FWD » Core Development » Runtime Infrastructure

07/22/2022

11:53 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

I did a whole lot of smoke testing on <app_c>. Most of the issue were pilot error where I forgot to change from Java ... Roger Borrello

07/21/2022

07:59 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz: It would be great if you post a list of the items to handle/consider when shifting a FWD ... Tomasz Domin

07:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

CTRL-C tests for 5567a + @5739-4.diff@ + @5737a.diff@ completed successfully on my local workstation, I've uploaded... Tomasz Domin

07:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. Let me @10-15@... Tomasz Domin

06:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Questions for Tomasz:
>
> # Is this branch ready for wider testing? If so, I'd like to make a... Tomasz Domin

06:33 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> > I'd like to code up a check on the Java version, and make the decision in the server.sh script... Roger Borrello

05:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz: It would be great if you post a list of the items to handle/consider when shifting a FWD installation from Ja... Greg Shah

05:53 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

I think so. Tomasz never mentioned this, but it wouldn't have been possible for any of our teammates to do testing o... Greg Shah

05:49 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger: After Tomasz has the latest changes checked in, please do a quick check of @<app_c>@.
T... Roger Borrello

05:16 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Roger: After Tomasz has the latest changes checked in, please do a quick check of @<app_c>@.
Tomasz: What is the s... Greg Shah

04:57 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Tomasz,
> >
> > Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TL... Tomasz Domin

03:41 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. ... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:31 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

My tests for @<app_s>@ were done with this; I did not apply any other TLS patch, was done with 5567a as in rev 14102
... Constantin Asofiei

03:28 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz,
Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. Let me @10-15@ min to test. Eugenie Lyzenko

03:22 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > No difference, same errors. I will t... Eugenie Lyzenko

03:21 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > and syslog will show this:
> > [...]
>
> Check @ldd /opt/sp... Constantin Asofiei

03:10 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> and syslog will show this:
> [...]
Check @ldd /opt/spawner/spawn@
It should be:
<p... Tomasz Domin

03:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, us... Constantin Asofiei

02:57 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > No difference, same errors. I will try previous release of the @JD... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:51 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> No difference, same errors. I will try previous release of the @JDK11@.
My Java version
<... Tomasz Domin

02:36 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Testing update:
> > >
> > > So I ... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:24 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Testing update:
> >
> > So I think only @NIO@ issue left here.
... Eugenie Lyzenko

02:24 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11?
... Tomasz Domin

02:16 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11?
... Tomasz Domin

02:11 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11? Constantin Asofiei

02:07 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Testing update:
>
> So I think only @NIO@ issue left here.
Please Try @5567-1.diff@
Tomasz Domin

01:54 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Testing update:
1. Compilation is OK.
2. The @Swing@ client works. I did some smoke tests with @app_m@ and found ... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:11 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, we are testing 5567a which is rebased from 3821c rev 14087.
I'll update the environment a... Eugenie Lyzenko

01:02 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Yes, we are testing 5567a which is rebased from 3821c rev 14087. Greg Shah

01:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

> I had to switch TLS Context from TLS to TLSv3, Greg - was I allowed to do this ?
I don't have an objection, as l... Greg Shah

01:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
> >
> Than... Eugenie Lyzenko

12:50 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
>
Thank you Eugenie.
> 1. The @F... Tomasz Domin

10:12 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
1. The @FWD@ can not be compiled with @Java 11@ (to be fixed)... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:06 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Code review 5567a revisions 14099..14102. The changes look good. Hynek Cihlar

09:05 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

> I'd like to code up a check on the Java version, and make the decision in the server.sh script.
This is a good ... Greg Shah

09:04 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

If I understand correctly, the old way only works for Java 8 and the new way works for Java 9 and above. Greg Shah

09:03 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in ... Roger Borrello

08:13 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Spawner fails:... Constantin Asofiei

08:00 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in Java 11? I get this error... Tomasz Domin

07:54 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in Java 11? I get this error when starting @<app_s>@:
<p... Constantin Asofiei

06:54 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Questions for Tomasz:
# Is this branch ready for wider testing? If so, I'd like to make a push on testing for thi... Greg Shah

05:44 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

This is great! When you have equivalent results, please report on the performance between Java 8 and 11. Greg Shah

07/20/2022

06:06 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Found working regression test and p2j combination (rev *14087*).
Rebased to *14087* and pushed to *5567a*/*14102*
... Tomasz Domin

07/17/2022

11:03 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client

If I understand correctly, we are good to go with the proposed change. Is there any reason to *not* commit this? Greg Shah

07/14/2022

11:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Added total time in ns to the @NanoCounter.toStrng@.
Committed to 3821c/ 14067. Igor Skornyakov

07/12/2022

06:42 AM Support #5221 (Closed): Initialization failure during server runtime

As far as I know, this is complete. We can reopen it if needed in the future. Greg Shah

07/11/2022

12:02 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

A customer did some testing on Java 11. They ran branch 6129a which is a modified version of an older 3821c. This 6... Greg Shah

11:50 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> There is issue in @sheet:war@ target with @keikai@ jars and latest JDK 11 - latest @javac@ due... Hynek Cihlar

11:46 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

There is issue in @sheet:war@ target with @keikai@ jars and latest JDK 11 - latest @javac@ due to changes in jar/zip ... Tomasz Domin

06:24 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Rebased to 3821c/14055, patched local version with fixes to #5739, #5737, #6523 and restarted ctrl-c tests with Java ... Tomasz Domin

07/06/2022

05:45 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

Not yet. 5567a has not been merged to 3821c. Greg Shah

05:35 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11

What is the status of this task? Am I able to do devops image building like Ansible and Docker _without_ including Ja... Roger Borrello

06/27/2022

03:10 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:
> [... Igor Skornyakov

02:34 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Igor, in Eclipse I get a 'package not found' for this, in @SecureSocketsRegistrar@:... Constantin Asofiei

06/26/2022

02:05 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Re-worked Conscrypt support based on the code review. Added JMC counters for @send@, @wrap@, and @unwrap@ operations ... Igor Skornyakov

06/24/2022

02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SS... Igor Skornyakov

02:37 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
>
> 1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be... Igor Skornyakov

02:34 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Please also implement any JMX instrumentation needed to help us measure the performance of the SSL processing. Greg Shah

02:33 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14001
1. @BCProbe@ and @BouncyCastle@ should not be referenced in @Security... Greg Shah

12:19 PM Bug #6084 (Test): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good.
Thank you.
Committed to 3821c/14001. Igor Skornyakov

12:11 PM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Code review 6084-1.diff. The changes are good. Hynek Cihlar

11:09 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> If you remove the empty branch and add @provider != null@ to the last branch, then @null@ will... Igor Skornyakov

11:04 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds nois... Hynek Cihlar

10:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I see. In that case please remove the empty branch as it adds noise to the code and do @else i... Igor Skornyakov

10:52 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. ... Hynek Cihlar

09:58 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > @null@ should be handled similarly as the invalid value case. So that the condition is not... Igor Skornyakov

09:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code review @6084.diff@.
> >
> > In @ServerDriver.java@:
> >
... Hynek Cihlar

09:30 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review @6084.diff@.
>
> In @ServerDriver.java@:
>
> [...]
>
> @null@ should be h... Igor Skornyakov

08:40 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Code review @6084.diff@.
In @ServerDriver.java@:... Hynek Cihlar

07:05 AM Bug #6084 (Review): NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL

Added support for the @Conscrypt@ SSL provider.
I've also changed the way for configuring non-default SSL providers.... Igor Skornyakov