Activity

From 02/23/2026 to 03/24/2026

03/24/2026

05:22 AM Bug #11314 (WIP): UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't select t...: Code review 11314a.
The history entry @028@ description reads: _"Don't clear the list selection if for CTRL + LEFT... Hynek Cihlar
05:14 AM Bug #11170 (WIP): The caret position is initially wrong for DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN widgets: Code review 11170.
# *@ThinClient@ dependency creates layer violation, NPE risk, and inconsistency*: The @getIniti... Hynek Cihlar
04:47 AM Bug #11191: ChUI: COMBO-BOX raises error 4058 on valid SCREEN-VALUE assignment: Did some extensive testing for the following control set entities: radio-set, combo-box and selection-list. Consider ... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
04:46 AM Bug #10875 (WIP): COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: Code review 10875a.
*DefaultList history header format error.* The new history entry reads @* 016 DMM 20260320@ b... Hynek Cihlar

03/23/2026

07:50 AM Bug #10938 (Review): Date FILL-IN: Incorrect SCREEN-VALUE after widget enablement: *Hynek*: Please review 10938a/rev. 16470. Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:28 AM Bug #10875 (Review): COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: Created a new issue in User Interface for @CTRL + UP/DOWN@ events behavior in ChUI mode because in FWD they don't wor... Delia Mitric
06:24 AM Bug #11319: CTRL_UP/CTRL_DOWN event in ChUI mode for a COMBO-BOX should do nothing: Testcase:... Delia Mitric
06:23 AM Bug #11319 (New): CTRL_UP/CTRL_DOWN event in ChUI mode for a COMBO-BOX should do nothing: Delia Mitric
05:48 AM Bug #11170 (Review): The caret position is initially wrong for DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN widgets: The solution is committed to *11170a* branch rev. *16408*.
Hynek, please review.
Thank you! Delia Mitric
03:54 AM Bug #11314 (Review): UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't selec...: Delia Mitric
03:53 AM Bug #11314 (WIP): UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't select t...: Committed a solution to *11314a* branch rev. *16480*.
Hynek, please review when you get a chance. Thanks! Delia Mitric

03/20/2026

08:39 AM Bug #11314: UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't select the cor...: The issue seems to come from the fact that selection from the list is emptied when event CTRL_LEFT/CTRL_RIGHT occurs ... Delia Mitric
06:47 AM Bug #11314: UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't select the cor...: This is a simple COMBO-BOX testcase from #10875:... Delia Mitric
06:43 AM Bug #11314 (Test): UP/DOWN key pressed after CTRL_LEFT /CTRL_RIGHT in a COMBO-BOX doesn't select ...: Delia Mitric
07:10 AM Bug #11191 (WIP): ChUI: COMBO-BOX raises error 4058 on valid SCREEN-VALUE assignment: Analyzed the error handling from 4GL related to setting the @SCREEN-VALUE@ attribute. I'll use the following messages... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:20 AM Bug #10875: COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: Committed some changes for GUI issue: 10875a branch rev. *16478*.
Added functionality for @CTRL_UP@ and @CTRL_DOWN@ ... Delia Mitric
05:23 AM Bug #10875: COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: It seems that in *ChUI* mode in FWD, even if we press @CTRL-DOWN@ combo, for example, the "processed" event is @CURSO... Delia Mitric
04:56 AM Bug #10875: COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: Created task branch *10875a*. Delia Mitric
04:00 AM Bug #10875: COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: There are two aspects:
* In FWD *GUI* mode, the @CTRL@ + @UP/DOWN@ key doesn't work like in OE. The behavior shoul... Delia Mitric
03:17 AM Bug #10875 (WIP): COMBO-BOX: Ctrl-UP and Ctrl-DOWN keys do nothing: Delia Mitric
02:46 AM Bug #10938: Date FILL-IN: Incorrect SCREEN-VALUE after widget enablement: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Razvan, it is important to figure out the exact point in the 4GL execution when widgets are in... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

03/19/2026

09:12 AM Bug #10938: Date FILL-IN: Incorrect SCREEN-VALUE after widget enablement: Razvan, it is important to figure out the exact point in the 4GL execution when widgets are initialized. Is it really... Hynek Cihlar
08:46 AM Bug #10938: Date FILL-IN: Incorrect SCREEN-VALUE after widget enablement: I've tested this patch:... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

03/17/2026

06:56 AM Bug #11303: Editor isn't drawn when it is defined using INNER-CHARS and INNER-LINES: Testcase:... Delia Mitric
06:52 AM Bug #11303 (Review): Editor isn't drawn when it is defined using INNER-CHARS and INNER-LINES: Delia Mitric
03:31 AM Bug #10938 (WIP): Date FILL-IN: Incorrect SCREEN-VALUE after widget enablement: The core issue is that after processing the ENABLE statement on client and handling the new screen buffers on the ser... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

03/16/2026

09:32 AM Bug #11114 (Internal Test): NPE when redirecting terminal: Thanks, please put it in test. Constantin Asofiei
09:25 AM Bug #11114: NPE when redirecting terminal: Yes. In ChUI, @Window.message()@ is invoked which sends the text to both the terminal and stream:... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
09:06 AM Bug #11114: NPE when redirecting terminal: In ChUI, the message also appears at the terminal/message area. In GUI, it does not appear in message area. This is... Constantin Asofiei
05:23 AM Bug #11114 (Review): NPE when redirecting terminal: Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
05:23 AM Bug #11114 (WIP): NPE when redirecting terminal: When an error message was displayed in redirected mode, without ALERT-BOX, the request was sent to the legacy message... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
08:50 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > In regard to the widget hierarchy rework, I think we might be well served to extract the WIN32 control behavior int... Alexandru Lungu
08:29 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: In regard to the widget hierarchy rework, I think we might be well served to extract the WIN32 control behavior into ... Greg Shah
08:12 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > Previously I mentioned it would be impossible to provide good UX using the canvas rendering approach, but I think m... Alexandru Lungu
07:56 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> So .NET controls will be rendered in iframes?
Yes, not in canvas but in DOM. There are p... Hynek Cihlar
07:40 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > This was my point in #11283-13 that "We could consider reworking the widget hierarchy to implement a set of more ge... Alexandru Lungu

03/13/2026

12:43 PM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > So instead of trying to make the .NET effort named C extend B, what about having parallel implementations so that B... Greg Shah
12:03 PM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Alex, I think we are both on the same trajectory with your ABC decomposition. The question is what should be still co... Hynek Cihlar
10:50 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > The Infragistics web controls may not be fully compatible with the .NET versions.
I also had this POV in #11283-... Alexandru Lungu
10:49 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > The programming model goes from declarative to imperative. You can't wrap an object-based, manually-constructed con... Alexandru Lungu
10:18 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah wrote:
> This is an interesting idea. I recall that use of .NET GUI must be on a Windows Form as the cont... Hynek Cihlar
10:13 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah wrote:
> > Legacy 4GL UI is declarative, frame-based, blocking, and coupled to the database transaction mo... Hynek Cihlar
07:38 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > Legacy 4GL UI is declarative, frame-based, blocking, and coupled to the database transaction model. .NET UI is impe... Greg Shah
03:02 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> This leads me to the question. Do we actually want to extend our implementation of the legacy ... Hynek Cihlar
07:53 AM Bug #11294 (Review): Widget is overlapped by another widget after the parent frame is made visible: Delia Mitric
07:53 AM Bug #11294 (WIP): Widget is overlapped by another widget after the parent frame is made visible: Found a solution based on the changes from #11179:
* move the hidden widgets (not frames) on the top of the parent f... Delia Mitric
03:45 AM Bug #11294: Widget is overlapped by another widget after the parent frame is made visible: This testcase:... Delia Mitric
03:38 AM Bug #11294 (Review): Widget is overlapped by another widget after the parent frame is made visible: Delia Mitric

03/12/2026

07:33 PM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Some more thoughts.
The .NET UI is a completely different beast from the legacy UI. It's fundamentally different p... Hynek Cihlar
10:06 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: Let me know how you think this can fit in to your current workload.
Since Lyra is movin... Hynek Cihlar
08:28 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek: In regard to your idea from #11283-8, what do you estimate it wou... Greg Shah
08:24 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Exposing the new .NET UI classes directly to 4GL OO code makes sense. The conversion would then be quite direct. Greg Shah
08:15 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > We could consider reworking the widget hierarchy to implement a set of more generic base classes that map to WIN32 ... Alexandru Lungu
05:21 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: In regard to your idea from #11283-8, what do you estimate it would take to do a POC for i... Hynek Cihlar
04:59 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Hynek: In regard to your idea from #11283-8, what do you estimate it would take to do a POC for implementing the @Ult... Greg Shah
04:57 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: The customer reports that their entire UI is based on the .NET GUI. This means that we would need to implement more t... Greg Shah
05:14 AM Bug #10915: ugly dialogs: Rebased revision 16490 (10915a). Sergey Ivanovskiy

03/11/2026

07:52 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: My last note is in regard to #11284. "NET Windows Form usage" can happen from within 4GL code or C# code. The link in... Alexandru Lungu
07:33 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah wrote:
> I was not planning to use any Infragistics or .NET binaries from any replacement controls. The i... Hynek Cihlar
07:13 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: I was not planning to use any Infragistics or .NET binaries from any replacement controls. The idea is to implement ... Greg Shah
06:55 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: > Rewriting the controls will surely be the most code but I think the least troubles in the end.
I would add "the ... Alexandru Lungu
06:11 AM Bug #10856 (Test): Logical FILL-IN: Caret position issues: Branch *10856a* was merged into trunk as rev. *16467* and archived. Delia Mitric
06:04 AM Bug #10856 (Merge Pending): Logical FILL-IN: Caret position issues: Delia Mitric wrote:
> It is ready to be merged
Looks good to me as well. 10856a can be merged right now.
Radu Apetrii
05:44 AM Bug #10856: Logical FILL-IN: Caret position issues: Another GUI customer application has been successfully tested.
The testing phase is complete.
It is ready to be m... Delia Mitric
05:12 AM Bug #10856: Logical FILL-IN: Caret position issues: Rebased branch *10856a*. Delia Mitric

03/10/2026

03:32 PM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Rewriting the controls will surely be the most code but I think the least troubles in the end.... Hynek Cihlar
02:32 PM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Rewriting the controls will surely be the most code but I think the least troubles in the end. This will be a really ... Hynek Cihlar
10:54 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Idea 2 is supposed to be HTML components which may bring their own complications (as we will want to integrate this t... Constantin Asofiei
10:43 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Using AWT won't solve much for us considering the target will surely be web. The ideas for re-routing the output and... Greg Shah
10:32 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: h3. Idea 1
> Looks like there are .NET to AWT bridges like https://jnbridge.com/ which integrate winforms with AWT... Alexandru Lungu
09:25 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Looks like there are .NET to AWT bridges like https://jnbridge.com/ which integrate winforms with AWT/Swing. But to ... Constantin Asofiei
08:58 AM Support #11283: design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: If a customer has a lot of .NET Windows Form usage, I'd like to discuss the kinds of things we can do to effectively ... Greg Shah
08:56 AM Support #11283 (New): design discussion of how to replace .NET Windows Forms usage: Greg Shah
07:03 AM Bug #10856: Logical FILL-IN: Caret position issues: Delia, I reran the ChUI regression tests with the changes from 10856a. Previously there were 28 failing tests, but no... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

03/09/2026

08:31 AM Bug #11170: The caret position is initially wrong for DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN widgets: Committed a fix to *11170a branch as rev 16407*, but while testing it on different DECIMAL formats, found that for "9... Delia Mitric
05:31 AM Bug #11170: The caret position is initially wrong for DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN widgets: The initial cursor position for @DECIMAL FILL-IN@ is 8 because of the *screen.length()* value which is 9.
When the ... Delia Mitric

03/06/2026

09:08 AM Bug #11252 (Test): New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Sergey Ivanovskiy
09:07 AM Bug #11252 (Internal Test): New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: 11252a merged into the trunk as rev 16459 and archived. Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:50 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: OK. Rebasing 11252a. Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:03 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: > Actually it is Sergey to do the merge.
Sorry about that. Alexandru Lungu
07:59 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Actually it is Sergey to do the merge. Greg Shah
07:52 AM Bug #11252 (Merge Pending): New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Yes. Stanislav, please merge after 11227a. Alexandru Lungu
07:50 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Alex: This is ready for merge and it is one that affects the customer for whom trunk is frozen right now. Should it ... Greg Shah

03/05/2026

01:40 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Please disregard my messages 20 and 22.
> Stanislav, can we merge this? Did you do any testing?
I checked that sa... Stanislav Lomany
01:32 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Sorry, I messed up the task Stanislav Lomany
01:31 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Yes. Stanislav Lomany
01:29 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Can 11252a be merged into the trunk? Sergey Ivanovskiy
08:28 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: I just executed ChUI regression testing for the case. Yes, I think we can merge. Stanislav Lomany
07:42 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Stanislav, can we merge this? Did you do any testing? Constantin Asofiei
05:50 AM Bug #11044 (Review): FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Committed a final solution to *11044b rev. 16458*.
(The latest commit (rev. *16457*) had a problem: when the user in... Delia Mitric

03/04/2026

05:11 AM Bug #11044: FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Delia Mitric wrote:
> Found that the LOGICAL FILL-IN doesn't behave the same as DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN when it cont... Delia Mitric
04:05 AM Bug #11044: FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Delia Mitric wrote:
> Another difference is that:
> For a @LOGICAL FILL-IN@ if it contains a *selected text* and th... Delia Mitric
03:47 AM Bug #11044: FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Created a new branch *11044b* because I rebased the first one and the conversion on the app I test fails (even if I u... Delia Mitric
02:29 AM Bug #11044: FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Another difference is that:
For a @LOGICAL FILL-IN@ if it contains a *selected text* and the user press *BACKSPACE* ... Delia Mitric
02:19 AM Bug #11044: FILL-IN with Unknown Value: Incorrect Key Input Handling: Found that the LOGICAL FILL-IN doesn't behave the same as DECIMAL/INTEGER FILL-IN when it contains "?" (selected or n... Delia Mitric

03/02/2026

06:10 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I would also like *Constantin* to take a quick look at the update.
I'm OK with the changes. Constantin Asofiei
06:01 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: I would also like *Constantin* to take a quick look at the update. Stanislav Lomany
05:59 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Stanislav: Can this be put into testing? Greg Shah
06:03 AM Bug #10915 (Review): ugly dialogs: Sergey Ivanovskiy
06:03 AM Bug #10915 (WIP): ugly dialogs: Sergey Ivanovskiy
05:59 AM Bug #10915: ugly dialogs: Why is this in Feedback status? (Feedback is reserved for waiting for a customer response). Greg Shah

02/28/2026

01:39 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: > rev 16451(11252a).
It's good. Stanislav Lomany

02/27/2026

02:52 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Stanislav, thank you for findings. Those issues fixed in rev 16451(11252a). Sergey Ivanovskiy
12:03 PM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: > 16450.(11252a).
It is good. Minor thing: I may guess that according to our coding standards @enum TYPE@ should b... Stanislav Lomany
08:55 AM Bug #11252: New Session functionality is broken for the virtual desktop mode: Stanislav, I rebased and fixed java doc, cleaned the code rev 16450.(11252a). Please review. Sergey Ivanovskiy
06:24 AM Bug #11211: Improve source detection when dispatching mouse wheel events: Aaaand, another one. If it's alright, I would like both Alex and Serban to look at the changes. Thank you! Radu Apetrii

Also available in: Atom

Project

General

Profile

FWD » Core Development » User Interface

Activity

Activity

03/24/2026

03/23/2026

03/20/2026

03/19/2026

03/17/2026

03/16/2026

03/13/2026

03/12/2026

03/11/2026

03/10/2026

03/09/2026

03/06/2026

03/05/2026

03/04/2026

03/02/2026

02/28/2026

02/27/2026

02/26/2026

02/25/2026

02/24/2026

02/23/2026