Activity
From 01/30/2015 to 02/28/2015
02/27/2015
- 08:37 AM Bug #2526: Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
- As for initial analysis: currently we use record snapshots as the base to find the next record in the index using an ...
- 08:28 AM Bug #2526: Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
- This problem was noticed in an editable browse which easily exposes this bug. Assigning a value to a field of the ind...
- 08:17 AM Bug #2526 (New): Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
02/26/2015
- 12:49 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- I found a test case that fails to convert properly....
02/25/2015
- 03:53 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- The reference pdf states that the SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER is the head of the linked list of _"handles for the dynamic bu...
02/24/2015
- 03:14 PM Bug #2524 (WIP): missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- 03:11 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- I noticed the following message printed in the app-server 'client' log after each executed request....
- 02:44 PM Bug #2524 (Closed): missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
02/19/2015
- 03:04 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The generated code is unchanged for majic. The attached update passed the conversion test.
... - 12:01 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The generated code is unchanged for majic. The attached update passed the conversion test.
- 09:44 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Where did the need to improve the predicate prep come from? What is the rationale behind the...
02/18/2015
- 03:40 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0218a:
Where did the need to improve the predicate prep come from? What is the rationale behind the cu... - 02:40 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Added support for @LogicalExpression@ anon c'tor.
Refactored some method names to better fit their implementation. - 02:41 PM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- This update should fix the return values for respective methods.
02/17/2015
- 03:34 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Oops, I forgot the update. here it is.
- 03:33 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Changes since 0210a:
* Improved @preparePredicate()@ for OPEN QUERY predicates to
- allow one level nested quotes
- a... - 10:21 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0210a:
The version of @DynamicQueryHelper@ in the update shows no difference from the latest version i...
02/13/2015
- 02:32 PM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- Alternative working form for ...
- 07:46 AM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- The set of get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods should return:
* @?@ (unknown) if the query object handle is invali... - 07:38 AM Bug #2514 (Closed): incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
02/11/2015
- 06:56 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The problem reported in note-62 is fixed by adding the @methods_attributes.rules@ to runtime conversion. With this oc...
02/10/2015
- 02:41 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The attached update should handle the @WhereExpressions@.
There are a few other issues that must be solved first:
*... - 02:07 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> At a glance, yes, that looks wrong. Have you converted the static form of the same query? Thi... - 01:57 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- At a glance, yes, that looks wrong. Have you converted the static form of the same query? This will tell you if the p...
- 01:52 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric,
I almost finished implementing support for 'extending' and interpreting the client-side @WhereExpression@ but ...
02/09/2015
- 02:16 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If we cannot come up with a single test case which would result in client-side where clause ... - 01:25 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- IIRC the point is that there can be multiple dynamic buffers with the same name in the same scope and some P2J struct...
- 01:13 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, are you basically asking why suffixes are added to the names of dynamic buffers?
Ye... - 01:08 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric, are you basically asking why suffixes are added to the names of dynamic buffers?
- 12:17 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Stanislav, I don't fully understand the following comment, from @DynamicQueryHelper@:763:...
- 10:36 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- If we cannot come up with a single test case which would result in client-side where clause processing (all so far se...
- 09:24 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Regarding the user-defined functions. I was thinking too ahead. At this moment the @ProgressParser@ cannot handle UDF...
- 08:25 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The result of this evaluation would be fed into an adapter subclass of the @WhereExpression@... - 04:15 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric,
I tried such constructs on windev01.
*CAN-FIND*: P2J parses and successfully converts them in java code, ...
02/07/2015
- 11:38 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Each OPEN QUERY in the following test case (@client-where-simple.p@) will force client-side where clause processing:
... - 07:03 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The regression test was successful. Please commit and distribute the update.
02/06/2015
- 04:15 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The conversion test was successful. There are no differences in the generated code with the attached update.
- 02:07 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- > The best alternative is to use your solution from note 43 and rename the new method to @putAnnotationObject()@ so t...
- 02:00 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric,
The last updates fail to convert the majic sources. The reason is the @putAnnotation()@ method. Although I use... - 12:38 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Thanks, Ovidiu. Please post your conversion results when that's done. I'll run my tests later today or overnight.
- 07:31 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- > * Why did you indent build.xml:265?
There were some TABs characters in that file that I replaced with plain spaces... - 11:03 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0205a:
* Please put back the indent at @DynamicQueryHelper@:101.
* I think the logging levels used in...
02/05/2015
- 03:05 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Before I write up the code review, I need a definitive answer on the client-side where claus... - 01:01 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Before I write up the code review, I need a definitive answer on the client-side where clause processing question in ...
- 11:16 AM Feature #2134: configurable denormalization of extent fields into individual fields in schema con...
- Update that excludes temporary table fields from denormalization process. Committed to bzr revision 10743.
Also available in: Atom