Activity
From 06/07/2017 to 07/06/2017
07/07/2017
- 08:57 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11171@.
This is the partial notes resolution. Add...
07/06/2017
- 06:19 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > >Also, all rendering should be done... - 04:54 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> >Also, all rendering should be done in DRAG, using overlaid XOR o... - 03:05 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of 1834a/11169.
> # in @PaneConfig@: do we need to keep both @gridUnitHeightChars@ ... - 02:53 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>Also, all rendering should be done in DRAG, using overlaid XOR operation, twice: once using ... - 01:45 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Review of 1834a/11169.
Nice job! Please see my observation below:
# in the default @BrowseInterface.setRowResizable... - 11:55 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11170@.
Small update to handle default setting fo... - 10:47 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11169@.
This update adds support for frame grid d... - 05:25 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Something else bothers me: since r11153 (or so) when running with Win10/win8 themes, the cl... - 04:44 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I finished running @uast/rectangle/*@ tests. I noted two issues:
# tests 6(1): the gap between the two rectangles is... - 09:40 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> # the background colour of frames is rendered by @BorderedPanelGuiImpl@, see lines 233-251.... - 08:00 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, indeed, there are a couple of issues regarding to frames, but they are not strictl... - 07:25 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, indeed, there are a couple of issues regarding to frames, but they are not strictly related to styles:
# no...
07/05/2017
- 05:43 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Please let me know if you agree to the changes I committed to new branch 2676b (rev 11156).... - 05:03 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, you were right, in some cases the line was not correctly drawn on Win8/10. I creat... - 03:56 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, you were right, in some cases the line was not correctly drawn on Win8/10. I created a complex testcase (see...
07/04/2017
- 06:25 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Interesting enough, if SCREEN-VALUE was updated in ROW-DISPLAY trigger during search by key, the new value is used fo...
- 03:55 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, please provide the exact 4GL code for this, I will run it on Win8.1 machine and co... - 03:49 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, please provide the exact 4GL code for this, I will run it on Win8.1 machine and continue investigations.
Th... - 03:44 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I agree, the buttons and other widgets look differently in Windows10 theme. But I do not think the GUI rectangle shou...
- 01:20 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- 2676a was merged to trunk as revision 11155. Test results and the branch itself were archived. Notification email was...
- 08:59 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu, I'm OK with merging 2676a to trunk - no further testing is needed, as it doesn't collide with 11154 trunk.
- 03:50 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been rebased with current trunk @11155@, new revision is @11168@.
- 10:34 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11167@.
Starting with this update the implementat... - 09:42 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Private and public root CA keys are stored in @root-ca-pk.store@ protected by store password and key entry password. ...
07/03/2017
- 09:24 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11166@.
Added javadoc fix for @ClientsToPortsGene... - 07:13 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been rebased with current trunk @11154@, new revision is @11165@.
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- 2683a was merged to trunk as revision 11154.
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236 (Closed): implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- 05:53 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- The task branch 2683a was merged into the trunc as rev. 11154 and archived.
- 04:17 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Please merge 2683a to trunk.
- 05:19 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > But I still think to keep the values in order to make less changes and for the case I'm missing something, they don...
07/01/2017
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, I think I gave you the wrong password, and I need to re-generate them again - I get the same now (even from Ecl...
- 12:12 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, 2683a rev 11180 contains the certificate-related changes (and the chrome 'subject-alternate-name' fix, too). A...
- 11:40 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- There is this option @webClient/portsRange/forwardedHost@ that can be important to set in Amazon environment. (https:...
- 10:50 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Or we can pass it in as a parameter.
- 10:50 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes.
OK, then I'll need to save its encryption password for its private key in the directory. - 10:49 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
- 10:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, I'm almost done with this: do you want to add 're-use root CA', too? Because otherwise this would need to be re...
- 09:44 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > Otherwise I'll need to read the input from the arguments
Yes, let's make these arguments. I can pass them in as... - 09:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I am already automatically updating the @directory.xml@ placeholders using the Ansible scripting.... - 09:38 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I am already automatically updating the @directory.xml@ placeholders using the Ansible scripting. We can add another...
- 09:33 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If we can provide the mechanism to regen the cert for an arbitrary hostname, then we can meet our... - 09:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Virtual desktop mode works in the POC. AND because of the port range support, I can get multiple simultaneous sessio...
- 09:25 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I'll test it now.
Please consider the cert re-gen issue. - 09:22 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you OK with merging to trunk?
Yes, I don't see any issues.
> Also: I plan to enable virtu... - 09:15 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also: I plan to enable virtual desktop in the poc directory. Is there any reason to disable it?
- 09:14 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Are you OK with merging to trunk?
- 09:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- main part passed, too.
- 09:24 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11164@.
This update starts visual effects impleme...
06/30/2017
- 07:19 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is the ChUI regression testing still running?
CTRL-C I think is passed (cumulative, ... - 07:17 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: Is the ChUI regression testing still running?
- 07:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Planning to log out sooner.
- 07:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I followed https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-apache-http-server-as-reverse-proxy-using-mod_...
- 06:59 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I setup certificates for the FWD server and the embedded web server for demo.goldencode.com. Those just replaced the...
- 06:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I think it helps to fix embedded client's certificate issue. It seems that you wrote about it when preparing an ...
- 06:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can't we just pass through the SSL of the FWD server's? We don't want to generate yet another certificate that is on...
- 06:49 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- At first it is required to create ssl virtual host and it seems that I followed this article https://www.digitalocean...
- 06:45 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- openssl package must be installed.
- 06:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do all of these get installed with the @apache2@ package?
I am not sure, but it seems that the... - 06:34 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Do all of these get installed with the @apache2@ package?
- 06:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please notice modules that enabled by site administrator. All these modules must be installed if you would like to ge...
- 06:27 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also after your configuration has been done, you can check the installed modules by running...
- 06:19 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 55 modified poc directory.xml.
- 06:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please look at these resources:
1)
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-linux-apache-my... - 05:35 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also, please update the directory.xml to have the right ACL and the new port range support for 10 clients.
Include... - 05:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
I'm about to work on that next.
Please make a list of the following:
1. Packages to install to get Apac... - 05:08 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Do you need my help with Apache configuration?
- 05:03 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Don't mind, I found REDACTED/REDACTED
- 05:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can you check in your changes to the POC embedded code?
It doesn't need to change the source c... - 04:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can you check in your changes to the POC embedded code?
- 04:48 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg, Constantin these changes work with the Apache configuration provided by note 152, I... - 04:37 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > It should be a problem, I would like to change a direct access to https://localhost:8443/embedd... - 04:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > It should be a problem, I would like to change a direct access to https://localhost:8443/embedded
Go ahead. - 04:29 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, the poc is built now. I forgot that the embedded client needs a direct access too, but I changed its root ...
- 04:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Ok, but it worked on my host with Posgresql before that.
Hotel was setup for postgresq... - 04:02 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Ok, but it worked on my host with Posgresql before that.
- 04:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Are you on revision 53 of the POC project? You are probably on rev 52 which was hard coded to PostgreSQL.
Try rev... - 03:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I need help with poc setup, I run ant deploy.all and got ...
- 03:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that there no another changes. I updated this poc and started postgresql server, now running ant deploy.all ...
- 03:46 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > It seems that a single fixed port is the same as dynamically allocated from a degraded port range. I didn't provide...
- 03:41 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is there any remaining known issue with 2683a?
> I understand that the POC embedded code needs... - 03:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Is there any remaining known issue with 2683a?
I understand that the POC embedded code needs changes. Is there an... - 03:17 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the cu... - 02:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the customer POC project too.
Gre... - 01:52 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, Constantin these changes work with the Apache configuration provided by note 152, I did not use HTML rewrite mo...
- 01:39 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the customer POC project too.
- 01:26 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, I understand, but there are no ways, we need to change index.html and ehotel.js. It ... - 01:20 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I understand, but there are no ways, we need to change index.html and ehotel.js. It should take into account win...
- 01:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> At first it needs to change dojo config that was set by index.html to
Are these changes ... - 01:10 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exp... - 01:03 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exposed via the firewall?
>
> ... - 01:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exposed via the firewall?
What are the starting UR... - 12:58 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I guess that we need to fix dojo configuration settings....
- 12:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg, if you need to proxy this url https://localhost:8443/, then it should be added sepa... - 12:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I will need to proxy both 8443 and 7443. 8443 is the really important one.
Is there anything else needed? - 12:22 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, if you need to proxy this url https://localhost:8443/, then it should be added separetely, like for this url ht...
- 12:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I just imported hotel server der certificate into Firefox and got embedded clients working properly.
- 12:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Added my default ssl configuration with a mapping file....
- 11:33 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11179 fixed java docs.
- 11:24 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11178, sorry for delay, during tests found that nodes are not updated if it is necessarily to sati...
- 10:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Can I commit com.goldencode.p2j.main.ClientsToPortsGenerator into 2683a?
Yes. - 10:51 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can I commit com.goldencode.p2j.main.ClientsToPortsGenerator into 2683a?
- 10:49 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The clients to ports mapping tool works properly, only it creates case insensitive node name like 'portsrange' instea...
- 10:28 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I read docs and thought that @openBatch@ brackets are used only for security nodes.
- 10:26 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, could you help with this. I will try to add node to the directory using direc... - 10:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin, could you help with this. I will try to add node to the directory using directory API, is it a correct wa...
- 10:15 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- But it will be great if the Apache environment manual tests will be approved and tested on the different host machine.
- 10:12 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports ra... - 10:06 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Make sure that we are testing in 2 modes:
1. Through a reverse proxy.
2. Direct access. - 10:05 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports range is restricted, then it can ... - 10:04 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports range is restricted, then it can be a weak place. I tested wh...
- 09:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > > Thanks, I need this help to run ... - 08:09 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task branch 2683a Revision 11177
I like the changes.
I have only one question: is it possible to h... - 08:06 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually wit... - 08:02 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually with hotel_gui using the emb... - 08:00 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually with hotel_gui using the embedded and web clients taking...
- 07:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: Thanks!
- 07:56 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please run the ChUI regression testing immediately. The CTRL-C tests will be quite important.
- 07:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I didn't run ChUI regression tests.
I'll start these now.
- 07:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't know the answer to this. How critical is it to our delivery today?
>
> Can you provid... - 07:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I don't know the answer to this. How critical is it to our delivery today?
Can you provide a status of things?
... - 06:51 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Web sockets use keep-alive HTTP connections, but does it mean that they leave forever or there exists a default timeo...
- 06:35 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Looking into these ...
- 06:00 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I did not import CA into the browser, it seems that in the Firefox the icon looks like an orange triangle with an exc...
- 04:07 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I removed
> [...]
> from these tested configurations in order to use the standard hot... - 01:30 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I removed ...
- 01:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I have the following issue with the embedded client, probably due to certificate issue.
If the port settings in the ... - 03:27 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I used the whole set of GUI demo scenarios to test the 11172, comparing in parallel, the ABL on dedicated server, dif...
- 01:02 PM Bug #3306: Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- In addition, logic of Page Up, Page Down keys and search by key should be modified in order to match 4GL ROW-DISPLAY ...
- 09:46 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11163@.
This is the base skeleton functionality a...
06/29/2017
- 05:15 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
- 04:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It works now, thank you, I just copied @WebClientLauncher@ section and replaced it with @WebClientRegistrar@. Are the...
- 04:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- This is an ACL issue. In @/security/acl/net/@ you need to add a section for @WebClientRegistrar@ to allow access to ...
- 04:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you :), I rerun with 2683a and found that client logs are rewritten....
- 04:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thank you, I see here only logs for P2J trunc's web client, so the embedded server was no... - 04:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I see here only logs for P2J trunc's web client, so the embedded server was not started at all and the spa...
- 03:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.... - 03:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.
It seems that the spawned pr... - 02:29 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.
- 11:02 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- You are right, it is an issue.
- 11:01 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > > Yes, but it is required to wait ... - 10:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed... - 10:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed. Committed revision 1117... - 10:48 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed. Committed revision 11175 fixed this strict synchron...
- 10:39 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> The considered issue is that if all ports are used by the clients and new one user is try... - 10:27 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The considered issue is that if all ports are used by the clients and new one user is trying to get a client, then it...
- 08:59 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The manual GUI and regression testing are in process now, but the current code has some unknown issue and it should b...
- 08:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> They are present. Please look at these changes
> [...]
Please use a logger and not @Sys... - 08:40 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sorry, I didn't look carefully enough.
What about the readiness for regression/GUI testing? - 08:38 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Committed revision 11173 fixed these trivial issues.
>
> I don't see any new javadoc for Con... - 08:34 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > Committed revision 11173 fixed these trivial issues.
I don't see any new javadoc for Constantin's request in not... - 08:29 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I am using the default @/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl.conf@....
- 08:22 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Sergey: Please finish item 6 in #3236-92 and handle #3236-95. These should be trivial.
Committe... - 08:11 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey: Please finish item 6 in #3236-92 and handle #3236-95. These should be trivial.
I do need you utility prog... - 08:10 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11173 fixed all found issues, but now I am investigating the case when all two ports are used and ...
- 06:01 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: do the changes suitably address your concerns?
Yes.
> Also: perhaps we need to a... - 05:47 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 2. I think that #3236-85 is not yet addressed. What is your plan there?
I think it is address... - 04:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: do the changes suitably address your concerns?
Also: perhaps we need to add some comments to make sure... - 04:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11171
1. The @WebClientManager.try{Acquire|Release}Port()@ methods have a c... - 08:38 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please review committed revision 11171 that added "session counter" from the note 81.
- 04:24 PM Bug #3306: Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- This task is about the browse state which is drawn when ROW-DISPLAY is triggered for multiple rows. See #3275-30 for ...
- 02:09 PM Bug #3306 (New): Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- 11:12 AM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- The implementation has been committed to 3282a and is ready for review. GUI regression tests passed, ChUI tests in pr...
- 10:21 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11162@.
The next preparation step to implement cl...
06/28/2017
- 06:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11170 fixed getFreeLocalPort, now exploring "session counter" from the note 81.
- 03:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> You considered the case of leaking resources in the general case, the port management tha... - 03:32 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, Hynek as I understand correctly there is a case when the web client lives for... - 03:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin, Hynek as I understand correctly there is a case when the web client lives forever and can't reconnect to ...
- 03:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Ok, thank you, we can try blocking API for this case.
- 03:23 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Which is the case with the current implementation, too - when all ports are taken and a... - 03:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if th... - 03:08 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Constantin, does it mean that this problem of leaking reso... - 03:04 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if the almost all resources ar... - 02:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, does it mean that this problem of leaking resources described above exists in... - 02:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if the almost all resources are used (#range -1), correct?...
- 02:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> >
> > Still, the extra load can be easily avoided by scanning th... - 02:45 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
>
> Still, the extra load can be easily avoided by scanning the usedLocalPorts map and only do... - 02:37 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > If I understan... - 02:27 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > If I understand correctly, the check only occurs... - 02:24 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Beside the above, what I have in mind is a possible race condition; consider these execu... - 01:46 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a ... - 12:55 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> When @true@, @running@ flag indicates the client must restart, but the FWD session will ... - 12:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > So, I'm thinking that @isStillAlive@ should have a boolean parameter which 'forces' the... - 12:32 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a port.
Unless I am read... - 12:13 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a port. In the common case (there is a free po...
- 12:10 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I agree if you mean that https involves heavy calculations.
Even without https, one ch... - 12:04 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I agree if you mean that https involves heavy calculations. Committed rev. 11169 fixed all comments that I could do.
- 11:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
> >
> > * In WebClientSpawner ... - 11:14 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
>
> * In WebClientSpawner
> * Below the port should be giv... - 11:11 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
> * In WebClientSpawner
> ** @ if (!"/".equals(webClientConf... - 10:30 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> It seems that DojoToolkitHandler should not be changed, because it is not a web virtual d... - 10:09 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that DojoToolkitHandler should not be changed, because it is not a web virtual directory for the embedded se...
- 10:05 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
>
> In addition to Greg's and Constantin's finds.
>
> * I... - 09:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What I'm trying to confirm is that the FWD server always frees the resources, for a FWD ... - 09:33 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
In addition to Greg's and Constantin's finds.
* In WebClientSpawner
** @ if (!... - 09:31 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I did this because we can't free a given port until its system resources are released.
... - 09:17 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, a... - 09:07 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, and it seems that all listeners ... - 09:03 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, and it seems that all listeners should be notified and @term...
- 07:28 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey, the issues I have are these:
* have you tested if the FWD client terminates abruptly? In this case, the ser... - 06:19 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11167
I have checked in some changes to fix code formatting issues. Overal... - 01:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11167 prepared this branch 2683a for the review.
- 05:32 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- About "value cannot be displayed using ... " case for the browse:
If a cell value cannot be displayed using column f... - 12:48 PM Bug #3305: broken widget references management
- While testing a medium-large GUI application I noticed that at some time (I was not able to pinpoint the exact trigge...
- 12:36 PM Bug #3305 (New): broken widget references management
- 09:42 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The additional experimenting performed to find out the right approach to easily and more effective insert mouse direc...
06/27/2017
- 05:12 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Obviously the time condition in @isRequiredToRedirect()@ is there to distinguish the case when... - 02:47 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- No, it has an issue with the requirement to reconnect to the web client if the network is temporarily down and then i...
- 01:58 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, it simplifies the current logic. It seems that it should work as we expected.
- 01:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Obviously the time condition in @isRequiredToRedirect()@ is there to distinguish the case when the page loads right a...
- 12:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg,
>5. What happens of the MSG_QUIT comes back from the JS side before the driver.shutdown() has completed? Thi...
06/26/2017
- 06:44 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11164 added new options to the directory: @forwardedHost@, @forwardedProto@ and @virtalDesktopEnab...
- 04:13 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Ok, understand, I will add the existing functionality for this case too.
- 04:09 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, this is actually the most important type of client because most (if not all) customers will be using this approa...
- 04:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I see it now. Is it required to implement the port range for this type of clients too? Now they are skipped.
- 03:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- See @hotel_gui/embedded/src/com/goldencode/testcases/embedded/CustomP2JClientApp.java@. This is the embedded mode cl...
- 03:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I missed this entry point and didn't implement the port range for clients created by @WebClientLauncher@. ...
- 02:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The embedded mode comes through the @WebClientLauncher@ remote object which has the @spawn()@ entry point. It does n...
- 02:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Then in this mode can you just refuse non-embedded mode sessions in @WebHandler@?
It seems that ... - 01:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Then in this mode can you just refuse non-embedded mode sessions in @WebHandler@?
- 01:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that if the server refuses GET and POST requests for @/gui@, then the web client session can be established ...
- 12:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- If virtual desktop mode is disabled, can't we just refuse to respond to all requests for path @/gui@?
- 12:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I don't understand how to detect if it is a POST request for the virtual desktop mode or the embedded client mode. We...
- 09:54 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > The system creates a one new OS process per an external request. Does it need to implement CAPTCHA for the login sc...
- 06:22 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I added new methods to allocate and to release system resources to the @Spawn@ interface. It fixed only a part of tha...
- 01:43 PM Bug #3304 (New): Eliminate denial of service in virtual desktop mode
06/23/2017
- 03:49 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I have adjusted the Window management so it duplicate the behaviour I noticed in testcases executed on ABL.
Rebased ... - 10:32 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Ovidiu, is there any estimate when this issue will be merged to trunk?
>
> I am asking bec... - 05:20 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu, is there any estimate when this issue will be merged to trunk?
I am asking because I am implementing some... - 02:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> It seems that it is required to check the provided user/password pair and only then try t... - 01:58 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that @Spawner@ interface should be changed to be able to allocate clients resources if it is required. Plann...
- 11:46 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- This denial of service for non restricted ports is not possible, since the ports is not allocated before the user's O...
- 11:26 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that it is required to check the provided user/password pair and only then try to allocate the web client. G...
- 11:10 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I encountered the following major security risk as Denial of Service attacks at the application level, not at the tcp...
- 09:47 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- You've got it. It is always nice when someone answers their own questions. :)
- 09:41 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, don't matter my questions. It seems that one user must be able to create several web clients sessions with the ...
- 09:38 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- >Why the system don't authenticate the user before the spawn process is started?
I understand, because the system is... - 09:36 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, does it make sense to create a configuration that provides a mapping of a user id to its web client port number...
- 11:19 AM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> According to #3257 note 59 the customer currently uses @WM_SETREDRAW@ Win32 window message t... - 06:21 AM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- > would it be alright to introduce new attribute that would disable/enable window refresh
Yes, the proposed approa... - 05:39 AM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- For the language extension, would it be alright to introduce new attribute that would disable/enable window refresh?
...
06/22/2017
- 03:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11159 added @portsRange@ node under @webClient@ parent node and new business logic to release allo...
- 02:42 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > if we have the case when the ports are given and all of them are used by the current clients, then new local users...
- 01:22 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, if we have the case when the ports are given and all of them are used by the current clients, then new local us...
- 11:31 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > If a user's session is terminated, then this port can be given to new client that is about to be logged, but this p...
- 10:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11156
>
> Overall the approach is OK. Is it working in... - 10:25 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Does it mean that we should check if the session is terminated, but the web client is still running?
- 10:20 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- >4. What happens if the ChUI user executes CTRL-C or the GUI user executes ESC? Does the client properly reopen the s...
06/21/2017
- 04:02 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11156
Overall the approach is OK. Is it working in your testing?
1. The... - 02:54 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- It is important that the web client is not started with the remote debug mode, because in this case it is not possibl...
- 02:52 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Greg, please look at the current 2683a, I tried to explore the idea from https://proj.goldencode.com/issues/3236#note...
- 02:02 PM Feature #1818: implement a timer service to replace the PSTimer OCX
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 1818a Revision 11160
Thank you for the review. I adjusted the code in 11... - 09:24 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- It is interesting that there is no "iterative" ROW-DISPLAY triggering in ChUI. Except UP/DOWN keys which scroll by on...
- 11:04 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11160@. Rebased with current trunk @11153@, new revi...
06/20/2017
- 05:36 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- That is great!
- 05:23 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- It seems that Apache can be configured using map files that simplifies its configuration file to this one...
- 08:52 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Please note that it is NOT a requirement to implement an Nginx configuration. If the Apache approach works well, tha...
- 04:32 PM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- Created task branch 3284a and committed runtime support for WINDOW-STATE:WINDOW-DELAYED-MINIMIZE to it.
- 08:48 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- > but the actual behavior is a lot more fun!
:)
Good work isolating the behavior. - 07:57 AM Feature #3284: implement more window widget support
- The WINDOW-DELAYED-MINIMIZE window state runtime behavior is *really* bizarre. The documentation says "The window is ...
- 09:11 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- After doing some investigation for native 4GL behavior for direct manipulation I've made conclusion the key actor her...
06/19/2017
- 08:58 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Understand this requirement, I think it can be implemented easily using that the reverse proxy can be recognized by a...
- 08:04 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Please make sure that we can run in reverse proxy mode AND/OR in direct access mode (our current approach). Many ins...
- 08:45 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > > Your example revealed a flaw in tooltip management. I need to review the hiding ... - 08:01 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The highest priority is getting the local spawning working with port mapping. Please work on that first and we will ...
06/18/2017
- 01:26 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Actually, 2683 and 3236 can be developed as a one task due to interdependency of these tasks on the reverse proxy con...
- 01:13 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, please help to understand the remote case. There are two cases: 1) the web client is spawned locally and 2) the...
06/17/2017
- 09:37 AM Bug #2765 (Closed): find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- 09:46 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please merge to trunk
Branch @2765b@ was merged to trunk as revno @11153@ then it was archived. - 09:24 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Please merge to trunk
06/16/2017
- 05:46 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The testing completed. Failed test was run in standalone mode. The results can be seen in @... - 05:45 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Do we have to do any other custom configuration for the large ... - 04:49 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > So starting @ChUI@ regression testing.
> How is this going?
All tests are OK e... - 03:52 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Small adjustment for font name and size for @Windows10@ theme. Now the large scale GUI appl... - 03:46 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > What does it display? Empty text?
> The 1st window is label...
06/15/2017
- 07:29 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Next step is: please do some testing in some complex screens of the large GUI applicatio... - 03:08 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- The plan is to add @X-Forwarded-Host@ support by web server to span web client correctly in the presence of the rever...
- 03:00 PM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Created new branch 2683a for this task.
- 09:10 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Should I skip this differences and add to to the "thumb redrawing" redmine issue?
Yes, so long as the difference... - 09:08 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- OK, I'll figure out which part is necessary. Overall I'm going to stick to the plan
@ThinClient.trigger@ initial ... - 08:53 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- I'm not sure. Some of the processing in @ThinClient.trigger()@ is to properly enable recursion, which you said canno...
- 08:33 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Basically my question is if the client-side trigger processing in @ThinClient.trigger@ necessary for its counterpart ...
- 08:26 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Wrap BrowseWidget.getRows with the code from ThinClient.trigger.
What do you mean by "wrap"? I prefer not to du... - 05:54 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg, am I right that server-side ROW-DISPLAY trigger should be called in that way?
# Wrap @BrowseWidget.getRows@ wi... - 08:44 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What does it display? Empty text?
The 1st window is labeled as "Window 1 has parent". L...
06/14/2017
- 05:22 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Note that if we strive for 100% authenticity server-side ROW-DISPLAY doesn't make sense because we need to redraw t...
- 05:17 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Some notes on what can be done during ROW-DISPLAY processing for multiple rows:
# Browse itself and other widgets ar... - 04:21 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ... the title of the parent-less window from your testcase should be @unknown@ since their ... - 04:16 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * @WindowTitleBar@ - missing history entry
> I was about to revert this one too, but I s... - 12:41 PM Feature #1818: implement a timer service to replace the PSTimer OCX
- Code Review Task Branch 1818a Revision 11160
As mentioned before, this is really good work. Some feedback:
1. ... - 10:34 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Code Review Task Branch 3279a Revision 11160
1. The SUB-TYPE members added to @ComboBoxWidget@ need javadoc.
2....
06/13/2017
- 04:04 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please let me know what is left with this task.
I am not aware of anything el... - 12:31 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu, please let me know what is left with this task.
What I'm aware of in 2676a rev 11170:
* @WindowLayout@,... - 03:16 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > We just do not need to provide separate font files within GUI package.
> OK, so your ... - 12:48 PM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The @Hotel GUI project@ will use the aliases even they are not directly included into @dire... - 11:27 AM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie, the changes in 2765b rev 11163 are OK; please add a history entry to @FontDetai... - 05:58 AM Bug #2765: find proper freely licensed replacements for the MS Windows OS fonts
- Eugenie, the changes in 2765b rev 11163 are OK; please add a history entry to @FontDetails@ and also a question about...
- 11:08 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > If browse-specific state in the screen buffer can be changed then we need to make sure that the screen buffer is se...
- 10:40 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > But in the case trigger contains user interactions or alert boxes, we have to somehow detect that we have an intera...
- 10:08 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Can we iteratively execute the trigger on the server side, without down-calls to the client?
At first look I thin... - 09:33 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > iterative ROW-DISPLAY triggering (note that most of browse attributes, like DOWN or SCREEN-VALUE (not readable), a...
06/09/2017
- 01:42 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11159@.
Added new class to @../ui/client/gui@ pac... - 07:32 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- I like your plan.
- 08:47 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- This is the rest of file list dropping implementation plan. Because all real event are happening on the client side(g...
- 10:14 AM Feature #1818: implement a timer service to replace the PSTimer OCX
- Technical details for the summary from note 20.
The @.ext-hints@ looks like this... - 09:37 AM Feature #1818: implement a timer service to replace the PSTimer OCX
- As with revision 11159 of branch 1818a, FWD looks for a special @.ext-hints@ file (I can optionally move the content ...
- 09:12 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- My bad, REFRESH doesn't trigger ROW-DISPLAY, only search by key. I'll clean up records.
- 08:34 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- All ROW-DISPLAY rules will be stored in updatable item 30.
We should decide if we want to support 1. iterative ROW...
06/08/2017
- 06:09 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11158@.
Reworked to resolve the notes for @Droppa... - 04:26 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > What is the effort to get this to match the weird Progress behavior?
For a start:
# PageDown for some cases shoul... - 04:13 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > I think it's not worth to exactly duplicate this behavior until (if) we come to the point when it will be necessary...
Also available in: Atom