Activity
From 03/21/2014 to 04/19/2014
04/09/2014
- 03:31 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can check in and distribute the update.
Committed to bzr rev 10507.
04/08/2014
- 03:32 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- You can check in and distribute the update.
- 02:42 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- This fixes the incompatibility when running the callgraph on a machine with different case-sensitivity than the one f...
04/03/2014
- 05:49 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- The branch rev 10504 contains the fix for generating the callgraph reports on windows (the filename should have been ...
03/26/2014
- 03:49 PM Feature #2251 (Closed): improve the call graph generation
- 02:23 PM Feature #2251 (Review): improve the call graph generation
- 02:23 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Branch revision 10518 was committed to the 10496/10497, both on trunk master on devsrv01 and filesrv01.
03/25/2014
- 04:15 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- > Regarding note 97: I think bzr merge should do the trick, to merge the branch into the trunk
Yes, that was my pl... - 02:12 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- The update passed runtime and conversion testing (both server and MAJIC code).
Regarding note 97: I think @bzr mer... - 03:49 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > BTW, to "release" a branch to the trunk, is there another way beside just copying the branch co...
03/24/2014
- 03:26 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- > BTW, to "release" a branch to the trunk, is there another way beside just copying the branch content (without the ....
- 02:21 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- See the branch 10517 revision (which was rebased) for the latest changes (some doc changes and a minor fix). This is ...
- 06:44 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. What is your general sense about the performance? Do you feel it is "good", "bad" or somethin...
03/21/2014
- 01:27 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- I saw your note about the performance metrics in #2260. The numbers seem pretty good for processing such a large pro...
- 01:24 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Code Review branch rev 10514
I am good with the changes. If you still think it is finished, go ahead with regress... - 12:40 PM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Branch rev 10514 adds the "-u" argument for CallGraphGenerator, which uses the passed filename list and all ambiguous...
- 10:17 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> One question: it looks to me like each call-graph run is fresh and we don't support incremental c... - 09:20 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Code Review branch rev 10513
Everything looks good.
One question: it looks to me like each call-graph run is fr... - 08:44 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- > I think I'm missing some index configuration, as CallGraphWorker.findNodeById doesn't look like it uses an index (i...
- 08:40 AM Feature #2251: improve the call graph generation
- Code Review branch rev 10512
Everything looks good, except that the ProgressPatternWorker change is not needed. @...
Also available in: Atom