Activity
From 03/19/2023 to 04/17/2023
04/17/2023
- 02:33 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> You should call @TransactionManager.popScope@ during the opposite lifecycle phase of the cla... - 02:21 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- 6237a rebased to the latest trunk, #3827-275 and #3827-282 fixed in rev. 14603.
04/13/2023
- 08:23 AM Feature #6237 (WIP): OEUnit support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> You should call @TransactionManager.popScope@ during the opposite lifecycle phase of the cla... - 08:08 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code review 6237a.
> >
> > @FWDEngineDescriptor@ doesn't po... - 07:18 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> At the moment I cannot reproduce the situation with too many log messages though, so ... - 07:14 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 6237a.
>
> @FWDEngineDescriptor@ doesn't pop the root transaction scope.
Pleas... - 06:08 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Code review 6237a.
@FWDEngineDescriptor@ doesn't pop the root transaction scope.
In @UnitTestServer@ the @NoCla...
04/12/2023
- 10:50 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- 6237a rebased to trunk rev. 14532, the revision is 14595. Please, review.
04/11/2023
- 11:10 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Vladimir, there are issues with 6237a.
> * It is based on old trunk revision.
May be so
> *... - 11:02 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir, there are issues with 6237a.
* It is based on old trunk revision.
* It is based on 3827a.
* And it is ba...
04/10/2023
- 09:43 AM Feature #6237 (Review): OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Fixture feature implemented.
>
> The branch is 6237a, revision 14583.
> What else...
04/06/2023
- 10:22 AM Support #7257: Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- I have been using some varieties of the below description in some applications' @server.sh@ and/or @client.sh@ such t...
- 07:05 AM Support #7257: Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I prefer the first option.
Yes, that is the cleaner way.
- 07:04 AM Support #7257: Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- I think we need to handle customer libs more explicitly.
* Isolate them into their own static directory. OR
* Ad... - 06:54 AM Support #7257: Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- Cleaning up the entire @deploy/lib@ at @deploy.prepare@ will remove any customer-specific jars (like for web apps run...
- 06:49 AM Support #7257: Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- When we change jar files to move to new versions, we get into a scenario where a @deploy.prepare@ leaves multiple ver...
- 06:45 AM Support #7257 (New): Should deploy.prepare delete all contents of deploy/lib/ before copying?
- 08:21 AM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Fixture feature implemented.
The branch is 6237a, revision 14583.
This branch includes (and relies upon) unpubl...
04/05/2023
- 09:47 AM Bug #7255: FWD resolves a OO file not included in conversion, if it exists on disk and on PROPATH
- For an application, you can have a @abl/src1/oo/Bar.cls@ and @abl/src2/oo/Bar.cls@. In conversion, you include only ...
- 09:43 AM Bug #7255 (Test): FWD resolves a OO file not included in conversion, if it exists on disk and on ...
03/30/2023
- 06:51 AM Feature #6256: improved profile support
- There is a problem when the 'exclude' filter is used to not add files to conversion. During pre-scan phase, the filt...
03/28/2023
- 02:02 PM Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We only need to qualify things if the code uses a class that is in conflict. Qualifying all the ...
Also available in: Atom