Activity
From 09/30/2022 to 10/29/2022
10/28/2022
- 05:07 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Issues #6237-187 (automatic disabling the engine) and #6237-186 (@@TestSuite@ support) resolved in the patch @6237-18...
10/27/2022
- 05:29 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- FWD test engine instantiation requires a connection to a FWD server. If this connection fails, the engine creation en...
- 12:35 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- As the temporary workaround (just to continue the development), I can use the Java class names in the legacy 4gl sour...
- 04:39 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Here I need to know the Java class names for legacy clas...
10/26/2022
- 05:09 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Here I need to know the Java class names for legacy classes @unittests.SimpleTestOEUnit... - 04:20 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please just read the @pkgname@ and @classname@ annotations from the root node of the AST. You sh... - 02:35 PM Bug #6889: rollback the files as 'unconverted' if (incremental) conversion fails.
- When incremental conversion is ran, once the parse phase finishes, a file is marked 'converted'. But, incremental co...
- 02:34 PM Bug #6889 (Test): rollback the files as 'unconverted' if (incremental) conversion fails.
- 01:37 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> @OEUnit@ supports dynamic test suites, for example:
>
> [...]
>
> I think, we wil...
10/21/2022
- 04:12 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- For now, keep using the Java names.
- 12:57 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Question: shall we use legacy names as display names or converted... - 12:49 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Question: shall we use legacy names as display names or converted Java class and method... - 12:46 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- The updates in @6237-182-r14314.diff@:
# Legacy procedures-based tests support added: conversion and runtime.
# T... - 12:22 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Question: shall we use legacy names as display names or converted Java class and method names?
10/20/2022
- 10:24 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> I think, the correct code is:
>
> [...]
Yes, the config needs to be marked 'persist... - 10:23 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Vladimir, what exactly are you trying to achieve? Gener... - 10:13 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For example: @new InvokeConfig(<program>).setProcedureHandle(h).run(arguments);@.
I... - 09:00 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vladimir, what exactly are you trying to achieve? Generate Java code? Write Java code b... - 06:35 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir, what exactly are you trying to achieve? Generate Java code? Write Java code by hand?
Direct usage of @C...
10/19/2022
- 05:40 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- I am implementing the procedure-based unit tests for @ABLUnit@, and I do not know the proper way to create procedure ...
- 05:13 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Unlike JUnit5, @OEUnit@ uses a single instance to run all instance-related test methods in the class (JUnit5 by defau...
- 08:50 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Issues #6237-156, #6237-163 and #6237-170 now fixed in @6237-173-r14306.diff@. The diff is against the FWD rev. 14306.
- 08:35 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The first method is not possible, since there is no such place in the custom test engine code, ... - 08:00 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- > The first method is not possible, since there is no such place in the custom test engine code, where all root test ...
- 07:54 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Please just read the @pkgname@ and @classname@ annotations from the root node of the AST. You should not be converti...
10/18/2022
- 05:14 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Another problem to solve related to test method discovery:
# the user requests running a Java package as JUnit Tes... - 04:18 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- I need to convert legacy class names to converted Java class name (simple names and FQN). Which library method should...
- 11:34 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- > I need to either find the place in the code, in which the prog.symbol can be converted to java symbol and fix it
... - 11:32 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The @SYMBOL@ you are referencing may be the @prog.symbol@ type. Notice this is in the @prog@ (fo... - 10:49 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- The @SYMBOL@ you are referencing may be the @prog.symbol@ type. Notice this is in the @prog@ (for @Progress@) namesp...
- 10:05 AM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We wouldn't get very far in conversion if we couldn't emit symbols or data types. The authoritat...
10/17/2022
- 07:22 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- We wouldn't get very far in conversion if we couldn't emit symbols or data types. The authoritative source of how Ja...
- 07:07 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- I need to create a Java annotation of the following type:...
- 06:15 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- @dbref/collect_refs.xml@ is currently disabled code and was left there on purpose. It is intended to identify refere...
- 04:28 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- About the legacy annotation attribute values.
Annotations containing attributes can look like this:... - 03:57 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- I found, that to convert a Java array to @java.util.List@, the @createListFromObject@ library function can be used.
... - 03:29 PM Support #6848: TRPL questions and issues
- Questions about the TRPL language should be posted and discussed here.
- 03:27 PM Support #6848 (New): TRPL questions and issues
- 08:16 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Think about it and try to estimate the changes that are needed.
OK - 07:52 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Think about it and try to estimate the changes that are needed.
- 07:46 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > We will need to support dynamic tests then: the tests which are created in runtime by executing... - 07:20 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- > We will need to support dynamic tests then: the tests which are created in runtime by executing customer 4gl code. ...
- 07:12 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > I think, we will not support these, ins... - 07:05 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I think, we will not support these, instead the declarative app...
10/14/2022
- 03:32 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Current implementation was developed in assumption that the @discover@ method of a test engine is called by the test ...
- 02:43 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Test inheritance is implemented in @OEUnit@: not only the methods in the class are disc... - 01:46 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Annotations conversion bug found: wrong Java annotation generated: @@BeforeAll@ instead... - 01:34 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Annotations conversion bug found: wrong Java annotation generated: @@BeforeAll@ instead of @@BeforeEach@ and @@After...
- 11:47 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Test inheritance is implemented in @OEUnit@: not only the methods in the class are discovered, but also methods in su...
- 10:12 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think, we will not support these, instead the declarative approach will be used, so the same ... - 10:11 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- > I think, we will not support these, instead the declarative approach will be used, so the same class will look like...
- 10:06 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- @OEUnit@ supports dynamic test suites, for example:...
10/13/2022
- 04:18 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The key question that must be answered about OEUnit and ABLUnit is whether each test or each te... - 03:45 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- In @OEUnit@ test methods annotated with @@Ignore@, are not executed, but a test result with the status @Ignored@ is g...
- 02:48 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- @OEUnit@ runs the after tests methods even when the before test methods and tests methods sequence ended prematurely ...
- 02:36 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- @OEUnit@ has two more annotations: @DataProvider@ and @Fixture@. We probably need learn their meaning and add the sup...
- 02:32 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- At least, @OEUnit@ discovers test recursively (when a test class is a test suite, references classes may be test suit...
- 08:29 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- > I suppose FWD expects that everything is executed in some top-level 4gl procedure. In our case we have no such proc...
10/12/2022
- 06:14 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Now tests can be executed remotely. See @6237-remote.diff@.
Here it is how it looks when running the @Run as... > ...
10/05/2022
- 05:48 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Yes, I assumed as much. It is exactly why I suggested that we create a new thread to execute @ClientCore.start()@ in...
- 03:31 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As part of my suggestion in #6237-61, I was assuming that the test engine client would "Define th... - 03:27 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- As part of my suggestion in #6237-61, I was assuming that the test engine client would "Define the lambda as a execut...
- 03:00 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- I see some problem here.
The JUnit5 testing life cycle assumes the program is being called from outside multiple t...
10/04/2022
- 06:51 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- To pass test descriptors over network, we need to make them @Serializable@ or @Externalizable@. Original POS test des...
10/03/2022
- 12:59 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- I have no objection to the bootstrap cfg approach.
- 12:09 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> I think, we can use the @BootstrapConfig@ to pass the test engine discover request data... - 10:20 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- I think, we can use the @BootstrapConfig@ to pass the test engine discover request data from test runner (e.g. Eclips...
- 09:13 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- One more change required for the JUnin5 framework would able to discover the custom test engine.
See @6237-addon.d...
09/30/2022
- 02:05 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As list of pending changes as noted by Vladimir via email:
>
> [...]
>
> For changes 1 thro...
Also available in: Atom