Bug #6400
ADD-SOURCE-BUFFER can have the fields qualified with the table name
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
100%
billable:
No
vendor_id:
GCD
case_num:
History
#2 Updated by Constantin Asofiei almost 2 years ago
- Subject changed from addSourceBuffer can have the fields qualified with the table name to ADD-SOURCE-BUFFER can have the fields qualified with the table name
I've seen in customer code a call like ADD-SOURCE-BUFFER(bufHandle, "tt1.f1,tt1.f2,tt1.f3"), i.e. the fields are qualified.
Currently I'm just extracting the fields (last token on dot separator) - Ovidiu, please take a look if there's more to it.
This is for branch 6129a.
#3 Updated by Ovidiu Maxiniuc almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to WIP
#4 Updated by Ovidiu Maxiniuc almost 2 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Status changed from WIP to Review
Fixed in r13879 of 6129a.
#5 Updated by Constantin Asofiei almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from Review to Test