Project

General

Profile

Bug #6809

find current ... exclusive-lock no-wait. not working

Added by Constantin Asofiei over 1 year ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
Test
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Eric Faulhaber
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

billable:
No
vendor_id:
GCD
case_num:

History

#2 Updated by Constantin Asofiei over 1 year ago

The recreate is this, using to FWD clients:
  • run first program b1.p - do not press any key:
    message "b1.p".

for each book:
   delete book.
end.

do transaction:
   create book.
   book.isbn = "Abc".
   release book.
end.

do transaction:
   find first book no-lock.

   if avail book then do:
      pause.
      find current book exclusive-lock no-wait no-error.
      if not locked(book) then message book.isbn.
      else message "locked".
   end.
end.
  • run second program b2.p - do not press any key:
    message "b2.p".

do transaction:
   find first book no-lock.

   if avail book then do:
      find current book exclusive-lock no-wait no-error.
      if not locked(book) then message book.isbn.
      else message "locked".
   end.
   pause.
end.
  • go to b1.p and press a key - the record will be released instead of reporting as 'locked' because is being locked by b2.p. This results in not locked being true and book buffer having no record, in b1.p.

#3 Updated by Constantin Asofiei over 1 year ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to High

This needs to be fixed in 6129a

#4 Updated by Eric Faulhaber over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to WIP
  • Assignee set to Eric Faulhaber

#5 Updated by Eric Faulhaber over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from WIP to Review
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Fixed in 6129a/14477. Constantin, please review and test with the original application, if you have a recreate beyond the test cases in #6809-2.

#6 Updated by Constantin Asofiei over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Review to Test

Eric Faulhaber wrote:

Fixed in 6129a/14477. Constantin, please review and test with the original application, if you have a recreate beyond the test cases in #6809-2.

I don't have a recreate in the original application. The changes look good.

Also available in: Atom PDF