Activity
From 07/03/2021 to 08/01/2021
07/26/2021
07/23/2021
- 05:12 PM Bug #5557 (Review): Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
- 02:20 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- This seems to work:...
- 02:09 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Do you mean the extra semicolon after the @while(..)@ ? I can only fix this manually in... - 02:00 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The question about if you can work around this still stands.
Do you mean the extra se... - 12:26 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Actually, the test above converts OK (I was missing the @<> ?@ right-side operand).
The question about if you can ... - 12:21 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Can you work around this issue? This block doesn't convert properly, either:...
- 10:47 AM Bug #5558 (WIP): Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- The fix in rev 12705 removes the extra semicolon after a label, but does not remove the extra semicolon after the @wh...
07/22/2021
- 03:06 PM Bug #5561 (Review): Direct Java interface: conversion crashes when an expression is passed as ar...
- Fixed in branch 3821c revision 12708. We must exclude Java method calls from built-in OO 4GL method processing.
C... - 11:55 AM Bug #5561: Direct Java interface: conversion crashes when an expression is passed as argument to...
- The following fragment conversion crashes:...
- 11:51 AM Bug #5561 (Review): Direct Java interface: conversion crashes when an expression is passed as ar...
- 01:15 PM Bug #5558 (Test): Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- 01:08 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Patch #5558-3
>
> I think it is correct. No objections.
Thanks, the patch is in ... - 12:55 PM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Code Review Patch #5558-3
I think it is correct. No objections. - 11:43 AM Bug #5558 (WIP): Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- Greg, please review this. I'm not sure how correct it is:...
- 09:55 AM Bug #5558: Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
- The following 4gl:...
- 09:51 AM Bug #5558 (WIP): Direct Java interface: extra semicolon in converted Java breaks program logic
07/21/2021
- 02:29 PM Bug #5557 (WIP): Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
- Fixed in 3821c rev 12697.
- 02:13 PM Bug #5557: Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please try this patch:
> [...]
It works, thank you! Will you commit the patch? - 02:07 PM Bug #5557: Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
- Please try this patch:...
- 01:48 PM Bug #5557: Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
- Example 4gl:...
- 01:36 PM Bug #5557 (Closed): Direct Java conversion: incorrect method call argument conversion
07/16/2021
- 10:43 AM Bug #5551: Case sensitivity of default buffer name
- At this moment, my isolated testcases passed. A problem was detected in a customer project with the dynamic temp-tabl...
- 10:11 AM Bug #5551: Case sensitivity of default buffer name
- After preliminary investigations, I traced that the legacy buffer name (@legacybufname@) is computed in @convert/buff...
- 10:03 AM Bug #5551: Case sensitivity of default buffer name
- A couple of weeks ago, while running some tests and I notice minor differences in the output between 4GL and FWD. The...
- 09:52 AM Bug #5551 (New): Case sensitivity of default buffer name
07/08/2021
- 11:54 AM Bug #5137: any text following a # character in the include or exclude file list is ignored
- The documentation has been updated.
- 11:53 AM Bug #5137 (Closed): any text following a # character in the include or exclude file list is ignored
- Fixed in 3821c revision 12645. We now only honor a @#@ character as a comment if it is the first character on the li...
Also available in: Atom