Activity
From 12/23/2015 to 01/21/2016
01/19/2016
- 08:00 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Please go ahead with your proposed approach.
01/15/2016
- 07:55 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- > That sounds OK. Your first example suggests that this would have to be a deep copy of the original record (slower) ...
01/13/2016
- 04:23 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- That sounds OK. Your first example suggests that this would have to be a deep copy of the original record (slower) to...
- 03:22 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- > Do you mean @RecordBuffer.snapshot@?
Yes.
> > I think we should persist the original image of the last record in ... - 01:32 PM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> There are @RecordBuffer.referenceRecord@
Do you mean @RecordBuffer.snapshot@?
> ...and @... - 06:01 AM Bug #2955: Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
- This task was created as the old issue - P2J is sensitive to the content of a buffer participating in the adaptive qu...
- 04:59 AM Bug #2955 (WIP): Update records participating in a scrolling adaptive query.
01/06/2016
- 01:48 PM Bug #2946: SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
- From #2795-47
> 2795a rev 10981 looks like is working OK with the permanent buffers, too - see @testcases/uast/pro... - 10:45 AM Bug #2946: SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
- The following problem was found by Constantin in #2795-46.
There is an issue related to the buffer order reported ... - 10:43 AM Bug #2946 (New): SESSION:FIRST-BUFFER buffer order is wrong
12/29/2015
- 04:43 AM Feature #2581: improve performance of non-preselect, multi-table joins
- Eric, re: note 16:
The last time our overnight pipeline ran the @entitySEARCHTestCases/RELATIONSHIP/PROPERTY.xml@ ...
12/27/2015
- 08:33 PM Feature #2581: improve performance of non-preselect, multi-table joins
- Paul Eames wrote:
> [...]
> What I've done is start the P2J server with collection-statistics enabled and ran one t...
12/23/2015
- 09:32 AM Feature #2581: improve performance of non-preselect, multi-table joins
- To complete the picture, it probably would be useful to perform CPU sampling on the server (and perhaps on the client...
- 05:41 AM Feature #2581: improve performance of non-preselect, multi-table joins
- Using @pg_stat_statements@ to gather similar data in the DB gives similar results (unsurprisingly).
It's probably ...
Also available in: Atom