FWD » Core Development » Conversion Tools

01/26/2017

09:13 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11143@.
Completed handling of the browse widget options/attrib... Eugenie Lyzenko

01/25/2017

11:51 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Ovidiu, can you take a look at @searchpath@ in directory.xml, too? From what I see, this is OS-dependent, too... Constantin Asofiei

11:50 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

> I don't think this will require retesting.
Agreed.
Excellent. After the @WINDOW-SYSTEM@ changes are checked... Greg Shah

11:32 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

I already rebased the branch to latest trunk (rev 11144). Before rebasing, the branch passed all tests (devsrv01 and ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:21 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Code Review Task Branch 3225a Revision 11144
I like the changes.
Other than the @WINDOW-SYSTEM@ defaults, what ... Greg Shah

11:06 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

I believe that if the original application code is run in @prowin32.exe@, then @WINDOW-SYSTEM@ will return @MS-WIN95@... Greg Shah

10:58 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Greg Shah wrote:
> For GUI projects, we should default @WINDOW-SYSTEM@ to @MS-WIN95@ for both:
>
> * @LogicalTerm... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:51 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

For GUI projects, we should default @WINDOW-SYSTEM@ to @MS-WIN95@ for both:
* @LogicalTerminal.getWindowSystem()@ ... Greg Shah

09:44 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

@SESSION:WINDOW-SYSTEM@ handling is unchanged. It should be @TTY@ as defaulted in @com.goldencode.p2j.preproc.Options... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:03 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

To what value are you defaulting the @WINDOWS-SYSTEM@ preprocessor define? Greg Shah

08:46 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Ovidiu, 3225a rev 11143 looks OK - I see that you rely on @OPSYS=WIN32@ to determine if this is a Windows OS. I need... Constantin Asofiei

07:38 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Ask Stanislav if you have any questions about the status of a browse option. Greg Shah

09:45 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11142@.
This is update for browse widget options status. Not a... Eugenie Lyzenko

01/24/2017

05:56 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> Both @MIN-HEIGHT-CHARS@ and @CREATE-ON-ADD@ can be marked as @rw.rt_lvl_stub@.
Task branch @15... Eugenie Lyzenko

05:11 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Both @MIN-HEIGHT-CHARS@ and @CREATE-ON-ADD@ can be marked as @rw.rt_lvl_stub@. Greg Shah

04:04 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

The attribute @CREATE-ON-ADD@ has limited support even less than @MIN-HEIGHT-CHARS@. It is implemented on the server ... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:48 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

The attribute @MIN-HEIGHT-CHARS@ is supported but only by setting @config.minHeightChars@ value. Actually this value ... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:39 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

@kw_creat_oa@ is an attribute. We have some support. You'll have to check the details. Greg Shah

02:26 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> Method @kw_mov_col@ is now fully supported too.
OK. I looked inside the task and one point lef... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:19 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Method @kw_mov_col@ is now fully supported too. Greg Shah

02:13 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

> Is it normal?
Yes, for the FWD project (and TRPL and Harness).
> Our internals are now visible for everyone?... Greg Shah

01:40 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> I think some updates to the supported attributes are still missing.
>
> Both prog.kw_col_mov a... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:18 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

I think some updates to the supported attributes are still missing.
Both prog.kw_col_mov and prog.kw_col_res are n... Greg Shah

09:30 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11139@. Rebased with trunk @11138@, new version is @11140@.
Cr... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:14 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Task branch 3225a was updated yesterday. The current revision is 11142. The latest changes expect that all paths in @... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01/23/2017

05:30 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

I guess the answer depends on whether there are child nodes that represent unsupported configurations. For now, just... Greg Shah

03:24 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

The question:
If other phrases are the parts of the frame phrase or frame option - should it be also added into @u... Eugenie Lyzenko

04:13 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> In preference to item 5 of note 7, please work on these parts of item 4:
>
> * frame options a... Eugenie Lyzenko

01/21/2017

07:27 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

In preference to item 5 of note 7, please work on these parts of item 4:
* frame options and frame phrases
* brow... Greg Shah

01/20/2017

06:06 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Yes. That makes sense. Greg Shah

05:42 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> One tricky thing is that the PatternEngine will require us to pass in an AST when we run it. But... Eugenie Lyzenko

04:56 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

One tricky thing is that the PatternEngine will require us to pass in an AST when we run it. But all these rules don... Greg Shah

04:54 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

> As far as I understand we need to use the data provided by expression.rules file to generate the textile tables lik... Greg Shah

04:39 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Clarification for the implementation point number 5 in note #1521-7.
As far as I understand we need to use the dat... Eugenie Lyzenko

12:01 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Code Review Task Branch 1521a Revision 11138
The changes are good. Greg Shah

11:03 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Task branch @1521a@ for review updated to revision @11138@.
The @expressions.rules@ updated to change the supporte... Eugenie Lyzenko

10:12 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Greg Shah wrote:
> @<rule>attrs.put(prog.kw_cur_iter, rw.cvt_lvl_full | rw.rt_lvl_partial)</rule>@ seems corre... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:21 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

@<rule>attrs.put(prog.kw_cur_iter, rw.cvt_lvl_full | rw.rt_lvl_partial)</rule>@ seems correct. Please put a co... Greg Shah

08:56 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Rebased task branch @1251a@ from P2J trunk revision @11137@. Still no changes since branch creation. Eugenie Lyzenko

09:08 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

I have scanned the files from bzr @log -v -r11021@. In addition I have looked into p2j/ui/* directory(with subdirs) a... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:29 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

> I will fix the separators definition also.
What do you mean?
I think the @file-separator@ and @path-separato... Greg Shah

01:22 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Greg Shah wrote:
> > OTOH, we force in the definition of propath parameters that are dependent on the current machin... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:06 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

> so @file-separator@ and @path-separator@ are used by conversion to know how to parse the legacy strings found in co... Greg Shah

12:58 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

OK, so @file-separator@ and @path-separator@ are used by conversion to know how to parse the legacy strings found in ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:35 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

> I might not have understand it fully, but I had the feeling that the propath, file-separator and path-separator fro... Greg Shah

11:30 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

I might not have understand it fully, but I had the feeling that the @propath@, @file-separator@ and @path-separator@... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:15 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

> please confirm, that these must be the legacy values as found on the OS where the legacy application was run, not w... Greg Shah

10:19 AM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Ovidiu, review for 3225a rev 11141 :
* beside the @basepath@ which must use file-separator specific to the OS where ... Constantin Asofiei

01/19/2017

02:44 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Created task branch @1521a@ from trunk revision @11136@. Eugenie Lyzenko

01:57 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

I have found the @RESIZABLE@ attribute has runtime support. So at least one change is required for @expression.rules@... Eugenie Lyzenko

07:23 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

I think you have the right idea. I don't need you to review every line of code change. Instead, I just want you to ... Greg Shah

07:16 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Let me clarify the point number 1 in in #1521-7.
The expression.rules file is a list of 4GL language elements(lite... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:32 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Status of: 3225a/11139:
* passed full regression testing on devsrv01;
* conversion successful on both Linux/Windows... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01/17/2017

12:05 PM Feature #1521 (WIP): implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach

Eugenie: You and I will be working on this together. It is time to complete this.
h3. Todos
# -Make sure that ... Greg Shah

11:23 AM Feature #1515: implement gap analysis views in all reports

This involves updating the @profile.rpt@ and @schema.rpt@ to change the @<report>@ element to include this attribute:... Greg Shah

01/13/2017

03:05 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The same stands for @case-sensitive@, @path-separator@ and @file-separator@. They are used ... Constantin Asofiei

12:54 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Greg Shah wrote:
> I prefer to encode everything in a standard way (using @/@ and @:@).
Committed 1st revision. A... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01/12/2017

02:58 PM Feature #3225: windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

When we run conversion, you have to have a different @p2j.cfg.xml@ file that depends on whether you are running the c... Greg Shah

02:41 PM Feature #3225 (WIP): windows vs linux in p2j.cfg.xml

Greg Shah