Activity
From 02/09/2015 to 03/10/2015
03/10/2015
- 03:28 PM Bug #2535: enhancing datatype conversion functions
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I guess we should keep the new constructor and replace the return line like:
> ... - 02:53 PM Bug #2535: enhancing datatype conversion functions
- The generated @evaluate@ method for @WhereExpression@ @whereExpr0@ looks currently like this:...
- 02:39 PM Bug #2535: enhancing datatype conversion functions
- You are right: we don't want to mask this error always, because there may be times when it represents a legitimate er...
- 01:35 PM Bug #2535: enhancing datatype conversion functions
- Eric,
I have an issue regarding the implementation of these methods. At first I implemented as simple as this:
<... - 11:57 AM Bug #2535: enhancing datatype conversion functions
- I just discovered that we don't cover all the conversions between datatypes. We need to implement additional construc...
- 11:34 AM Bug #2535 (Closed): enhancing datatype conversion functions
03/06/2015
- 05:56 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0306a:
Looks good. I'll run tests with this update and let you know how it goes. - 01:31 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The strings literals are generated as ready-to-be-written to java source files and the escape sequences must be proce...
03/04/2015
- 06:45 AM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Ovidiu, about HandleChain changes: the buffer-specific code ... - 05:43 AM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, about HandleChain changes: the buffer-specific code I think should reside in ove... - 05:37 AM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- Ovidiu, about HandleChain changes: the buffer-specific code I think should reside in overridden methods in the Buffer...
- 05:17 AM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu: please rename the testcase to something more descriptive (you can keep "2524" as par...
03/03/2015
- 05:28 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- One more thing: please make the @BufferImpl@ constructor you added @protected@ instead of @public@. As an implementat...
- 03:29 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- Code review 0303c:
You added a call to @release()@ at @TemporaryBuffer@:3411, which seems unrelated to the remaini... - 12:26 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- The attached update fixes the management of dynamic buffer handles.
- 11:55 AM Bug #2533 (WIP): management of dynamic buffer handles
02/27/2015
- 08:37 AM Bug #2526: Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
- As for initial analysis: currently we use record snapshots as the base to find the next record in the index using an ...
- 08:28 AM Bug #2526: Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
- This problem was noticed in an editable browse which easily exposes this bug. Assigning a value to a field of the ind...
- 08:17 AM Bug #2526 (New): Records preserving its position in the sorting index for adaptive query
02/26/2015
- 12:49 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- I found a test case that fails to convert properly....
02/25/2015
- 03:53 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- The reference pdf states that the SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER is the head of the linked list of _"handles for the dynamic bu...
02/24/2015
- 03:14 PM Bug #2524 (WIP): missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- 03:11 PM Bug #2524: missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
- I noticed the following message printed in the app-server 'client' log after each executed request....
- 02:44 PM Bug #2524 (Closed): missing support for NEXT-SIBLING attribute for buffer handles
02/19/2015
- 03:04 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The generated code is unchanged for majic. The attached update passed the conversion test.
... - 12:01 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The generated code is unchanged for majic. The attached update passed the conversion test.
- 09:44 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Where did the need to improve the predicate prep come from? What is the rationale behind the...
02/18/2015
- 03:40 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0218a:
Where did the need to improve the predicate prep come from? What is the rationale behind the cu... - 02:40 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Added support for @LogicalExpression@ anon c'tor.
Refactored some method names to better fit their implementation. - 02:41 PM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- This update should fix the return values for respective methods.
02/17/2015
- 03:34 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Oops, I forgot the update. here it is.
- 03:33 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Changes since 0210a:
* Improved @preparePredicate()@ for OPEN QUERY predicates to
- allow one level nested quotes
- a... - 10:21 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Code review 0210a:
The version of @DynamicQueryHelper@ in the update shows no difference from the latest version i...
02/13/2015
- 02:32 PM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- Alternative working form for ...
- 07:46 AM Bug #2514: incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
- The set of get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods should return:
* @?@ (unknown) if the query object handle is invali... - 07:38 AM Bug #2514 (Closed): incorrect return values for get{First|Next|Last|Previous} methods
02/11/2015
- 06:56 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The problem reported in note-62 is fixed by adding the @methods_attributes.rules@ to runtime conversion. With this oc...
02/10/2015
- 02:41 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- The attached update should handle the @WhereExpressions@.
There are a few other issues that must be solved first:
*... - 02:07 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> At a glance, yes, that looks wrong. Have you converted the static form of the same query? Thi... - 01:57 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- At a glance, yes, that looks wrong. Have you converted the static form of the same query? This will tell you if the p...
- 01:52 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric,
I almost finished implementing support for 'extending' and interpreting the client-side @WhereExpression@ but ...
02/09/2015
- 02:16 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If we cannot come up with a single test case which would result in client-side where clause ... - 01:25 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- IIRC the point is that there can be multiple dynamic buffers with the same name in the same scope and some P2J struct...
- 01:13 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Eric, are you basically asking why suffixes are added to the names of dynamic buffers?
Ye... - 01:08 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric, are you basically asking why suffixes are added to the names of dynamic buffers?
- 12:17 PM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Stanislav, I don't fully understand the following comment, from @DynamicQueryHelper@:763:...
- 10:36 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- If we cannot come up with a single test case which would result in client-side where clause processing (all so far se...
- 09:24 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Regarding the user-defined functions. I was thinking too ahead. At this moment the @ProgressParser@ cannot handle UDF...
- 08:25 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The result of this evaluation would be fed into an adapter subclass of the @WhereExpression@... - 04:15 AM Bug #2488: replace runtime compilation of dynamic queries
- Eric,
I tried such constructs on windev01.
*CAN-FIND*: P2J parses and successfully converts them in java code, ...
Also available in: Atom