FWD » Core Development » User Interface

09/23/2021

10:41 AM Bug #5682: Buttons rendering issues

I ran the uast tests for buttons some time ago, and this is what I gathered:
Button image related:
# Any test u... Vladimir Tsichevski

10:37 AM Bug #5682 (New): Buttons rendering issues

Vladimir Tsichevski

09/22/2021

03:43 PM Bug #5214: Broken z-order for all driver widgets (including SPREADSHEET, HTML-BROWSER, etc.)

Is there any reason to leave this task open? Greg Shah

01:34 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Fixed in 3821c rev. 12975
>
> I think the changes are OK, j... Vladimir Tsichevski

12:44 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Fixed in 3821c rev. 12975
I think the changes are OK, just move the static methods b... Hynek Cihlar

11:46 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 3821c revision 12897.
>
> Please test how the method @remove@ will behave when ... Vladimir Tsichevski

09/21/2021

06:06 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Node navigation: @Next@, @Previous@, @FirstSibling@, @LastSibling@. Then applied to the... Vladimir Tsichevski

06:06 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The @Parent@ setter is not currently implemented.
>
> In OCX, setting the node paren... Vladimir Tsichevski

05:59 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Node navigation: @Next@, @Previous@, @FirstSibling@, @LastSibling@. Then applied to the tree root, these methods must... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:53 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

The @Parent@ setter is not currently implemented.
In OCX, setting the node parent node always makes the node first... Vladimir Tsichevski

09/20/2021

07:51 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

The @EnsureVisible@ operation is broken for @TREEVIEW@. Here I call the operation for the first child of the @Root@ n... Vladimir Tsichevski

09/14/2021

04:46 AM Feature #5223: SPREADSHEET: Implement formula circular references

Keikai dev team released a test release with the added support of circular references and its parametrization through... Hynek Cihlar

09/10/2021

07:06 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

In 3821c rev. 12916:
# added conversion of @DRAGGED-NODE@ and @DRAGGED-OVER-NODE@ getters (See #5172-81);
# fixed: ... Vladimir Tsichevski

05:19 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

@KeyDown@ event handler conversion error: the first event argument must be of @INPUT-OUTPUT@ type instead of @INPUT@,... Vladimir Tsichevski

05:17 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Then @TREEVIEW@ loses keyboard focus, the selected node highlight should be removed. Vladimir Tsichevski

05:14 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Scrolling issue:
>
> # Run @treeview.p@ application
> # Expand enough nodes to make... Vladimir Tsichevski

09/09/2021

03:01 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Code review 3821c revision 12897.
Please test how the method @remove@ will behave when a convertibe number is pass... Hynek Cihlar

09/08/2021

06:16 PM Feature #5151: Add complete support for tree-list OCX triggers

The second argument for the @OnKeyDown@ event is *integer* key modifiers mask. It is currently converted as @new logi... Vladimir Tsichevski

05:31 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Some of @TREEVIEW@ events expect arguments of @INPUT-OUTPUT@ type. For example, the arg... Vladimir Tsichevski

05:21 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Some of @TREEVIEW@ events expect arguments of @INPUT-OUTPUT@ type. For example, the argument @KeyCode@ of the @KeyPre... Vladimir Tsichevski

09:18 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

If needed, there was a conversion of the customer application using 12899. Please see #5034-1173 for details.
Roger Borrello

04:22 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Hynek, can you please help me?
>
> What is the proper way to set the widget default ... Hynek Cihlar

09/07/2021

06:27 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > Does the @ocx_conversion.rules@ requir... Eugenie Lyzenko

06:19 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> Does the @ocx_conversion.rules@ require urgent reconversion of big custome... Vladimir Tsichevski

04:49 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Vladimir,
Does the @ocx_conversion.rules@ require urgent reconversion of big customer application? I need to take ... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:56 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

Hynek, can you please help me?
What is the proper way to set the widget default mouse pointer icon? By this I mean... Vladimir Tsichevski

03:31 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues

In 3821c rev. 12897 the following issues has been fixed:
# Partial (mostly conversion only) support added for @TRE... Vladimir Tsichevski

09/03/2021

07:59 AM Bug #5280 (Test): TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Tree...

Greg Shah

06:22 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Code review 3821c revision 12882. The changes are OK. Hynek Cihlar

09/02/2021

11:52 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
>
> > >Doesn't the replacement widget in #3822 use the @TREEV... Eugenie Lyzenko

11:42 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> >Doesn't the replacement widget in #3822 use the @TREEVIEW@ code internally?
>
> Yes, ... Vladimir Tsichevski

10:58 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?... Eugenie Lyzenko

10:49 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

> > Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?
>
> Do you mean ... Greg Shah

10:43 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?
... Eugenie Lyzenko

10:14 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822? Greg Shah

09:24 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: We generally don't add random features. Why was the feature there if it is not needed?... Vladimir Tsichevski

08:59 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...

Vladimir: We generally don't add random features. Why was the feature there if it is not needed? I'm worried that i... Greg Shah