Activity
From 07/16/2015 to 08/14/2015
08/14/2015
- 04:41 PM Bug #2639 (Closed): Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- 04:40 PM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > make sure you explain to people that how they can pull down the latest harness code to their de... - 04:30 PM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- > make sure you explain to people that how they can pull down the latest harness code to their devsrv01 testing envir...
- 04:20 PM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- The task branch passed regression testing and was merged with the harness trunk and checked in as revision 8.
- 04:02 PM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- Yes, please do. As with #2603, when you send out the notification email, make sure you explain to people that how th...
- 03:54 PM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- It seems that the changed harness works fine. Can I merge my changes?
Thank you. - 09:14 AM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- Code Review Task Branch 2639a Revision 8
It looks good. Merge to trunk when it passes your testing. - 08:35 AM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- Fixed format literal.
Commited to branch 2639a, revno 8 - 08:27 AM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- created task branch 2639a
- 08:11 AM Bug #2639: Incorrect format specification in SendKey
- It seems that there is a misprint in the @com.goldencode.harness.test.SendKey@. The format specification @SPEC3@ is:
... - 08:11 AM Bug #2639 (Closed): Incorrect format specification in SendKey
Also available in: Atom