Activity
From 04/09/2023 to 05/08/2023
05/06/2023
- 08:04 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ rebased with trunk revision @14561@. New branch version is @14562@.
05/05/2023
- 05:08 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ rebased with trunk revision @14560@. New branch version is @14561@.
05/04/2023
- 05:39 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ rebased with trunk revision @14559@. New branch version is @14560@.
- 03:22 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Roger,
> >
> > You have multiple chunks because the new conso... - 11:31 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Roger,
> >
> > You have multiple chunks because the new conso... - 11:00 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ rebased with trunk revision @14555@. New branch version is @14556@.
- 09:57 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger,
>
> You have multiple chunks because the new console session should be opened to ... - 09:12 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Should there be a location within the FWD directory structure to place the library for consiste... - 08:43 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- > Should there be a location within the FWD directory structure to place the library for consistency? Like @build/usr...
- 08:32 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Should there be a location within the FWD directory structure to place the library for consistency? Like @build/usrli...
05/03/2023
- 03:56 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ rebased with trunk revision @14554@. New branch version is @14555@.
- 02:28 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg,
This is automated script for review. It should be run inside directory where the patched @NCURSES@ to be ins... - 11:52 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- > Do we need this script to be the part of the @FWD@ trunk repository? Or this should be a standalone unit can be dow...
05/02/2023
- 06:41 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> We need to automate the process for creating the *local* (not system-wide) patched version. ... - 03:52 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Added new page for [[p2j:Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking]] can be seen from "Building FWD From Source":/project...
- 02:52 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > I have updated instructions to use static linking. Please review. It ... - 02:27 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I have updated instructions to use static linking. Please review. It is important everyone ... - 01:09 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- The @5167a@ updated for review to revision @14554@.
All required @FWD@ changes to move to the @NCURSES@ static lin... - 12:58 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I will review the instructions shortly. We do need to make sure that we have a plan for all cust... - 12:46 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- I will review the instructions shortly. We do need to make sure that we have a plan for all customers to migrate the...
- 12:19 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- I have updated instructions to use static linking. Please review. It is important everyone see it as clear and able t...
- 11:44 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Are there steps to migrate from _dynamic-linked and patched_ to _static linked/no-patch_? On... - 11:36 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Are there steps to migrate from _dynamic-linked and patched_ to _static linked/no-patch_? Once we have a trunk that i...
- 11:16 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I am OK with this.
The next steps:
1. I'm creating @5167a@ branch to commit @FWD@ changes.
... - 10:53 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- I am OK with this.
- 10:52 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Don't we already require that @libncurses-dev@ is installed to compile? ([[p2j:Install NCURSES D... - 09:12 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger: Are the scripts posted there the latest ones we are using in our standard workstation?
... - 08:42 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- > Another word you do not want to include @*.a@ files in @FWD@ project tree and link them as the @makefile@ change li...
- 08:21 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> Can these be found in the @LD_LIBRARY_PATH@? If so, we can augment that to point to our cust... - 08:13 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Don't we already require that @libncurses-dev@ is installed to compile? ([[p2j:Install NCURSES D... - 07:11 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Yes, we will move ahead with this approach now. Let's get the details figured out and you can implement the changes.
- 07:10 AM Support #5167 (WIP): using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- 07:10 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Don't we already require that @libncurses-dev@ is installed to compile? ([[p2j:Install NCURSES Development Headers]]...
- 09:38 PM Support #5167 (Feedback): using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncu...
- I made the compatibility testing for clean Ubuntu 22.04 system and statically linked patched ncurses calls from @libn...
05/01/2023
- 03:53 PM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please give this idea a try to see if it can work. You would patch a local version of the ncurse...
04/27/2023
- 11:45 AM Support #5167: using static linking to eliminate the need to patch the system-wide ncurses
- Please give this idea a try to see if it can work. You would patch a local version of the ncurses project and use it...
- 11:41 AM Bug #6208 (Closed): cleanup build warnings
Also available in: Atom