FWD » Core Development » Base Language

09/08/2017

02:30 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

> Assume we a running the FWD client code on Linux/Solaris based OS. Because COM feature is working on Windows only -... Greg Shah

02:21 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Do you mean writing Win32 DLL that serves Java calls in #1634?
>
> No. I mean writing a CO... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:49 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

> Do you mean writing Win32 DLL that serves Java calls in #1634?
No. I mean writing a COM object that allows us ... Greg Shah

01:34 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: The following attempts to summarize our current status and give you guidance on the next... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:48 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

> It will be up to ComServer logic to choose respective handling for different objects.
If possible, it is best to... Greg Shah

08:08 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>... Probably you need to create two separate lists, one with top-level and one with lower le... Eugenie Lyzenko

04:22 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Sounds like a plan.
You need to query the OS or read from the registry the actual list of available @"String COM I... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:12 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

So far the generic plan to access COM Automation objects(without all required details for now):
1. Starting from s... Eugenie Lyzenko

09/07/2017

06:45 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

> 1. The COM object we need to integrate are COM Automation objects
Yes.
> and ActiveX controls. Correct?
N... Greg Shah

08:57 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Continue investigation the background theory. The questions at this time:
1. The COM object we need to integrate a... Eugenie Lyzenko

09/01/2017

09:02 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support

Eugenie: The following attempts to summarize our current status and give you guidance on the next steps.
When 1818... Greg Shah

08/17/2017

07:47 PM Feature #3285: add support for SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS and SESSION:STARTUP-PARAMETERS

Added conversion support and runtime stubs for SESSION:STARTUP-PARAMETERS and SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS to task branc... Hynek Cihlar

05:40 PM Feature #3285: add support for SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS and SESSION:STARTUP-PARAMETERS

Greg Shah wrote:
> What branch is this code in?
>
> What is the status?
AFAIK there are no code changes yet.
Hynek Cihlar

05:39 PM Feature #3285 (WIP): add support for SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS and SESSION:STARTUP-PARAMETERS

Hynek Cihlar

08/15/2017

04:29 PM Feature #3292: i18n improvements

> > From what I see, branch 3292a has been rebased from trunk 11157, but otherwise is not changed from my previous co... Greg Shah

10:25 AM Feature #3292: i18n improvements

Greg Shah wrote:
> From what I see, branch 3292a has been rebased from trunk 11157, but otherwise is not changed fro... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:11 AM Feature #3292: i18n improvements

From what I see, branch 3292a has been rebased from trunk 11157, but otherwise is not changed from my previous code r... Greg Shah

08/14/2017

01:05 PM Feature #3285: add support for SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS and SESSION:STARTUP-PARAMETERS

What branch is this code in?
What is the status? Greg Shah

12:23 PM Feature #3326: implement the equivalent to the .NET Open Client

The idea is to use the FWD Appserver support for which we have a Java client (#1608). It is similar in concept and f... Greg Shah

12:18 PM Feature #3326 (New): implement the equivalent to the .NET Open Client

Greg Shah