Activity
From 05/11/2021 to 06/09/2021
06/08/2021
- 05:44 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- * Added additional information to the log in the @unwrap()@ failure.
* Added optional use of the BouncyCastle JCE an... - 04:49 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- Constantin: Any objections?
- 04:05 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- We use a very old version of the BouncyCastle library which does not contain the JSSE provider required for TLS/SSL. ...
06/07/2021
- 07:12 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm not opposed to this, as long as it defaults to the JDK version. We already use BouncyCastle ... - 06:58 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- I'm not opposed to this, as long as it defaults to the JDK version. We already use BouncyCastle for certificate crea...
- 06:43 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can you put logging code in that will help you figure this out? Eugenie and others see this rout... - 06:35 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- Can you put logging code in that will help you figure this out? Eugenie and others see this routinely.
06/06/2021
- 03:27 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- I've tried to reproduce this issue both with @openjdk version "1.8.0_292"@ and Oracle @java version "1.8.0_201"@, but...
06/04/2021
- 10:02 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- I've found a similar issue in the internet- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53320551/javax-crypto-aeadbadtagexcep...
06/01/2021
- 02:16 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- This problem is also being seen in #5347.
05/26/2021
- 02:51 PM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- If we cannot recover the session, then we need to exit the web client. BUT if possible, we should try to reconnect t...
- 02:49 PM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- To clarify #5362-5 I added messages logs for the js web client...
- 02:48 PM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- I observed the case when the server threw...
- 12:18 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- > Sergey, could improper tuning of #5028-39 lead to this issue? Perhaps retry logic is trying to re-utilize a connect...
- 12:07 PM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- Sergey, could improper tuning of #5028-39 lead to this issue? Perhaps retry logic is trying to re-utilize a connectio...
- 11:46 AM Bug #5388: handshake failure while testing customer app
- I'm not sure this is actually a different root cause than #5362, but the stack trace is different.
While opening a... - 11:40 AM Bug #5388 (Closed): handshake failure while testing customer app
- 07:48 AM Feature #4405 (Closed): provide the capability to deliver static HTML and resources via the FWD s...
- 07:37 AM Feature #4405: provide the capability to deliver static HTML and resources via the FWD server's J...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Sergey: Please edit the "Web Server":/projects/p2j/wiki/Web_Server page to clarify these question...
05/25/2021
- 03:22 PM Feature #4405: provide the capability to deliver static HTML and resources via the FWD server's J...
- Sergey: Please edit the "Web Server":/projects/p2j/wiki/Web_Server page to clarify these questions:
* What is @web... - 08:58 AM Support #5221: Initialization failure during server runtime
- Deividas: Is everything working? I'd like to close this task if it is resolved.
05/19/2021
- 10:10 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Eric: Did you ever test the Enterprise version of GraalVM?
05/13/2021
- 07:26 AM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- If this is non-fatal, then perhaps we should reduce the logging level so that it is only seen when there is a more de...
- 07:25 AM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- From Igor:
> I've not seen this, but, as far as I remember, in such situation a new SSL handshake will be initiate... - 07:25 AM Bug #5362: Handshake failure while testing the simple web cllient
- From Sergey:
> Could you observe the same exceptions while working with the web client?
>
> ...
05/12/2021
05/11/2021
- 03:43 PM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- See attached.
- 02:59 PM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Constantin,
Do you use discrete GPU or integrated in CPU?
Can you please publish chrome://gpu content? Here or ... - 02:14 PM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The screen is opening in ~3.2 seconds on Chrome Version 90.0.4430.85 (Official Build) un... - 02:04 PM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- The screen is opening in ~3.2 seconds on Chrome Version 90.0.4430.85 (Official Build) unknown (64-bit).
I haven't ... - 11:18 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Constantin,
What timing do you have for sample screen opening with remote system?
I still think the result is s... - 10:27 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- > Greg: for the remote system, as this is accessed over the internet, I wonder how much impact the network transfer h...
- 10:12 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eugenie: in your 'bare metal system' case, do you run the web client there, too?
>
... - 10:08 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Eugenie: in your 'bare metal system' case, do you run the web client there, too?
Greg: for the remote system, as t... - 10:01 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The customer is probably testing based on the DOWN event since the user's perception is that at t... - 09:00 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- The customer is probably testing based on the DOWN event since the user's perception is that at that moment they have...
- 08:57 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > 2. The time started just after click mouse on screen initiation.
>
> Why "just after"? This... - 08:44 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- > 2. The time started just after click mouse on screen initiation.
Why "just after"? This will introduce a bias t... - 08:26 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Yes, please do.
>
> OK. I'm stopping the server for set it up.
... - 07:56 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please do.
OK. I'm stopping the server for set it up. - 07:38 AM Support #5354: usage of GraalVM for better performance
- Yes, please do.
Also available in: Atom