Activity
From 03/04/2024 to 04/02/2024
04/01/2024
- 08:02 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * in OE, SysError is used for internal errors (via ErrorManager for FWD). But, there is... - 05:21 AM Bug #8383 (WIP): Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * in OE, SysError is used for internal errors (via ErrorManager for FWD). But, there is... - 05:09 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Galya, some notes:
* we need to be careful with naming FWD internal methods added to skeleton classes/interfaces (in...
03/29/2024
- 07:42 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Did you test both embedded mode and virtual desktop in Hotel GUI?
>
Yes, I did
> Did you test... - 04:44 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- It would be interesting to profile a test case with both Java 8 and Java 17 and see where the times differ. Having mo...
- 03:16 AM Feature #8544: Move spawner code to JNI
- The spawner executable exists as a separate deployment with the sole purpose of providing admin rights only to a stri...
- 02:51 AM Feature #8544 (New): Move spawner code to JNI
03/28/2024
- 05:13 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Yes, this can be found in #8208-18. A summary for those that can't access that task:
> * Java 8 is faster than Ja... - 04:05 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Guys,
Regarding possible migration I have a question. Will we have performance degradation with @Java 8 -> Java 17... - 03:46 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Did you test both embedded mode and virtual desktop in Hotel GUI?
Did you test call graph in Hotel GUI?
We need... - 02:43 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I know you've been doing some amount of testing on this. As far as I know, we only have testing ... - 02:07 PM Feature #6692 (Internal Test): move FWD to Java 17
- I know you've been doing some amount of testing on this. As far as I know, we only have testing and any fixes that a...
03/15/2024
- 08:05 AM Bug #8383 (Review): Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- 8383a based on trunk r15055.
8383a r15058 ready for review.
I've decided on an imperfect solution that will hop... - 07:18 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- To run tests:
* @oo/progress/lang/test_apperror.p@
* @oo/json/object/get_json_object.p@
03/14/2024
- 06:52 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- There is another issue: The error is logged twice (no matter if silent or not). That is because @BlockManager.process...
- 05:29 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- I'll have to try and find examples of code to test the different branches of @processLegacyError@ to be able to 100% ...
- 05:28 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- @TransactionManager@ does a trick that is not taken into consideration in @BlockManager.processLegacyError@, when log...
- 04:49 AM Bug #8383 (WIP): Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
03/04/2024
- 07:36 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- @com.goldencode.p2j.oo.json.objectmodel.JsonObject@ throws errors using @undoThrow@, that is explicit @LegacyErrorExc...
- 07:32 AM Bug #8383 (Review): Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
Also available in: Atom