Activity
From 06/10/2022 to 07/09/2022
07/06/2022
- 05:45 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Not yet. 5567a has not been merged to 3821c.
- 05:35 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- What is the status of this task? Am I able to do devops image building like Ansible and Docker _without_ including Ja...
06/27/2022
- 03:10 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:
> [... - 02:34 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:...
06/26/2022
- 02:05 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Re-worked Conscrypt support based on the code review. Added JMC counters for @send@, @wrap@, and @unwrap@ operations ...
06/24/2022
- 02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SS... - 02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
>
> 1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be... - 02:34 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SSL processing.
- 02:33 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be referenced in @Security... - 12:19 PM Bug #6084 (Test): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good.
Thank you.
Committed to 3821c/14001. - 12:11 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good.
- 11:09 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> If you remove the empty branch and add @provider != null@ to the last branch, then @null@ will... - 11:04 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds nois... - 10:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds noise to the code and do @else i... - 10:52 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. ... - 09:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. So that the condition is not... - 09:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code review @6084.diff@.
> >
> > In @ServerDriver.java@:
> >
... - 09:30 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review @6084.diff@.
>
> In @ServerDriver.java@:
>
> [...]
>
> @null@ should be h... - 08:40 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code review @6084.diff@.
In @ServerDriver.java@:... - 07:05 AM Bug #6084 (Review): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Added support for the @Conscrypt@ SSL provider.
I've also changed the way for configuring non-default SSL providers....
06/23/2022
- 10:27 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > Greg, there are 2 clamscan processes still running on devsrv01... this usually affects ChUI regression testing.
... - 10:23 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg, there are 2 clamscan processes still running on devsrv01... this usually affects ChUI regression testing.
- 10:11 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- The main regression testing should complete in less than 4 hours. Anything more than that suggests many unexpected f...
- 04:58 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- For now I have baseline for ctrl-c tests.
I started main regression tests yesterday but they are still running after...
06/17/2022
- 10:35 AM Bug #6529: Incompatible uppercasing.
- I've noticed the following incompatibility.
Consider the following code:... - 10:33 AM Bug #6529 (New): Incompatible uppercasing.
06/14/2022
- 05:26 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Feel free to fix the issue in the harness as well.
- 04:52 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You mean this?
>
> [...]
>
> Go ahead and add it everywhere.
>
> > or maybe it's an easy... - 04:27 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- You mean this?...
- 03:32 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I will try to check what is going on by shortening ctrlc0 and all1 scenarios, as there are no ... - 11:39 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> As I've changed linked @run@ directory to @deploy@ directory I have to manualy update @client.... - 07:06 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- The old @run/@ directory is gone and will not come back. Any remaining references should be found and fixed. It is ...
- 06:16 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- As I've changed linked @run@ directory to @deploy@ directory I have to manualy update @client.sh@ script:
Note that ... - 06:07 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- It seems I found an issue in regression tests - runDir is not properly set in tests despite its correctly set in harn...
- 03:38 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Main Regression tests were running all night and they are still running, so something is wrong there.
I need to rest... - 09:13 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I appreciate the concern. Thank you for noting this, it is important.
>
> On the other hand, ... - 08:25 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- I appreciate the concern. Thank you for noting this, it is important.
On the other hand, I want us to have a choi... - 03:08 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- I've an impression that @Conscrypt@ is mostly used on the Android platform.
Moreover, it is based on @BoringSSL@. He...
06/13/2022
- 03:47 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Due to issues with regression testing on latest trunk I still need to hold, reported issue in #5034#note-2358
- 12:04 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Yes, it is OK.
- 12:00 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- As far as I understand @Conscrypt@ code is not pure Java - it contains native parts. Is it acceptable?
Thank you. - 11:32 AM Bug #6084 (WIP): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
06/10/2022
- 10:28 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- I fired two curls (interval of some seconds) in my terminal and I got:...
- 09:56 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am running the same version of Gradle. It is odd the fact that when I access https://repo... - 09:51 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- I am running the same version of Gradle. It is odd the fact that when I access https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/con...
- 08:31 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I have an issue when using @./gradlew all@ to build FWD:
>
> [...]
>
> Th... - 08:11 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- I have an issue when using @./gradlew all@ to build FWD:...
Also available in: Atom