Activity
From 06/18/2022 to 07/17/2022
07/17/2022
- 11:03 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- If I understand correctly, we are good to go with the proposed change. Is there any reason to *not* commit this?
07/14/2022
- 11:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Added total time in ns to the @NanoCounter.toStrng@.
Committed to 3821c/ 14067.
07/12/2022
- 06:42 AM Support #5221 (Closed): Initialization failure during server runtime
- As far as I know, this is complete. We can reopen it if needed in the future.
07/11/2022
- 12:02 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- A customer did some testing on Java 11. They ran branch 6129a which is a modified version of an older 3821c. This 6...
- 11:50 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> There is issue in @sheet:war@ target with @keikai@ jars and latest JDK 11 - latest @javac@ due... - 11:46 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- There is issue in @sheet:war@ target with @keikai@ jars and latest JDK 11 - latest @javac@ due to changes in jar/zip ...
- 06:24 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Rebased to 3821c/14055, patched local version with fixes to #5739, #5737, #6523 and restarted ctrl-c tests with Java ...
07/06/2022
- 05:45 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Not yet. 5567a has not been merged to 3821c.
- 05:35 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- What is the status of this task? Am I able to do devops image building like Ansible and Docker _without_ including Ja...
06/27/2022
- 03:10 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:
> [... - 02:34 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:...
06/26/2022
- 02:05 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Re-worked Conscrypt support based on the code review. Added JMC counters for @send@, @wrap@, and @unwrap@ operations ...
06/24/2022
- 02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SS... - 02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
>
> 1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be... - 02:34 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SSL processing.
- 02:33 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be referenced in @Security... - 12:19 PM Bug #6084 (Test): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good.
Thank you.
Committed to 3821c/14001. - 12:11 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good.
- 11:09 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> If you remove the empty branch and add @provider != null@ to the last branch, then @null@ will... - 11:04 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds nois... - 10:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds noise to the code and do @else i... - 10:52 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. ... - 09:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. So that the condition is not... - 09:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code review @6084.diff@.
> >
> > In @ServerDriver.java@:
> >
... - 09:30 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review @6084.diff@.
>
> In @ServerDriver.java@:
>
> [...]
>
> @null@ should be h... - 08:40 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Code review @6084.diff@.
In @ServerDriver.java@:... - 07:05 AM Bug #6084 (Review): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Added support for the @Conscrypt@ SSL provider.
I've also changed the way for configuring non-default SSL providers....
06/23/2022
- 10:27 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > Greg, there are 2 clamscan processes still running on devsrv01... this usually affects ChUI regression testing.
... - 10:23 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg, there are 2 clamscan processes still running on devsrv01... this usually affects ChUI regression testing.
- 10:11 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- The main regression testing should complete in less than 4 hours. Anything more than that suggests many unexpected f...
- 04:58 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- For now I have baseline for ctrl-c tests.
I started main regression tests yesterday but they are still running after...
Also available in: Atom