Activity
From 04/14/2025 to 05/13/2025
05/13/2025
- 06:29 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> > OK. So, processing each AST (or walk call graph) ... - 06:29 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Yes, but there is also the 2nd phase:...
- 06:18 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Octavian Adrian Gavril wrote:
> OK. So, processing each AST (or walk call graph) is the job that needs to be divided... - 06:04 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- OK. So, processing each AST (or walk call graph) is the job that needs to be divided between threads, right?...
- 05:57 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- > I understand that PatternEngine should be thread-safe, but where exactly should the thread work be split? Perhaps ...
05/12/2025
- 04:50 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. The core @PatternEngine@ itself (and all of its dependent code such as the @SymbolResolver@, X...
05/09/2025
- 03:41 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- I went through all the workers listed above and checked where the variables are good to store in the context-local. I...
05/08/2025
- 05:56 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- There is nothing intrinsically unsafe with static methods. Any state they access will need to be context local OR sy...
- 04:48 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- Should static methods be kept or make them non-static and use them through a class instance?
@DataModelWorker@:
<pr...
05/07/2025
- 08:37 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> If you look at @DataModelWorker@, you will see the static state is in a @WorkArea@ class... - 05:03 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- If you look at @DataModelWorker@, you will see the static state is in a @WorkArea@ class, to be context-local. This ...
- 03:20 AM Feature #1752: eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other dependen...
- Here is a full list with worker classes used in TRPL:
# @com.goldencode.p2j.schema.ImportWorker$SqlRecordLoader@
# ... - 01:51 AM Feature #1752 (WIP): eliminate statics/singleton patterns in all TRPL worker classes and other de...
- 08:32 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Greg, I can't find an exact task for this - I think the discussion was spread-out for runtime query conversion, incre...
05/06/2025
- 09:41 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- > Constantin: I know you started work on this some time ago. What task had those results and are there any other note...
- 09:40 AM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- There is an early version of a multi-threaded pattern engine rewrite in @com.goldencode.trpl.*@. It is fairly clean ...
05/05/2025
- 06:45 AM Feature #1745 (Hold): review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in...
- Yes, it is safe to pause.
- 03:28 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I made some additional changes that fixed the way @func-library@ children are processed. The main idea was to keep tr...
04/30/2025
- 10:04 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I've committed new changes to *1745a/15804* covering the following:
* Fixed the usage of @CallGraphWorker@;
* Fixed...
04/29/2025
- 01:51 PM Feature #3211: implement multi-threaded pattern engine and rework the ConversionDriver to leverag...
- Currently, TRPL runs in a single thread. It is well understood that enabling multi-threading would allow TRPL to lev...
- 01:46 PM Feature #1754 (Rejected): resolve any performance issues with new multi-threaded pattern engine i...
- 05:31 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I believe that generating/using @callgraph@ is necessary to make rules from @rules/reports@ and @rules/callgraph@ loa...
04/28/2025
- 10:27 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I've added a few changes that improve the results. These add the following fixes:
* avoided double logging of keywor...
04/25/2025
- 08:33 PM Feature #9942: syntax for tree structure defintion and usage as templates or for pattern matching
- We have a mechanism for implementing templates in TRPL v1, using the @TemplateWorker@ (TW). The idea is that the TW ...
04/24/2025
- 04:27 PM Feature #9942 (New): syntax for tree structure defintion and usage as templates or for pattern ma...
- 04:03 PM Feature #9941: natural/integrated scoping for resources
- Today we use the @DictionaryWorker@ to implement scoped dictionaries. This allows us to explicitly push/pop state ba...
- 03:35 PM Feature #9941 (New): natural/integrated scoping for resources
- 03:34 PM Feature #9940: array syntax for referencing parent, child or sibling nodes
- It is common to use chaining to reference parent nodes. Instead of @copy.parent.parent.parent@ or @copy.getAncestor(...
- 03:28 PM Feature #9940 (New): array syntax for referencing parent, child or sibling nodes
- 02:10 PM Feature #9938: property syntax for annotations
- Something else to mention: we allow @node.getAnnotation(someVar)@ (and put/is), especially from TRPL functions I thin...
- 02:09 PM Feature #9938: property syntax for annotations
- > for the @this.name@ syntax, the @name@ must not collide with a @Aast@ getter method (as we can do a @node.firstChil...
- 01:09 PM Feature #9938: property syntax for annotations
- Greg, a few caveats:
* for the @this.name@ syntax, the @name@ must not collide with a @Aast@ getter method (as we ca... - 01:04 PM Feature #9938: property syntax for annotations
- In TRPL 1.0, annotations are "second class" features. The syntax of the language itself does not provide any facilit...
- 11:51 AM Feature #9938 (New): property syntax for annotations
04/23/2025
- 09:31 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I've completed some rules testcases covering all the expression/token/tag rules I monitor. These are not loaded in *1...
04/14/2025
- 10:44 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- Is @AUTOMATIC NULL CHECKING@ really only used 5 times? That is suspicious.
- 10:25 AM Feature #1745: review, decide upon and document the 1.0 features which will be retained in 2.0
- I've committed some updates to *15800*, which include:
* Added compilation support for @<action>@ expressions. This ...
Also available in: Atom