Activity
From 03/21/2017 to 04/19/2017
04/19/2017
04/18/2017
- 06:26 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Rebased task branch @1521c@ from P2J trunk revision @11148@. New revision is @11152@.
- 12:53 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Branch 1514a was rebased from trunk rev 11147.
04/17/2017
- 06:05 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Rebased task branch @1521c@ from P2J trunk revision @11147@. New revision is @11151@.
- 01:46 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Task branch @1521c@ for review updated to revision @11150@.
All changes for only @gaps/expressions.rule@. This upd...
04/12/2017
- 04:49 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- A few notes about the RPC. While I agree with Greg that the REST-like programming model isn't a good fit, I think we ...
- 11:59 AM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- The objective for this task is to create a Java-based reporting engine that has an embedded web server (leveraging Je...
04/11/2017
- 05:39 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- AngularJS can be use as a client of RESTful Web Services, https://docs.angularjs.org/tutorial/step_10, https://docs....
- 04:29 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> What I'm trying to get at is your impression of GWT and specifically the RPC functionality
... - 03:36 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Eric, 3222a exposes @com.goldencode.p2j.admin.AdminServerImpl@ remotely to the browser GWT client. It implements an a...
- 02:23 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Eric, let me first ask about the design of the report app. Why is the backend needed? Is the d... - 01:44 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Hynek, Sergey, I've added you as watchers to this issue because I would like your feedback, ... - 01:18 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Thanks, I'm reading through the GWT project website now.
What I'm trying to get at is your impression of GWT and s... - 12:56 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- It seems that there are these GWT capabilities http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/tutorial/JSON.html, http://www.gw...
- 12:24 PM Feature #1514 (WIP): implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Created branch 1514a.
- 12:13 PM Feature #1514: implement fully dynamic reports (backed by the database)
- Hynek, Sergey, I've added you as watchers to this issue because I would like your feedback, based on your use of GWT ...
- 08:27 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It will depend on the list of use cases. Make the list here and I will share specific thoughts.
... - 05:26 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > The remaining keyword is SYMBOL. As I recall there were notes for this keyword, need to perform special processing ...
- 05:25 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > If the keyword is not encountered in rule file - does it always mean the support level is none?
Usually, yes.
...
04/10/2017
- 03:18 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Task branch @1521c@ for review updated to revision @11149@.
This is the next step update. For @OO@ and @SQL@ group...
04/08/2017
- 11:56 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > We do not even have the WID_* keyword for control frame widget. Is it OK at this time for progress.g?
Yes, this ... - 11:46 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- You are mis-interpreting the parser.
This code:... - 11:28 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think you are mistaken. What makes you think they are transformed into other elements?
For ex... - 09:22 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > I declared all of them as having full support.
No, it is incorrect. All of these are NONE.
> Although I hav... - 08:33 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Task branch @1521c@ for review updated to revision @11148@.
This is not yet complete version. Items under investig...
04/06/2017
- 04:22 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The questions for the widgets:
>
> 1. Do we support the inclusion of... - 12:58 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Rebased task branch @1521c@ from P2J trunk revision @11146@. New revision is @11147@.
- 05:36 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Searched widget support level. And found all of them except @wid_sub_menu@ has partial supp... - 10:02 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Searched widget support level. And found all of them except @wid_sub_menu@ has partial support level. This means ther...
04/05/2017
- 06:32 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg,
Support level marking question:
Assume for the button widget all references are supported within expression...
04/01/2017
- 12:58 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > So the background to describe the support level is detailing investigation of the convert/expressions.rules, corre...
- 08:34 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Thinking about the way to find out the support status info for expression related keywords. Looks like the simple sea...
03/31/2017
- 03:21 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > These are known as "compiler constants" and having predefined values(0,1,2,...).
Yes.
> This means all of the...
03/30/2017
- 07:25 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Add to existed marking for literals?
>
> Yes, just add them to the map of literals. Why do ... - 03:52 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Ignore FILENAME, in expressions it needs no marking.
>
> @COLON@ needs to be handled. It shou... - 03:43 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Ignore FILENAME, in expressions it needs no marking.
@COLON@ needs to be handled. It should be handled on its own... - 03:23 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Updated and fixed keywords distribution into the groups:
@fields@
FIELD_BLOB
FIELD_CHAR
FIELD_CLASS
FIELD_CLOB... - 03:14 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- >> Add to existed marking fro literals?
>Yes, just add them to the map of literals. Why do anything else?
OK. - 03:12 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > Add to existed marking fro literals?
Yes, just add them to the map of literals. Why do anything else?
> It ... - 03:08 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > KW_FIND_CS
> > KW_FIND_GLO
> > KW_FIND_NO
> > KW_FIND_PO
> > KW_FIND_WA
> > KW_WIN_DMIN
>... - 01:21 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > KW_AVG
> KW_COUNT
> KW_MAX
> KW_MIN
> KW_SUM
These are already handled.
> MULTIPLY
This is handled tod... - 12:46 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- I have added @primary_expr@ with these sub-rules into general @expr@ schema. As to "unusual" built-in functions, almo...
- 08:21 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- >> I thought this was replaced with SYMBOL:
> ... - 07:40 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What about DB_REF_NON_STATIC?
I thought this was replaced with @SYMBOL@:... - 03:48 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- What about DB_REF_NON_STATIC?
- 03:47 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Did you check to see if we are marking all of the "unusual" built-in functions properly? Here is a list:
sql_aggr... - 03:47 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- I think that @primary_expr@ is missing from the @expr@ call tree in #1521-153. Have you handled all of these cases?
- 03:41 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > KW_BETWEEN
> KW_BY_PTR
> KW_BY_VAR_P
> KW_IS
These are not variables. All variables are VAR_ only. Please l... - 10:15 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Here is the expressions related keywords distributed to the respective groups. We can create either single file for a...
03/29/2017
- 03:51 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- The candidate list in note #149 has been updated based on recent research. Start separating the keywords for standalo...
- 02:51 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- This is the complete @expr@ rules tree:...
- 08:53 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- New keywords to process:...
03/28/2017
- 05:34 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > The question for UNKNOWN_TOKEN. This special artificial keyword means the detected keyword behind is not registered...
03/27/2017
- 05:04 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- I have checked once again all already marked categories in @gaps/gap_analysis_marking.xml@ and have not found somethi...
- 09:11 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- The candidate list for expression related keywords to add:...
03/24/2017
- 04:38 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > There are two more double items found for built-in functions:
>
> Fix those in 1521c.
Don... - 03:03 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Created task branch @1521c@ from trunk revision @11144@.
- 11:00 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > There are two more double items found for built-in functions:
Fix those in 1521c. - 11:00 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > The remaining FUNC_ that are not marked are:
> ...
> Correct?
No. We already mark any FUNC_ type that is mar... - 10:54 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> By the way, we already handle all the @FUNC_@ types that are marked as "builtin". The non-bu... - 08:24 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > General gap concept question. We need to enumerate all possible keywords and put them in a separate groups by some ...
- 12:25 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- New expression related(direct or indirect from @9th and highest precedence level of Progress 4GL expressions@) keywor...
03/23/2017
- 04:57 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- I checked in "Made 'all' build target depend on 'distribution' target." to 1521b revision 11149.
- 04:17 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Fixed.
- 04:05 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg,
Checking the keywords for already handled status I found small issue in @gaps/expression.rules@ file:... - 01:29 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- 1521b is frozen at this time. Eric is putting it through conversion regression testing. It has no runtime implicati...
- 07:38 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- > What about 9th and highest precendence level of Progress 4GL expressions? Do we need to consider the cases included...
03/22/2017
- 05:50 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Most of the token types in your list are already handled by the operators list in @gaps/expressio... - 09:02 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- Most of the token types in your list are already handled by the operators list in @gaps/expressions.rules@, right?
... - 10:01 PM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- The keywords extracted from different kind of expressions(in @progress.g@):...
03/21/2017
- 06:51 AM Feature #1521: implement gap analysis rules or backing database/marker approach
- I want you to focus on the @expr@ rule in @progress.g@. Do not worry about @convert/expression.rules@.
> I have a...
Also available in: Atom