files and is... - 08:54 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > what branch and revision did you use for this patch?
3821c rev 14467. - 05:17 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Related to map access (hashCode calls):
> > ** @HandleChain.delete@ 880k
>
> Maybe w... - 05:13 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Please review the diff which replaces "for-each" loops with indexed "for" loops (I'll add ... - 08:32 AM Feature #6824 (WIP): lazy initialization of collection class members
01/03/2023
- 02:54 PM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Related to map access (hashCode calls):
> ** @HandleChain.delete@ 880k
Maybe we don't need to perform @first/la... - 08:33 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > Do we show the same error when LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE tries to write more than 15000 chars? If yes, then we'll h...
01/02/2023
- 05:21 PM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Please review the diff which replaces "for-each" loops with indexed "for" loops (I'll add headers later), specificall...
12/28/2022
- 07:27 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please use @PROVERSION@ and preprocessing to conditionally implement logic by OE version.
...
12/23/2022
- 11:55 AM Feature #6824: lazy initialization of collection class members
- Some notes :
* @BufferImpl.callbacks@ can be lazily created, not all buffers are used in FILL operations.
* @Record... - 08:30 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- @LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE@ supports by default text up to 15000 characters (actually it should be less, since that i...
- 05:45 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, ple...
12/21/2022
- 02:29 PM Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- I think the @object@ fields need to remain as-is, for the reference counting to work (which affects when these get de...
- 02:28 PM Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- This code:...
- 09:38 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, please review and use this one for...
12/20/2022
- 02:19 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, please review and use this one for your tests.
- 04:40 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've tested with a 'static bytecode' (i.e. 10k .java files each with 300 lambdas, checked the disassembled .class and...
- 07:47 AM Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you have specific areas seen in profiling where these old-style primitives are heavily involve... - 06:24 AM Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- Do you have specific areas seen in profiling where these old-style primitives are heavily involved?
- 03:22 AM Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- FWD code contains many places where old-style synchronization primitives (@synchronized@ blocks, @wait@/@notify@) are...
- 02:58 AM Feature #7000 (New): Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
12/19/2022
- 06:08 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > > The base implementation is already handled at conversion and it is stubbed out in the runtime.
>
> Does it mea... - 06:35 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The base implementation is already handled at conversion and it is stubbed out in the runtime.
... - 11:28 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- For @ArrayList.iterator()@, the top callers are:
* @PreselectQuery.components()@ - 430k
* @AnnotatedAst.notifyListe... - 10:26 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- The ones that are most important are listed in #6821-4. We aren't suggesting changing things everywhere.
- 10:22 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- That may be true. There're about 2k foreach loops, and about 10% of them can be updated. If we want, we can can limit...
- 09:57 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in a... - 09:56 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Small improvements over millions of calls add up. The fact that the profiling tools don't show obvious hotspots mean...
- 09:45 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I would perform benchmarking/profiling first.
>
> This is what was done. See #6821-4.
Th... - 09:31 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > The point with all the Map and Set iterators is that they allocate lots of short-lived objects.
That's true. I m... - 09:25 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in all situations.
I did som... - 09:18 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > I would perform benchmarking/profiling first.
This is what was done. See #6821-4. - 05:12 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in all situations. See e.g. a dis...
- 04:54 AM Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I assume we're taking about replacing
Correct.
> I found that there're not so many plac... - 04:45 AM Feature #6821 (WIP): java collection performance
- Constantin,
> For example, using Java for-each loop for an an ArrayList instead of a @for@ and getting the element... - 09:08 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > the performance decreased a lot (there may be some internal storage which affects the INVOKEDYNAMIC instruction at ...
- 09:08 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- From Constantin:
> More with the the lambda for ControlFlowOps, I think the lambda performance is directly proport...
12/16/2022
- 03:31 AM Bug #6999: OO methods/properties used in direct Java calls
- Consider this type:...
- 03:27 AM Bug #6999 (New): OO methods/properties used in direct Java calls
12/15/2022
- 09:28 AM Feature #6827 (WIP): reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs...
- Sorry, guys, I think I've reviewed all FWD classes implemening @WrappedResource@ but there're no usages of BDT. I've ...
12/14/2022
- 01:26 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- The lambdas will created like this:...
- 09:15 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Yes, please use @PROVERSION@ and preprocessing to conditionally implement logic by OE version.
- 09:09 AM Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Greg Shah wrote:
> OE 11.7.x is in use right now. They can't move to OE 12 without facing serious issues which have... - 07:42 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can you do something low effort to work around this issue until we have 6129b changes ready?
I... - 07:32 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Can you do something low effort to work around this issue until we have 6129b changes ready?
12/13/2022
- 04:54 PM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please check your failing scenario in 6129b and let us know what you find.
Yes, in... - 04:53 PM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Check your classpath. ConvertedClassName no longer exists in 6129b.
Yes, I forgot to ... - 04:29 PM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Check your classpath. ConvertedClassName no longer exists in 6129b.
- 03:43 PM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please check your failing scenario in 6129b and let us know what you find.
I canno... - 02:04 PM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Our OO implementation is much more advanced in vranch 6129b than in 3821c. In 6129b, at this time we only use @Legac...
- 07:30 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> No, it is the Java sources which will not compile.
> Note: the name if the field ref... - 07:24 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Marian Edu wrote:
> All classes in @OpenEdge@ and @Progress@ packages were created *manually*, this is the expecte... - 07:13 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The fields in @OpenEdge.Core.DataTypeEnum@ are named after the corresponding Progress b... - 06:59 AM Bug #6993 (Review): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Fixed in 3821c rev. 14438.
- 06:45 AM Bug #6993 (WIP): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- 06:42 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Please do fix this.
- 06:31 AM Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- The fields in @OpenEdge.Core.DataTypeEnum@ are named after the corresponding Progress base data types, like @characte...
- 06:24 AM Bug #6993 (Closed): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
12/08/2022
- 03:13 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Yes. I assume the proxy case is being worked on in #6939.
- 02:42 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg, the 8 million iterations chosen for the MthdTest was because this is the number of Utils.invoke for a large app...
- 01:52 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > How will it pass the parameters?
We can handle this with a bit of "standardization" in the registration or via a... - 01:41 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've tested something like this (for my original MthdTest):...
- 12:52 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an i... - 12:41 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an initializer. It could be an arr... - 11:24 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an initializer. It could be an array where each elemen...
- 11:20 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg, for ControlFlowOps, this lambda method approach can't be easily used - because we will have to generate 'on the...
- 10:13 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > For this, we need to change the FWD proxy impl to send the lambda beside the Method to the handler.
Eric's idea ... - 10:03 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm especially excited to see how this improves the @ControlFlowOps@ usage since we could elimina... - 08:02 AM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I'm especially excited to see how this improves the @ControlFlowOps@ usage since we could eliminate the dispatching c...
- 09:04 PM Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've been working on a different approach to this problem. The original problem noted above is that ReflectASM and J...
Also available in: Atom