Activity
From 08/04/2021 to 09/02/2021
09/02/2021
- 11:52 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
>
> > >Doesn't the replacement widget in #3822 use the @TREEV... - 11:42 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> >Doesn't the replacement widget in #3822 use the @TREEVIEW@ code internally?
>
> Yes, ... - 10:58 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?... - 10:49 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- > > Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?
>
> Do you mean ... - 10:43 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?
... - 10:14 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Eugenie: Could this code have been used in that customer-specific OCX replacement from #3822?
- 09:24 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: We generally don't add random features. Why was the feature there if it is not needed?... - 08:59 AM Bug #5280: TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treeview co...
- Vladimir: We generally don't add random features. Why was the feature there if it is not needed? I'm worried that i...
09/01/2021
- 03:16 PM Bug #5280 (Review): TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Tr...
- 03:16 PM Bug #5280 (WIP): TREEVIEW: Vertical rollover feature: assure TREEVIEW is compatible with MS Treev...
- Tested: the roll-over feature does not exist in MS TreeView.
Fixed in FWD 3821c rev. 12882 - 09:32 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> @TreeViewWidget.clearAll@ invalidates the nodes...
the proper @tree:Nodes:Clear@ con... - 08:45 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- SOLVED Scrolling issue:
# Run @treeview.p@ application
# Expand enough nodes to make vertical scrollbar visible.
... - 08:38 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Treeview rendering issues:
# Extra line up from the first root node
# The node text is clipped from the left.
... - 08:34 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- The treeview demo app reference screen in OE:
!5622-treeview-demoapp-OE.png! - 08:27 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > @TreeViewWidget.clearAll@ invalidates the nodes, which may be ... - 01:55 AM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> @TreeViewWidget.clearAll@ invalidates the nodes, which may be referenced by 4gl as the ...
08/31/2021
- 06:43 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- The @TreeNodeCollectionResource.add(NumberType anchorIndex, NumberType relationType, character key, character text)@ ...
- 06:24 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- RESOLVED. @TreeViewWidget.clearAll@ invalidates the nodes, which may be referenced by 4gl as the result of ``tree:Nod...
- 06:03 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Solved: the .ext-hints file was invalid.
The corrected one is attached.
Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> REJECTED. C... - 06:01 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Conversion issue: the valid 4gl call:...
- 02:08 PM Bug #5622 (WIP): TREEVIEW widget issues
- The test application to demonstrate conversion problems above: @treeview.p@, @treeview.p.ext-hints@.
This applicat... - 02:05 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Conversion crashes on the following valid 4gl:...
- 01:27 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- REJECTED. Conversion/runtime issue: missing method. The 4gl:...
- 01:18 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Conversion produces invalid Java statement:...
08/27/2021
- 05:19 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The semantic and implementations for @tree:Nodes:remove()@ in FWD do not match that of ... - 04:52 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- The semantic and implementations for @tree:Nodes:remove()@ in FWD do not match that of _Microsoft TreeView Control 6....
08/26/2021
- 01:39 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- In original _Microsoft TreeView Control 6.0 (SP6)_ OCX control the *plus/minus button* is visible if and only if *the...
- 01:05 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- In original _Microsoft TreeView Control 6.0 (SP6)_ OCX control node keys must be unique across the tree. Currently in...
- 12:58 PM Bug #5622: TREEVIEW widget issues
- In this task various issues related to the @TREEVIEW@ FWD widget issues, and its difference from @TREELIST@ FWD widge...
- 12:47 PM Bug #5622 (WIP): TREEVIEW widget issues
08/20/2021
- 10:40 AM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The @hasChildren@ (branch or leaf) node attribute issue:
>
> # When a child is added...
08/19/2021
- 06:55 PM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- The @hasChildren@ (branch or leaf) node attribute issue:
# When a child is added to a node, FWD sets the @hasChild... - 07:49 AM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- Mouse event (@OnMouseLeftUp@, @OnMouseLeftDown@, @OnMouseRightUp@) triggers issue: all 3 callback arguments passed to...
- 07:42 AM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- @DeleteOnCollapse@ mode issue:
In FWD, in @DeleteOnCollapse@ mode the collapsed node subtree is not removed, if th...
08/18/2021
- 07:09 PM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The API call @tree:DeleteChildNodes(nodeId)@ is not currently implemented, but is is us... - 05:12 PM Bug #5118: TREELIST widget issues
- The API call @tree:DeleteChildNodes(nodeId)@ is not currently implemented, but is is used in customer code.
08/06/2021
- 03:48 PM Bug #5587 (WIP): Decimal format not handled properly
- 03:42 PM Bug #5587: Decimal format not handled properly
- I am going to compare how the @NumberType.toString@ handles the format, since the message comes out without the space...
- 11:46 AM Bug #5587: Decimal format not handled properly
- Another issue is the extra space that comes between the user data, and the first digit. It appears that the sign is r...
- 10:29 AM Bug #5587: Decimal format not handled properly
- Another issue is the alignment of side-labels is a little off in GUI when @colon-aligned@ is set. The alignment doesn...
- 10:26 AM Bug #5587: Decimal format not handled properly
- Another issue related to format is we don't give an error condition that the 4GL does.
In the testcase mentioned ... - 10:21 AM Bug #5587: Decimal format not handled properly
- The display output for a decimal fill-in does not match the 4GL.
In ChUI, we are not handling user data correctly.... - 10:08 AM Bug #5587 (WIP): Decimal format not handled properly
08/04/2021
- 02:29 PM Support #4955 (Closed): web client/javascript drawing - fast vs crisp
- 02:23 PM Support #4955: web client/javascript drawing - fast vs crisp
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Other than #5390, #5532 and #5582, is there any additional work or ... - 11:34 AM Support #4955: web client/javascript drawing - fast vs crisp
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Other than #5390, #5532 and #5582, is there any additional work or known issues related to webgl ... - 07:35 AM Support #4955: web client/javascript drawing - fast vs crisp
- Other than #5390, #5532 and #5582, is there any additional work or known issues related to webgl support? I want to ...
- 07:50 AM Support #5584 (New): WidgetRegistry.getComponent() is expensive and can be optimized
- 07:47 AM Support #5583 (New): MenuGuiImpl redraws everything when only a subset of drawing is needed
- 07:33 AM Bug #5582: webgl renderer is significantly slower than canvas2d (performance regression)
- At one time, the webgl renderer was faster than canvas2d for some browser versions and at least equivalent to canvas2...
- 07:23 AM Bug #5582 (New): webgl renderer is significantly slower than canvas2d (performance regression)
Also available in: Atom