Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 02/16/2017 to 03/17/2017

03/15/2017

09:58 AM Feature #3265: enhance pphints to have references, expansions and details in and about directives
The pphints mechanism was deliberately implemented to only contain information regarding code that exists in the full... Greg Shah
09:52 AM Feature #3265 (New): enhance pphints to have references, expansions and details in and about dire...
Greg Shah
09:50 AM Bug #3256 (Closed): comments disappear inside strings when the preprocessor evaluates expressions
3255a was merged to trunk as revision 11143. Greg Shah

03/14/2017

01:57 PM Bug #3242 (Closed): parser console output written out of order
Additional changes were applied by ECF in branch 3255a, which was merged to trunk as revision 11143. At this time, a... Greg Shah
11:18 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes.
>
> I'm doing the final cleanup on language statements. Consider that complete.
>
> I... Eugenie Lyzenko
11:17 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Yes.
I'm doing the final cleanup on language statements. Consider that complete.
I'll let you know the next pr... Greg Shah
11:10 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> I've created task branch 1521b from trunk 11143.
So any further updated for this task will be ... Eugenie Lyzenko
09:20 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
I've created task branch 1521b from trunk 11143. Greg Shah
09:19 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
ETF testing passed. Re-run of reporting was successful. Testing is complete.
3255a has been merged to trunk as ... Greg Shah
05:59 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
3255a branch revision 11145 passed ChUI regression testing. The conversion result was identical with trunk. The run... Greg Shah

03/13/2017

03:21 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
3255a is locked for regression testing. I'm going to test using rev 11145. Greg Shah
12:20 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
No, this is because we built this from a combination of 1521a and 3209e. Then a later version of 3209e was merged to... Greg Shah
12:12 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> 3255a has been "rebased" from trunk 11142. The rebase process is broken for this branch so I had... Eugenie Lyzenko
11:07 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
3255a has been "rebased" from trunk 11142. The rebase process is broken for this branch so I had to merge. The late... Greg Shah
10:47 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
> You mean for example the cases like:
> ...
> We need to include only:
...
> And NOT to include:
...
> becuse ... Greg Shah
09:46 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3255a Revision 11147
>
> This was a good start, but there were many er... Eugenie Lyzenko
09:24 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Code Review Task Branch 3255a Revision 11147
This was a good start, but there were many errors. Some problems wer... Greg Shah

03/11/2017

09:58 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @3255a@ for review updated to revision @11147@.
Finishing import the language statements from @progres... Eugenie Lyzenko

03/10/2017

05:38 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
> I have not found KW_BLK_LVL keyword(block_level_stmt in progress.g). This keyword does not have the statement?
... Greg Shah
09:41 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @3255a@ for review updated to revision @11144@.
Importing language statements from @progress.g@ file. ... Eugenie Lyzenko

03/09/2017

01:51 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Code Review Task Branch 1521a Revision 11143
1. @put-bits@ is fully supported. It is not part of @memptr@. It is... Greg Shah

03/08/2017

05:04 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @3255a@ for review updated to revision @11143@.
This is the first step for iterative creation of the l... Eugenie Lyzenko

03/07/2017

11:56 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
3255a is now based on trunk revision 11141. I could not use the normal rebase process since this branch was composed... Greg Shah
11:26 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Consider 3255a locked. I am rebasing it right now. Greg Shah
11:13 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Please create @lang_stmts.rules@. Language statements cover all areas.
To see the matching criteria, look at the ... Greg Shah
11:02 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: your next task is to encode marking rules for the following:
>
> * language statement... Eugenie Lyzenko
08:35 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
I will do this shortly. Greg Shah
08:08 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Put the changes in 3255a. Please make sure you don't break anything with your check-ins, because... Eugenie Lyzenko
07:40 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Put the changes in 3255a. Please make sure you don't break anything with your check-ins, because others are working ... Greg Shah
07:33 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: your next task is to encode marking rules for the following:
>
> * language statement... Eugenie Lyzenko
07:27 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Eugenie: your next task is to encode marking rules for the following:
* language statements (we just need to mark ... Greg Shah
07:18 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
1521a has been archived.
3255a contains a large number of improvements including some cleanup of the frame/browse/... Greg Shah

03/06/2017

09:24 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> The latest version of 1521a is 11164. I have merged this into 3255a. Please do NOT do any addit... Eugenie Lyzenko

03/04/2017

12:09 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> The latest version of 1521a is 11164. I have merged this into 3255a. Please do NOT do any addit... Eugenie Lyzenko
10:34 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
The latest version of 1521a is 11164. I have merged this into 3255a. Please do NOT do any additional development on... Greg Shah

03/03/2017

07:33 PM Bug #3256: comments disappear inside strings when the preprocessor evaluates expressions
This is fixed in 3255a revision 11223. Greg Shah

03/02/2017

04:19 PM Bug #3256: comments disappear inside strings when the preprocessor evaluates expressions
The following program (see @testcases/uast/comments_disappear_inside_strings_when_the_preprocessor_evaluates_expressi... Greg Shah
04:15 PM Bug #3256 (Closed): comments disappear inside strings when the preprocessor evaluates expressions
Greg Shah

02/17/2017

08:29 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11163@.
Adding changes in @gap_analysis_marking.xml@ to:
1. E... Eugenie Lyzenko
06:12 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
> If the mark has been found on some step -> we can ignore further steps, saving CPU time, like this:
Good idea.
... Greg Shah
07:42 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11162@.
In this update the global variables and built-in funct... Eugenie Lyzenko

02/16/2017

03:47 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11161@.
Preparing candidate for global variables and built-in ... Eugenie Lyzenko
01:09 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> > And I have reviewed the changes in 3209e since this merge. Do you think something is missed?
>... Eugenie Lyzenko
12:21 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
> And I have reviewed the changes in 3209e since this merge. Do you think something is missed?
Yes, I think there ... Greg Shah
12:18 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please go ahead with adding all of these, including the webspeed functions. Treat the websp... Eugenie Lyzenko
05:03 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
Yes, please go ahead with adding all of these, including the webspeed functions. Treat the webspeed functions just l... Greg Shah
 

Also available in: Atom