Activity
From 11/02/2017 to 12/01/2017
12/01/2017
- 10:47 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11248@.
Adding protection for null characters passed ... - 10:45 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- During testing COM feature with big application found new issues:
1. The file resources to be taken from application... - 10:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > Is it OK to leave this feature postponed?
Yes, you can match the support level of the Java code. - 09:50 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11247@.
OK. This update returns native code to the st... - 07:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > So for now you offer to have nothing extent array support.
> Yes, because the correct... - 08:21 AM Bug #3400: shared variables context for RUN int-proc IN ext-proc-handle is not properly pushed
- The main problems I identified are:
# a shared-var leak for persistent procedures (they are not being removed when t... - 08:19 AM Bug #3400 (Closed): shared variables context for RUN int-proc IN ext-proc-handle is not properly ...
11/30/2017
- 05:53 PM Feature #3396: shift searchpath and other pathing lists in the directory to use the platform neut...
- I almost completely forgot about #3225. I took a quick look over it. The 3225b contains only a single altered file: @...
- 04:51 PM Feature #3396: shift searchpath and other pathing lists in the directory to use the platform neut...
- The @searchpath@ is the @directory.xml@ value that is used by the FWD runtime to represent the @PROPATH@. Since FWD ...
- 05:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Guys,
More complex approach can be to introduce new class for results coming from native side to Java, say @ComRet... - 04:55 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Another word as I can see you removed (undone) all recent changes prepared to handle extent... - 04:50 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, please see 3262b rev 11246. Note that you will need to have some changes in th... - 04:15 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, please see 3262b rev 11246. Note that you will need to have some changes in the FWD native COM part, becaus...
- 01:01 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Yes. I didn't start yet to fix the branch, I'll try tonight or tomorrow the latest.
- 12:57 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Yes, we have signature match issue. Like this when @FWD@ expects @comhandle.call()@ returning @BDT@ while our @comhan...
- 11:53 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11244
>
> I've checked in some changes as 11245. I'm g... - 11:00 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11244
I've checked in some changes as 11245. I'm good with that version. ... - 09:28 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11244@.
The notes resolution changes. Optional @NO-CO... - 08:47 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11243
>
> 1. Please make the 4th parameter to @launch()... - 06:07 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11243
1. Please make the 4th parameter to @launch()@ optional. This means ... - 10:42 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11243@.
This is minor javadoc fixes for my recent cha... - 09:47 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with recent trunk @11208@, new version is @11242@.
- 09:27 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11241@.
This update fixes the handling of the @NO-WAI...
11/29/2017
- 05:15 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > Is this OK?
Yes.
> Observing the rule file for process launch I see we do not have any support for NO-CONSOLE... - 02:58 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- For Windows @SILENT@ option I suggest to change the @ProcessDaemon@ class to take into account the same reaction for ...
- 11:19 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > For example notepad.exe and regedit.exe cause the 4GL application to finish external app to continue after os-comm...
- 11:15 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, I've tried this simple program, with @pro@, @prowin@ and from procedure editor,... - 11:12 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Yes, @notepad.exe@, @regedit.exe@, also @write.exe@ can be started with @no-console@ option. However the behavior is ...
- 11:05 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you testing with OpenEdge 11.6?
@11.6.3@. - 10:28 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, I've tried this simple program, with @pro@, @prowin@ and from procedure editor, and it opens the @notepad.ex...
- 10:27 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Try running a program that has no GUI and which also can be made to run without STDIN/STDOUT/STDE... - 08:59 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Try running a program that has no GUI and which also can be made to run without STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR. In other words,...
- 08:24 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Are you testing with OpenEdge 11.6?
- 08:11 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @dir@ is an internal feature of the @cmd.exe@ shell. It won't work without the shell. But launc... - 07:43 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- @dir@ is an internal feature of the @cmd.exe@ shell. It won't work without the shell. But launching a @.exe@ progra...
- 07:39 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I will review the changes shortly.
>
> > NO-CONSOLE - does not start any child process in GUI.... - 06:02 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- I will review the changes shortly.
> NO-CONSOLE - does not start any child process in GUI.
I don't understand w... - 09:22 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11240@.
The change adds initial step to turn the chil...
11/28/2017
- 06:51 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1705@.
The child process starting testcases added for @GUI@ mode ... - 05:59 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> Please check the @NO-WAIT@, @SILENT@ and @NO-CONSOLE@ options. I suspect the @NO-WAIT@ is pr... - 03:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11207@, new revision is @11239@.
- 03:47 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Starting the rebase.
- 03:45 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg/Eugenie: I plan to make the Java code in 3262b generic enough so that we will be ab... - 03:44 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > >Eugenie: Would you please run some testcases to see how the interactive child process launching works under GUI? I...
- 03:42 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg/Eugenie: I plan to make the Java code in 3262b generic enough so that we will be able to add the missing extent ...
- 03:32 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Planning to rebase the branch with the recent trunk in a 10 min. if nobody objects.
- 03:27 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
>Eugenie: Would you please run some testcases to see how the interactive child process launching wo... - 03:19 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> >... - 03:17 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > >Eugenie: the large GUI app w... - 03:06 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11234
> ...
>4. The changes in comauto_win.c are so exte... - 02:42 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11238@.
Undo the @EnvironmentOps@ change that fixes t... - 02:29 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> >Eugenie: the large GUI app we are using has constructs like S... - 02:27 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>Eugenie: the large GUI app we are using has constructs like STRING(com-var:property) - th... - 02:25 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > It seems we should just continue the work in this branch to finish... - 02:24 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > The FWD executes ProcessDaemon.launch() for START EXCEL.EXE some_file.csv. This causes the ChildProcessFactory.getC...
- 02:16 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11234
> >
> >1. In assignme... - 02:15 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It seems we should just continue the work in this branch to finish the extent support, rather tha... - 02:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11234
>
>1. In assignments.rules, the newly added code ... - 02:13 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- It seems we should just continue the work in this branch to finish the extent support, rather than reverting it all.
- 02:00 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Do you have any concerns about the changes in this branch?
I've fixed some cases (re... - 01:58 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11234
>
> 3. The @EnvironmentOps@ change is not correct... - 01:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > found the cases that use COM prefixed with starting EXCEL.EXE as subprocess which is currently ... - 12:26 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin: Do you have any concerns about the changes in this branch?
- 12:25 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > found the cases that use COM prefixed with starting EXCEL.EXE as subprocess which is currently not supported in FWD...
- 12:23 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Code Review Task Branch 3262b Revision 11234
1. In @assignments.rules@, the newly added code is disabled because o... - 12:13 PM Feature #3396 (WIP): shift searchpath and other pathing lists in the directory to use the platfor...
11/27/2017
- 06:15 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11233@, rebased with recent trunk, new version is @11234...
11/26/2017
- 04:54 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11232@.
Added fix for @propath@ variation. Allows hav... - 08:09 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11231@.
Fix for regression caused by shifting from si...
11/25/2017
- 05:06 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11205@, new revision is @11230@.
11/24/2017
- 03:39 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11204@, new revision is @11229@.
- 02:20 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11226@, @11227@.
This update implements improved obje... - 06:45 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > Looks like we also need to change gap report processing rules to reflect the added implementation, this is one more...
- 10:45 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- OK. Looks like the @4GL@ @COM@ garbage collector approach has been clarified. The internal object taken from given @C...
- 09:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The COM objects has no actual parent-child relationships. The same object can be obtained for r... - 07:05 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg,
Looks like we also need to change gap report processing rules to reflect the added implementation, this is o...
11/23/2017
- 06:42 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11225@.
This update adds extent array support for pro... - 06:25 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > The COM objects has no actual parent-child relationships. The same object can be obtained for re-use from different...
- 09:42 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11224@.
This is minor cleanup update. I have designed...
11/22/2017
- 04:36 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
>Eugenie: Can you write the Java-side array changes that are needed? Constantin is busy with anothe... - 03:50 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie: Can you write the Java-side array changes that are needed? Constantin is busy with another task.
What el... - 02:17 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11202@, new revision is @11223@.
- 02:00 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11222@.
This is code partial cleanup and adding inter... - 08:05 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If I understand correctly, they are stating that the user is responsible for releasing all of the... - 06:05 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > The intermediate COM handles created with lines like comObject:prop1:prop2:(prop|method()) is not explicitly releas...
11/21/2017
- 06:33 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11221@.
This updates has changes to make chain calls ... - 06:07 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Honestly I do not understand why we need attributes support ... - 05:37 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Honestly I do not understand why we need attributes support for @COM-HANDLE@. @COM-HANDLE@ ... - 05:32 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- I would suggest to change @com_access.rules@ to:...
- 04:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The @NAME@ is a reserved keyword? What makes @NAME@ property... - 02:57 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The @NAME@ is a reserved keyword? What makes @NAME@ property to process differently?
Is a ... - 02:55 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > 2. Consider the following @4GL@ code:
> > [...]
> >
> > ... - 02:13 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> This is correct conversion and we have property getter and method call. Both of them return... - 01:54 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I have two notes at this time for Java side... - 01:20 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have two notes at this time for Java side with real @Excel@ application:
> ... - 01:16 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Guys,
I have two notes at this time for Java side with real @Excel@ application:
1. The @NativeComObject@ must ... - 09:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1700@.
The real @MS Office@ testcases have been added. The curren...
11/18/2017
- 06:20 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, see 11220 - it should work, I'm sending null value for empty parameters.
Yes... - 05:47 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, see 11220 - it should work, I'm sending null value for empty parameters.
- 04:39 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, I missed this part - how do you want it to work? Just set that value to @null@, and... - 04:29 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin,
>
> The current Java side support for optional parameters is incomplete. The... - 12:01 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin,
The current Java side support for optional parameters is incomplete. The using @comhandle.EMPTY(new Ob... - 06:44 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11219@.
The update adds native support for optional p... - 08:02 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1699@.
The read-only property test has been added. With respectiv...
11/17/2017
- 06:52 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The required change to support optional parameters for method call has been prepared for native code. The idea is bas...
- 12:24 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Rebased with recent trunk, new revision is @11217@.
Some implementation details. Property set for indexed case is ... - 12:04 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11216@.
This adds support for indexed properties hand...
11/16/2017
- 12:21 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> Eugenie: looks like 4GL allows a construct like @comVar:comProperty(1,2,3) = someVal... - 11:07 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The parse, conversion and Java ComOleHelper API changes are in 3262b rev 11215.
Eugenie: looks like 4GL allows a c... - 09:21 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > What I suggest is to separate at least the indexed property usage in fwdAppl:int1DIndexedProperty(3) = intVar1. fro...
- 09:16 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > ComParamter.EMPTY
I like this. - 09:09 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1698@.
Added testcases to verify indexed property feature and obj... - 07:34 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, for the third case in your example: that one needs to be disambiguated by the F...
11/15/2017
- 06:07 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>...
> I think we can check this if COM_METHOD is first child of a KW_ASSIGN. How is the... - 05:22 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, for the third case in your example: that one needs to be disambiguated by the FWD native side - i.e. check i...
- 05:21 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > I'm debugging the @4GL@ @COM@ automation indexed properties. There are a some issues while converting this feature....
- 05:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Guys,
I'm debugging the @4GL@ @COM@ automation indexed properties. There are a some issues while converting this f... - 04:58 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think we need to change method call processing on conversion level to have converted code lik... - 09:10 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > I think we need to change method call processing on conversion level to have converted code like this:
>
>> call(... - 08:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1697@.
Added testcases to verify @CREATE ...@, @CREATE ... CONNEC... - 07:44 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The investigation and debugging results for today.
1. The large application has object creation modes: @CREATE "Co...
11/14/2017
- 07:30 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1696@.
Added tests to verify optional parameter mode for method c... - 07:18 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11212@. Rebased with recent trunk, new revision is @1121...
11/13/2017
- 06:37 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Other findings for today:
1. The option @BY-VARIANT-POINTER@ is never used in our large @4GL@ code.
2. The option... - 06:16 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin, Greg,
I'm debugging different data input modes for COM object method call and found one issue to discu...
11/12/2017
- 11:10 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11199@, new revision is @11211@.
11/11/2017
- 08:03 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11210@.
The update adds support for @OUTPUT@ and @INP...
11/10/2017
- 06:00 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin,
> >
> > Some consideration about usage @BY-PO... - 05:39 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > BTW, if BY-POINTER is used for INPUT, I assume the variable on that argument will be changed?
Actually, I think... - 05:27 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin,
>
> Some consideration about usage @BY-POINTER@ and @INPUT-OUTPUT@ or @OUTPU... - 05:07 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin,
Some consideration about usage @BY-POINTER@ and @INPUT-OUTPUT@ or @OUTPUT@ data modifiers. The usage @... - 09:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1693@, @1694@.
This adds testcase to check different modes includ... - 02:17 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav:
Please write up the documentation for this feature. It should be placed in:
[[p2j:JasperReports Int...
11/09/2017
- 06:35 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11198@, new revision is @11209@.
- 06:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11208@.
Small improvement to unify the common code in... - 10:42 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, can you check if 4GL allows something like this, @i = i + comVar:extentProp[1]@... - 07:46 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, can you check if 4GL allows something like this, @i = i + comVar:extentProp[1]@ ? Currently FWD can't conve...
- 07:06 AM Feature #3342 (Closed): implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from...
- 06:50 AM Feature #3342 (Review): implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from...
- 06:49 AM Feature #3342 (WIP): implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4G...
- 3342с has been merged into the trunk as bzr revision 11198.
- 06:25 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Code Review Task Branch 3342c Revision 11200
I'm good with the code.
Please merge to trunk. - 06:15 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Please take a look at 3342c rev 11200 and I'll merge to trunk.
11/08/2017
- 06:59 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11197@, new revision is @11207@.
- 06:43 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11206@.
This is the COM method return value fix to re... - 01:39 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The bzr repo updated to revision @1691@.
This adds the testcase to check the method accepting 3 input parameters a... - 12:06 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11205@.
Finished adding @COM->Java@ transformation fo... - 06:38 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Code Review Task Branch 3342c Revision 11199
I really like it.
The only request: the @getFileFromClient()@ sh... - 05:32 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Rebased task branch 3342c from P2J trunk revision 11197. Please review.
11/07/2017
- 06:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11204@.
This is extent support adding for native modu... - 02:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The idea is to hide the logic in some code that is specific to COM Automation. I don't want to p... - 12:17 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > This is small update:
> >
> > The single not array return... - 12:12 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Can we hide this inside the runtime? For example, instead of this:...
- 11:50 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> This is small update:
>
> The single not array return value will be just a @1@ item size... - 11:36 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- This is small update:
The single not array return value will be just a @1@ item size array case.
- 11:34 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin,
I'm implementing native support for extent based array. And looks like I need you to make some changes... - 09:35 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I appreciate the idea. But since COM Automation is platform specific and hard coded to Windows, ...
11/06/2017
- 06:50 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- I appreciate the idea. But since COM Automation is platform specific and hard coded to Windows, it is not a feature ...
- 06:29 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, what do you think? Do we need this feature to be tried to implement in our FWD native COM... - 06:25 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > Greg, what do you think? Do we need this feature to be tried to implement in our FWD native COM automation support?...
- 06:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Some additional consideration for @MEMPTR@. Technically I think we can implement support for this data type in our @F...
- 04:08 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11196@, new revision is @11203@.
- 03:51 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11202@.
The update has full support for @RAW@ data ty... - 03:07 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The bzr repo updated to revision @1688@.
Added the @RAW@ and @MEMPTR@ data type tests. Conclusion - the @4GL@ does... - 01:50 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- I suppose that @MultiClassLoader@ can get resource from any jar (see @MultiClassLoader.findResource@). Is there any d...
11/04/2017
- 10:09 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- > but Java doesn't compile as "y is not effectively final". I can promote this to instance field... but although this...
- 09:20 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin,
Please update class source files header for your @comauto@ modifications revision @11200@.
Greg, Co... - 08:10 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been rebased with trunk @11195@, new revision is @11201@.
11/03/2017
- 07:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Task branch @3262b@ has been updated for review to revision @11199@.
This is the fixes for @date/datetime/datetime... - 06:11 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, 3262b rev 11198 contains the first pass at extent support from Java side.
Ar... - 05:47 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, 3262b rev 11198 contains the first pass at extent support from Java side. Some other questions:
* can a CO... - 05:38 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Greg, I need an advice. 4GL allows a construct like this at parse time:...
- 01:14 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> >Where it gets complicated is the OUTPUT/INPUT-OUTPUT paramete... - 12:03 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- More checks shows the additional issue with @date/datetime/datetime-tz@ data type support. We loose precision passing...
- 11:57 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>Where it gets complicated is the OUTPUT/INPUT-OUTPUT parameters: ComOleHelper.call needs ... - 10:04 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin,
>
> As you know we need to add support for arrays produced from 4GL extent o... - 08:57 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin,
As you know we need to add support for arrays produced from 4GL extent option. My plan is following:
... - 11:03 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- You can also look at @LogicalTerminal.setImage()@ to see how it is a 2 level search.
- 10:56 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Eugenie wrote image loading code that first checks the application's jar and then search... - 09:35 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > Eugenie wrote image loading code that first checks the application's jar and then searches the propath on the clien...
11/02/2017
- 04:37 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- 3262b rev 11197 contains the changes to make the @comhandle@ id unique for FWD's COM object representation and not re...
- 02:52 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- The cleanup for @comhandle@ has been uploaded as rev @11196@.
- 02:29 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Eugenie, I've looked at 326... - 02:03 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Incorrect screen, both numbers are different but must be the same and both numbers are too ... - 01:54 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>Can the com-handle variable be used with HANDLE function?
No, incompatible data type.
... - 12:58 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eugenie, I've looked at 3262b rev 11195 and I have these com... - 12:56 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Eugenie, I've looked at 3262b rev 11195 and I have these com... - 12:46 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, I've looked at 3262b rev 11195 and I have these comments for the Java changes:
... - 12:39 PM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, I've looked at 3262b rev 11195 and I have these comments for the Java changes:
... - 11:25 AM Feature #3262: implement COM/OLE Automation support
- Eugenie, I've looked at 3262b rev 11195 and I have these comments for the Java changes:
* @NativeComObject@ - the @i... - 04:27 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > The generated report doesn't necessarily has to keep the name on different executions (an example are reports ran f...
- 04:11 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > If I understand correctly, the use of @jasperContext.setFileResolver(fileName -> new File(ReportFactory.getFilePath...
- 04:05 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- If I understand correctly, the use of @jasperContext.setFileResolver(fileName -> new File(ReportFactory.getFilePath(f...
- 04:02 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > In this case, compiling the .jrxml will be done 'on-the-fly', don't know how easy is to ... - 04:00 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Something else: someone can design a report which refers to a client-side resource (i.e.... - 03:51 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > In this case, compiling the .jrxml will be done 'on-the-fly', don't know how easy is to cache it (especially build ...
- 03:46 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > Something else: someone can design a report which refers to a client-side resource (i.e. an image local to the clie...
- 03:08 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- And also add the @reporting.Report@ interface to the @HandleCommon@ interface; any extension resource in FWD must be ...
- 03:07 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Or do you want the 4GL business logic to design the report from scratch, too, and compil... - 03:01 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > Isn't compiling the @jasper@ file done only once, after the design is complete?
Right. If we are going to put ... - 02:27 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Compiling reports is a big performance hit.
Isn't compiling the @jasper@ file done only o... - 02:20 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > If you feel that the client-side support doesn't provide the same capability, then it is OK to do a 3 level process...
- 01:43 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > Yes, but I have to note that having files outside of jar is very convenient at report development stage.
If you ... - 01:40 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > we can search in the server's jars first and, if not found, search it on the client-side
OK, I'll go this way. S... - 01:27 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > From (unmodified) converted code there is no way to write or read from the server filesy... - 01:21 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > From (unmodified) converted code there is no way to write or read from the server filesystem. That means that the ...
- 12:49 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > Do you want me to remove capability to read non-in-jar files or limit access to the reports directory only?
From... - 12:26 PM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > 1. We do expect that application-specific resources would come from the application's jar file. This would be on t...
- 09:54 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > But unfortunately the current directory is the P2J server directory.
Sorry, I completely missed the part about f... - 08:29 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- > One question: why not default the reports directory to "." instead of "reports"?
On my taste the best place for ... - 06:11 AM Feature #3342: implement a facility to easily run a JasperReports report definition from 4GL code...
- Code Review Task Branch 3342c Revision 11194
I'm fine with the changes.
One question: why not default the repor... - 05:58 AM Feature #3343 (Closed): implement a 4GL syntax extension and the runtime backing to send emails (...
- The documentation for this functionality can be found in "Email Send":https://proj.goldencode.com/projects/p2j/wiki/E...
Also available in: Atom