Project

General

Profile

Feature #3047

JDBC jar deployment

Added by Eric Faulhaber almost 8 years ago. Updated over 7 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

billable:
No
vendor_id:
GCD

History

#1 Updated by Eric Faulhaber almost 8 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to Feature

From email


On 04/01/2016 10:14 AM, Paul wrote:

Hi,

I considered raising a redmine issue, but this is a little speculative.

I've been looking into use of SQL server again as I want to get it into our test pipeline. I've completed something to build the .NET assemblies and push them into our binary repo and I'm now thinking about deployment.

I have a few questions:

  1. Do you plan to include sqljdbc42.jar in p2j/lib?
  2. Should the manifest/p2jrt.mf be changed to remove postgresql-9.4.jar?
  3. Assuming the answer to 2 is "yes". How do you plan to handle the changes required to import.sh and various other scripts that contain classpaths? My current plan is to handle deployment of all such files using ruby erb templating, but I'm wondering what approach you'll be taking for the core product.

​Cheers,
Paul.​

Hi Paul,

  1. I would prefer to include the jar, in order to have a known version. However, we will have to review the license to see if we are allowed to distribute.
  2. Yes, good point.
  3. Honestly had not considered this yet. Since the import "script" is essentially a one-line (albeit long) command, the path of least resistance and likely the first pass for internal use will be the admittedly crude approach of separate scripts. We'll want to figure something better out for the long run.

Actually, I will open a Redmine issue for this.

Thanks,
Eric

#2 Updated by Greg Shah over 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from Deployment and Management Improvements to Deployment and Management Improvements

Also available in: Atom PDF