Activity
From 07/14/2022 to 08/12/2022
08/12/2022
- 04:47 PM Bug #6671: Build configurations need "fine tuning"
- The @3821c_14154@ revision allows the Hotel ChUI server to start using the @fwdServer@ deployment, and the client to ...
- 10:50 AM Bug #6671 (New): Build configurations need "fine tuning"
- 03:11 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz: Do you have comparable ChUI regression test results between 3821c and 5567a?
08/10/2022
- 09:09 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- If 5567a has the same ChUI regression testing results as 3821c, then the only thing holding us back from merging 5567...
- 04:10 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Tomasz, I just checked @build.gradle@ into @3821c_14140@ with the update mentioned above. Is...
08/09/2022
- 02:02 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz, I just checked @build.gradle@ into @3821c_14140@ with the update mentioned above. Is there any way both 3821c...
08/08/2022
- 01:23 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > It took some time as each run takes about 6-7 hours (build + database import + tests).
From my memory about expe... - 07:43 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- weekly rebase to 3821c/14131, committed 5821c/14149
- 04:05 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> This results in the usage of @xml-apis-1.4.01.jar@, which seems to alleviate a conversion er... - 02:28 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- I've made it to run main_regression tests on my local workstation. It took some time as each run takes about 6-7 hour...
08/05/2022
- 03:47 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've made changes to build scripts to make this branch compatible with Java 8 again
> So now ... - 07:12 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- I've made changes to build scripts to make this branch compatible with Java 8 again
So now JVM used during compiling... - 06:47 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > The performance decrease from shifting to Java 11 is an expected feature. This is not a bug but cost for using more...
08/04/2022
- 10:41 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Two notes here:
1. The patch in @5567-2.diff@ is need to be applied even for further versions of the @Java 8@, not... - 05:47 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- We have indeed done a large amount of testing of the persistence layer/database performance in FWD. There are many a...
08/03/2022
- 02:03 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> A customer did some testing on Java 11. They ran branch 6129a which is a modified version of an ...
08/02/2022
- 03:56 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I'll do the same for other applications instead of making java version related branches.
We... - 03:35 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Rebased to 3821c/14122, pushed 5567a/14138
Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I'd like to code up a...
08/01/2022
- 08:04 AM Feature #6646: short circuit legacy REST program invocation
- > When registering the REST/SOAP services, FWD knows exactly what Java method should be invoked - this should allow t...
- 08:03 AM Feature #6646 (New): short circuit legacy REST program invocation
07/22/2022
- 11:53 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- I did a whole lot of smoke testing on <app_c>. Most of the issue were pilot error where I forgot to change from Java ...
07/21/2022
- 07:59 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz: It would be great if you post a list of the items to handle/consider when shifting a FWD ... - 07:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
CTRL-C tests for 5567a + @5739-4.diff@ + @5737a.diff@ completed successfully on my local workstation, I've uploaded...- 07:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. Let me @10-15@... - 06:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Questions for Tomasz:
>
> # Is this branch ready for wider testing? If so, I'd like to make a... - 06:33 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I'd like to code up a check on the Java version, and make the decision in the server.sh script... - 05:55 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz: It would be great if you post a list of the items to handle/consider when shifting a FWD installation from Ja...
- 05:53 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- I think so. Tomasz never mentioned this, but it wouldn't have been possible for any of our teammates to do testing o...
- 05:49 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger: After Tomasz has the latest changes checked in, please do a quick check of @<app_c>@.
T... - 05:16 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Roger: After Tomasz has the latest changes checked in, please do a quick check of @<app_c>@.
Tomasz: What is the s... - 04:57 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Tomasz,
> >
> > Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TL... - 03:41 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. ... - 03:31 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- My tests for @<app_s>@ were done with this; I did not apply any other TLS patch, was done with 5567a as in rev 14102
... - 03:28 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz,
Seems like @ctx = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2",...@ resolves the issue. Let me @10-15@ min to test. - 03:22 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > No difference, same errors. I will t... - 03:21 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > and syslog will show this:
> > [...]
>
> Check @ldd /opt/sp... - 03:10 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> and syslog will show this:
> [...]
Check @ldd /opt/spawner/spawn@
It should be:
<p... - 03:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, us... - 02:57 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > No difference, same errors. I will try previous release of the @JD... - 02:51 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> No difference, same errors. I will try previous release of the @JDK11@.
My Java version
<... - 02:36 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Testing update:
> > >
> > > So I ... - 02:24 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Testing update:
> >
> > So I think only @NIO@ issue left here.
... - 02:24 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11?
... - 02:16 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11?
... - 02:11 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz, are you able to run the FWD web client in Hotel GUI, using 5567a and Java 11?
- 02:07 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Testing update:
>
> So I think only @NIO@ issue left here.
Please Try @5567-1.diff@
- 01:54 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Testing update:
1. Compilation is OK.
2. The @Swing@ client works. I did some smoke tests with @app_m@ and found ... - 01:11 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, we are testing 5567a which is rebased from 3821c rev 14087.
I'll update the environment a... - 01:02 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Yes, we are testing 5567a which is rebased from 3821c rev 14087.
- 01:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > I had to switch TLS Context from TLS to TLSv3, Greg - was I allowed to do this ?
I don't have an objection, as l... - 01:01 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
> >
> Than... - 12:50 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
>
Thank you Eugenie.
> 1. The @F... - 10:12 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- The problems found in starting @app_m@ with @JDK11@:
1. The @FWD@ can not be compiled with @Java 11@ (to be fixed)... - 09:06 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Code review 5567a revisions 14099..14102. The changes look good.
- 09:05 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- > I'd like to code up a check on the Java version, and make the decision in the server.sh script.
This is a good ... - 09:04 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- If I understand correctly, the old way only works for Java 8 and the new way works for Java 9 and above.
- 09:03 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in ... - 08:13 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Spawner fails:...
- 08:00 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in Java 11? I get this error... - 07:54 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- What's the equivalent for @-Djava.ext.dirs=null:../lib/spi@ in Java 11? I get this error when starting @<app_s>@:
<p... - 06:54 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Questions for Tomasz:
# Is this branch ready for wider testing? If so, I'd like to make a push on testing for thi... - 05:44 AM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- This is great! When you have equivalent results, please report on the performance between Java 8 and 11.
07/20/2022
- 06:06 PM Support #5567: move FWD to Java 11
- Found working regression test and p2j combination (rev *14087*).
Rebased to *14087* and pushed to *5567a*/*14102*
...
07/17/2022
- 11:03 AM Feature #5776: reduce memory requirements for the FWD client
- If I understand correctly, we are good to go with the proposed change. Is there any reason to *not* commit this?
07/14/2022
- 11:44 AM Bug #6084: NIO SSL performance is slower than standard Java SSL
- Added total time in ns to the @NanoCounter.toStrng@.
Committed to 3821c/ 14067.
Also available in: Atom